OF THE
TIMES
131. Mr. Biden admits that the October 19, 2020 Politico article referenced a Mac shop owner in Delaware.Yep.
132. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 132.
133. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 133.
134. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 134.
135. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 135.
136. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 136.
137. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 137.
138. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 138.
139. Mr. Biden is without knowledge sufficient to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 139
Why the polemic of personal property & a sense of moral duty to report reasonable suspicion of crime(s) once a tech discovers the information ? Are personal rights trumped by a suspicion of crime ?
What if the Laptop‘s SSD/HD also had Child porn or Bestiality ? What constitutes disturbing behavior ? Define it. Disturbing to whom ? Does a LBGT-GF person constitute disturbing behavior ?
Does a celibate Monk‘s consciousness experience & define disturbing behavior ?
Is there a standardized metric for evaluating what disturbing behavior is ? Is morality transitive ? Who decides moral relativism ? What metrics of Hu man behavior define it ?
You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.