© BrewminatePuritan Justice
The world turns and things change. Everybody knows that. But the turnings and changings throw off sparks, which light fires. The intellectual turnings of the European Renaissance lit fires in the lumbering bureaucracy of Roman Catholicism, burdened as it was with abstruse theology larded with lingering, age-old superstition. Witch hunts, inquisitions, and persecutions ensued, even as the authority of the old order wobbled and frayed. The gross cruelties of the people in charge didn't bolster their prestige, and a few centuries later you see the result: belief is dead.
Likewise in Western Civ today. Our authorities have disgraced themselves behind a new theology of degenerate "science" that veers back into superstition and necromancy. Proof that they don't believe their own story shows in their desperate efforts to hide the data, confabulate numbers, ignore true facts, and lash out viciously at anyone who discloses their zealous deceits.
Case in point: the persecution of Meryl Nass, MD, in the state of Maine by its Board of Licensure in Medicine. Dr. Nass is an internal medicine physician and a recognized expert in bioterrorism who famously uncovered the origin of the mysterious "Gulf War Syndrome" as a reaction to the US Army's own anthrax vaccine. She has testified before Congress and in many state legislatures about vaccine safety. After the emergence of Covid-19, Dr. Nass spoke out and blogged about the dangers of the new vaccines, and in favor of early treatment protocols using ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Her outspokenness attracted the ire of Maine Governor Janet Mills, and Mills's sister, Dora Anne Mills, the "Chief Health Improvement Officer" at Maine Health, a huge network of twelve hospitals, 1,700 doctors, and 22,000 employees, deeply invested in the Covid vaccine program.
In January of this year, Dr. Nass's license was suspended by the Licensure Board based on complaints by two "activists" that she was "spreading misinformation" and for her use of early treatment protocols with her own patients. The board compelled Dr. Nass to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation to determine if she was a drug abuser or suffered from mental illness. (Flag that, since it implies official defamation of her character.) The board accused her of "fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation" in her practice, "conduct that evidences a lack of ability or fitness," and being "an immediate jeopardy" to public health.
For most of this year, the board refused to entertain any defense by Dr. Nass against her suspension until a hearing held last week, October 11, when she appeared before the Licensure Board with her attorney, Gene Libby. The hearing in its entirety can be watched on video at Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s Children's Health Defense website. (The first two-thirds the board prosecutes its case; the last hour Dr. Nass presents her defense.) Days before the hearing, the Licensure Board withdrew all the "misinformation" charges against Dr. Nass without explanation and now bases its case on Dr. Nass's use of early treatment protocols.
The hearing was highly instructive on the tactics and strategies for defeating official persecutions against doctors in America (and broadly across all of Western Civ these days), since the Maine licensure Board acted with obvious ignorance and malice that is easily revealed. Dr. Nass's attorney Gene Libby deftly got the Board on-record attesting to their own deliberate misconduct. For instance, he repeatedly invoked their charges against "spreading misinformation," forcing the chair, an eye doctor named Maroulla S. Gleaton, to affirm that the charges had been precipitously dropped days before. There was also some lively discussion of the board's imputations against Dr. Nass's mental health and insinuations of drug abuse — Dr. Nass testified that she'd never been treated for mental health issues, had never taken pharmaceuticals for them, never took illicit drugs or been accused of it, and, where alcohol was concerned, enjoyed "about five drinks a year."
Watch the video. I think you can see that the Licensure Board members begin to realize in the proceeding that Dr. Nass is fixing to sue the living shit out of them, and that just about everything they've said implicates them in a malice-driven campaign to defame her. In fact, it may be appropriate as events move forward for a court to recommend suspending the medical license of board chair Maroulla S. Gleaton, and the several other board members who are doctors (some are not) for official misconduct, as well as paying damages to Dr. Nass.
The archbishops, confessors, and torturers in the Inquisitions of yore had, in retrospect, at least one excuse for their misdeeds (what we might call today "crimes against humanity"): empirical science was then in its infancy and their ideas about how the world worked were still largely driven by myth, fear, and occultism. Until fairly recently, when Western Civ went off-the-rails, the thinking classes of America would have easily labeled the activities of the old Inquisition as a form of group insanity.
Alas, the thinking classes across Western Civ have now gone insane. Today, they are the ones perpetrating real crimes against humanity. They have given themselves permission — as elites will — to behave cruelly, unjustly, and idiotically against the public interest and against the inherent rights of individuals to fair treatment. They've subjected millions to injury and death. They've maintained the fraudulent "Emergency Use Authorization" (EUA) for hugely profitable, ineffective, and dangerous drugs by prohibiting treatments with proven effective drugs — the use of which would nullify the EUA and the legal protections it affords the drug-makers. They've concealed the statistics that would show all that. And they appear to be acting with arrant malice driven by political actors offstage.
Dr. Nass is demonstrating how they can be effectively opposed. There should be thousands of heroic figures like her among the doctors of Western Civ. Ask them why they are not standing up in places like California, with its new, idiotically-written law against doctors speaking freely with their patients for the sake of informed consent ("spreading misinformation"). These reprobate lawmakers — and the depraved Governor Gavin Newsom who signed the act — need a lesson in what it means to be civilized. The people running the CDC, the NIH, and the FDA deserve severe floggings in the civil and criminal courts. They all know it now, too, and they're running scared.
Reader Comments
Yes, they deserve flogging and they know it. But as for running scared, I'm not too sure of that. They still see themselves as untouchable. That is why Ontario's (and others) governing boards are still threatening doctors with dismissal for the so called misinformation.
We need to pull down the medical establishment before we are trapped into it. Should it fall then many innocent sick people will die without care. Most of those vaxxed will succumb to their vaxx-induced diseases anyway, with or without 'medical' care.
'Survival of the fittest' will make a return.
If nuclear weapons are again used (and everyone knows the only country to have used them), these believers will blame their use on Russia, even though Russia has made it very clear that it would only resort to such weapons if the country’s existence were threatened, while the U.S. continues affirming its right to preemptively use nuclear weapons when it so chooses.
And even if nuclear weapons are not used, the recent sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines and the bombing of the Crimean Bridge, both clearly the work of U.S./NATO/Ukrainian forces, have raised the ante considerably. The door to hell has just been opened wider, and I suspect not by accident, as the U.S. elections approach.
Putin said:
They [the U.S./NATO/Ukraine] have even resorted to the nuclear blackmail. I am referring not only to the Western-encouraged shelling of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, which poses a threat of a nuclear disaster, but also to the statements made by some high-ranking representatives of the leading NATO countries on the possibility and admissibility of using weapons of mass destruction – nuclear weapons – against Russia.
I would like to remind those who make such statements regarding Russia that our country has different types of weapons as well, and some of them are more modern than the weapons NATO countries have. In the event of a threat to the territorial integrity of our country and to defend Russia and our people, we will certainly make use of all weapon systems available to us. This is not a bluff.
[Link]
SOMEHOW, WITH REGARDS TO THIS WEST LIFE, WITH TRANNYS, CROSS DRESSING FUKD UP SHITHEAD MEDICAL PPLE THAT BUTHER KIDS FOR CASH, MAN TO WOMAN, = IMPOSSIBLE, WOMAN TO MAN = IMPOSSIBLE, BUT THE WESTERN MENTAL ISSUES, SERIOUSLY FUKD UP
REMINDER TO ALL, THE LAST 3 YRS, DEMOCRACY DIED AT LEAST A DECADE AGO, LIFE IS MORE FREE IN THE RUSSIA, MORE NATURAL BEAUTYS, LESS OF THE SILICON "KARENS", AN FKN SISSYS IN SKIRTS IN US MILITARY WITH A PEDO PRESIDENT.. FFS.. THE WEST IS DEAD, BEEN DEAD A LONG LONG TIME..
I STAND WITH OUR RUSSIAN FRIENDS, THAT SAVED ME, AND MY FAM FROM SPEAKING GERMAN BACK IN THE MID 40S, UK , USA WERE LOSING,
WITHOUT OUR RUSSIAN FRIENDS, THERE BE NO WEST,
WTF DONT THEY UNDERSTAND FFS!!
NATO Learns Nothing and Forgets Nothing NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg seems unable to free himself of his dangerous delusions
[Link]
(*: I don't mention the Biden puppet here... I don't know who the pupeteer is.)
Rand Paul introducing 'Fauci Amendment' to prevent 'health dictatorship'
Senator Rand Paul has announced that he intends to introduce an amendment in the Senate to prevent anyone from ever again becoming a health 'dictator in chief'. In an op-ed for Fox News, Paul...I feel the same about his dad; good guy, good ideas, but something not entirely on the level is working behind the scenes.
That is just my impression from listening to his many podcasts and press releases over the years.
And this is as old as the hills. The Catholic Inquisition had "The Law" on its side. And in the 19th Century Charles Dickens in Oliver Twist has Mr. Bumble say: “ If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble,… “the law is a ass—a idiot. "
I will be pleasantly surprised - shocked - if the good Dr. Nass prevails against members of "The Board" in their capacity as "Government Officers."
The Nuremberg Laws disallowing guilt on the basis of "Following Orders" were applied only once in history - at Nuremberg - and have been tossed in the garbage ever since. If you have a dispute with Government, you are SOL. The Court is also a branch of Government, and Government makes The Law. So abandon that vain hope of forlorn justice.
However, when the Government has a dog in the fight, like in the cases of Julian Assange or Bradley Manning, one does not stand much of a chance. I never understood in the Bradley Manning case why his lawyers did not use the defense that to witness a crime, and not report it, is itself a crime, so that Manning was simply doing his civic duty as mandated by the law.
Bradley Manning was tried in military court . Maybe that defense("to witness a crime, and not report it, is itself a crime") would not have been applicable? [Link]
Knowing what I know about the CIA, for anyone to become the Director of that crime syndicate they have to be warped in their minds. But to call lying, cheating and stealing akin to the "glory of the American Experiment" is an atrocity. Perhaps, with such people in positions of power, we can understand why our country is in the state it's in today. All the clips I can find cut off at the same point. If you can find a longer clip where he continues from there, please get back to me. Thanks.