OF THE
TIMES
Via RTDespite violating airspace, the US will continue to do whatever it wants:
Russia's ambassador to the US has accused Senator Lindsey Graham of trying to provoke a "dangerous escalation" between the two countries, after the senior lawmaker urged the Pentagon to fire on Russian fighter jets.
Asked about Graham's comments on Wednesday, Ambassador Anatoly Antonov said the senator's call to shoot down Russian aircraft went "far beyond common sense" and risked all-out war between the world's largest nuclear powers.
[...]
Graham appeared on Fox News earlier on Wednesday to discuss a recent close encounter between Russian fighter jets and a US MQ-9 Reaper drone near Crimea, calling for a tough response from President Joe Biden after the UAV was sent plunging into the Black Sea.
"What would Ronald Reagan do right now? He would start shooting Russian planes down, if they were threatening our assets," Graham told the outlet, referring to the US leader who served at the height of Cold War brinkmanship with the Soviet Union.
[...]
Washington has flown drones and surveillance craft near the Russian border on a near-constant basis over the last year, providing intelligence - along with weapons, ammunition and money - to the Ukrainian government even as it insists it is not a party to the conflict. The exact location of this week's drone encounter was not confirmed by either government, though Russian news outlets have reported that the Reaper's last location was about 60 kilometers (37 miles) southwest of the Crimean port of Sevastopol.
Via RT... and wherever international law does not allow.
US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin reached out to his Russian counterpart, Sergey Shoigu, on Wednesday, for the first time in months, to discuss the incident in which an American spy drone went down in the Black Sea waters off Crimea.
According to the Russian Defense Ministry, Shoigu told Austin that the incident was caused by the Americans violating the airspace restriction declared by Russia, with all the proper international notifications in place. Shoigu called US drone flights off the Russian coast "provocative in nature" and risked an escalation of tensions in the Black Sea.
While Russia does not desire such a development, it will "continue to respond proportionately to all provocations," Shoigu said. He added that the two nuclear powers "must act as responsibly as possible," which includes keeping a military channel open to discuss any crisis.
Speaking at a Pentagon press briefing, Austin confirmed that he made the call, and said it was "important that great powers be models of transparency and communication." However, he insisted the US would "continue to fly and to operate wherever international law allows."
I assume that the use of an EMP would have been noticed, as it close to impossible to create an EMP with a single targeted direction so that it is not noticeable from e.g. satellites.I would disagree. High frequency pulses are very easy to direct, and second, the jet came very close to the target. As EM field intensity drops in a cubical manner (?) with distance, this distance matters.
"What would the last president that had dementia in office have done? He would have escalated, of course!"
I heard 3 different theories in the last days. Either a fuel dump onto the drone, a aerodynamical destabilisation via tapping it's wings (a method that crashed the German V1 doodlebugs), or an EM weapon.
While I would initially have suspected the third (EMP), footage I saw seems to support the fuel dump method.