Society's Child
The calls follow the admission by the environment secretary that the government had set weaker air pollution targets than it would like. The admission came as she announced a new environmental plan for England that held back from banning wood-burning stoves and settled instead for "educating" people on their use.
The Times subsequently reported that the government would encourage councils to use their powers to issue householders £300 on-the-spot fines for flouting air pollution rules by burning logs at home.
But the Green party co-leader Carla Denyer said the government should go further and potentially end the sale of log burners.
She said: "Local authorities have powers to create smoke control areas in cities under the Environment Act 2021. This goes some way to preventing homeowners and businesses releasing smoke from a chimney. However, there are exemptions for particular stoves and fuels which still mean dangerous particulates can be released into the atmosphere.
"We need an urgent review into the impacts of smoke from chimneys on public health in high-density housing areas, with a view to putting an end to future sales of log burners and fuels if they are shown to have an unacceptable detrimental impact."
The environment charity ClientEarth, which has won pollution cases against the government, has said the burners need to be phased out. Andrea Lee, from the charity, said: "Pollution from wood-burning is a growing source of fine particulate matter pollution in some areas, which is a serious threat to people's health."
The Liberal Democrats have called for more powers for local councils to stop the use of polluting burners. A spokesperson said they were disappointed that it had taken so long for the ban on house coal and wet wood to come through.
"The new eco-design has reduced air pollution from wood burners but more needs to be done including encouraging households to replace older wood burners with the new design. We believe local authorities should have more powers to tackle air pollution in their areas," the spokesperson said.
Under the 2021 Environment Act, councils have powers to issue on-the-spot civil penalties of up to £300. The government's plans to encourage councils to take action mean that criminal prosecutions could be pursued for the most persistent offenders, resulting in a fine of up to £5,000 plus a further £2,500 for each day a breach continues afterwards.
However, English councils have issued only 17 fines over six years, despite more than 18,000 complaints, as it is difficult and expensive to prove guilt and then take people to court. Few councils have the resources to vigorously pursue this specific issue.
There will also be tighter regulation of new wood burners, which in designated "smoke control areas" will be allowed to produce no more than 3g of smoke per hour, instead of 5g at present.
Sarah MacFadyen, the head of Policy at Asthma UK and the British Lung Foundation, said: "We know that burning wood and coal releases fine particulate matter - the most worrying form of air pollution for human health - which can cause people with a lung condition such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to have a potentially life-threatening attack or flare-up.
"It's therefore important to consider less polluting fuel options to heat your home or cook with, especially if coal or wood is not your primary fuel source."
Reader Comments
Our respective Western govs, no matter the political party, are only for show, for the small things, anything big, life altering comes from ''their'' handlers, really big money.
I've a problem with the french since 1066Since 1066?! That would make you nearly 1000 years old!
Maybe some people need a grudge in order to stay alive.
Technically, those invaders of 1066 were not fully French, but Nor-men (men from the North... as in, Vikings)... according to official history... After centuries of not being able to get a firm hold on the island, they decided to settle on the northern French coast, build up their forces, and then come a-plundering and a-pillaging disguised as European royalty... Considering that such invaders were the masters of disguise, one has to wonder whether they were really Scandinavian Vikings, or perhaps wandering Khazars - their behaviour of infiltration and ransacking seems to be more in tune with the latter. A hidden history perhaps.
It was like Oliver Cromwell. The Jews were expelled from Britain in 1290, and they wanted back in - it was actually a very prosperous country. English wool, due to the climate, was softer and warmer than any other, the fibers were longer, and it was prized all over Europe. There is correspondence between Cromwell and the Jews of Amsterdam, (where many Spanish Jews, such as the Roosevelt and Delano families, settled after they were expelled from Spain in 1492. That's how they ended up in New Amsterdam, later New York.) The Jews financed Cromwell in the English Civil War, but one of their conditions in their letters was that Cromwell should kill the King (Charles I) and abolish the monarchy, which had expelled them 350 years before. One of Cromwell's first actions was to allow the Jews back in, and when Charles II was put back on the throne in 1660, he discreetly did not punish the Jews for their instigation of his father's execution. They were too powerful, too good at instigating wars among the Christians, as they had already demonstrated. They are doing it again today in the Ukraine, where hundreds of thousands of Christian boys are killing each other, while Zelensky, Kholomoisky, Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, and the other Jews running the country egg them on and become billionaires. It has been going on for millennia.
We should never forget how much effort is actually required to be lazy: People work overtime and intensively in order to afford a dish-washer; the piece of garbage that was thrown and missed the bin will now require the thrower to get up, walk, bend over, pick up the trash, and then haphazardly aim at the bin again, only to miss the target once more. The fact that modern Khazars are lazy should never take away from the fact that they have invested enormous amounts of energy to arrive at that position.
I can't remember his full name off the top of my head (I could find out on the internet, but I'm being lazy right now, so I'm writing a hundred words as a substitute!) but Freedman in New York back in the 20th century exposed the Khazars as being “a war-like people”: At that time, other kingdoms would hire mercenary Khazars to fill in the gaps in their army. In the past, the Khazars were active and energetic... but, we could say, perhaps some of additional curse has befallen them, making them lazy and hypnotised by their opulence... Nevertheless, on another level, they certainly are much more active than the majority of human beings.
Who knows how much history has been twisted and turned upside down! For instance, the clearing of the island was initiated by the supposed “King John the Bad”... apart from running the Jews out of the island, he wasn't really that bad, and if anything records show he was a much more conscious ruler than his gay brother Richard the Lionheart, who spent most of his reign out of Britain kissing the backside of King Phillip of France - Richard the queer who pratically abandoned the island is now called “the Lionheart” whilst his brother who actually DID things to try and help the British people is now called “the Bad”!
There is also the layer of lies called Puritanism (very close to the Jewish word Purim) - a supposed “Christian” sect which only studied the Old Testament, and whose members dressed exactly like modern jews (long black clothes with wide-rimmed hats), whose beliefs seemed to be more focused on revenge rather than forgiving one's neighbour. It is said that Cromwell was a Puritan. The whole Puritanical governments did everything they could to divide and conquer the British people: if one was not a royalist, one was then a parliamentarian, or if one was not a catholic then one was protestant: pure jewish tactics to divide the people.
Thanks for writing... I can't write more, gotta go!...
The Freedman you mention is Benjamin H. Freedman, a Jew who had rejected Judaism and converted to Christianity. Here is the text of his famous 1961 speech in New York: [Link]
There is a difference between being lazy and not wanting to get one's hands dirty with manual labor. The Khazars are far from lazy. Perhaps they were mercenaries in the past - they are certainly a very aggressive and brutal tribe. But today, one never finds a Jew in the trenches of any war getting shot at. (At least, since the conscription of WWII.) Instead, they work diligently, even assiduously, to deprive other people of their money and goods through manipulation of financial instruments, contracts, legal stratagems, and outright theft. I won't post a link to illustrate their dishonesty, as I have about 100 links and would not know where to start. But if you have the stomach for it, let me know and I'll send you some.
The Puritans were very much like modern Orthodox Jews - black clothes, strict codes of behavior, shunning or murder of dissidents, etc - but I don't think there's any connection. The same is true of modern Islamic fundamentalism - black robes, strict dogma, and so on. All religious fundamentalists seem to gravitate towards the same types of dress and behavior. Look at the Amish - very similar.
2nd, joking and an englishman joke at that
3rd Vikings
Lemuel Gulliver They don't want to get their hands dirty, but they happily stick their dicks into any shit hole or carcass. It almost supersedes the phrase “squint at a gnat but swallow a camel”... It's shameful to even mention it, but such is the level of hypocrisy and degeneration these days. “what would they do when the wood is dry?”
PS: Here are a pair of articles on that site illustrating the corrupt Jewish takeover of Britain and the rest of the world, remembering that Britain was the world's leading Empire at that time, as the USA is today. In fact the Jews played a large part in the collapse of one and the rise of the other, as they are now playing a large part in the collapse of the USA: [Link] and [Link]
The North men to my mind are the 'neo' vikings or Scandinavians that populated the Frieslands and down to france.
Comment: First they came for the gas stoves... and now the wood stoves...