
© Reuters/Yana PaskovaDemocratic 2020 US presidential candidate and US Senator Bernie Sanders.
Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has said that
he would not use the Espionage Act to prosecute government whistleblowers in a promise hailed by activists as crucial to maintaining press freedom.The controversial 1917 law was rarely used in modern times until former US President Barack Obama dug it up to prosecute eight people accused of leaking to the media โ more than all other US presidents combined. So far, Donald Trump has also used the law to prosecute eight whistleblowers, putting him on track to outdo Obama if he wins a second term in 2020.
"Whoa," tweeted NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in response. Snowden was himself charged under the Espionage Act for his major disclosures on mass surveillance by the US government.
Sanders made the comments in an interview with the Intercept released on Tuesday. Asked whether it was right to prosecute whistleblowers using the law, Sander said,
"Of course not." He added that whistleblowers "have a very important role to play in the political process."The Espionage Act was originally used to go after conscientious objectors in World War I โ
and the fact that the law considers leakers to be spies "makes a fair trial impossible" since "relevant evidence is classified and kept from the defense," the Intercept wrote.
"This is the most important stance any candidate has taken affecting press freedom so far," tweeted Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
Strangely, however, the Intercept reporter did not ask Sanders specifically about Julian Assange, who is awaiting a US extradition hearing in a British prison for exposing US war crimes in Iraq โ and whose case is the most prominent and consequential example of the Espionage Act being used to quash whistleblowers and freedom of information.
Instead the interviewer focused on the 'Ukrainegate' whistleblower, whose complaint about a call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky prompted an impeachment inquiry โ and Reality Winner, the former NSA contractor who was sentenced to five years in prison for leaking classified information on alleged Russian 'interference' in the 2016 election.
Ironically, many in the US establishment have been quick to express support for whistleblowers if they are revealing information that is damaging to Trump, but not so enthusiastic about defending Assange, who released information damaging to Trump's rival Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Sanders himself previously condemned the use of the Espionage Act against Assange, calling it "a disturbing attack on the First Amendment" โ although the Vermont senator angered many when he did not make a statement after Assange was initially arrested at the Ecuadorian embassy in London in April.Sanders' later defense of Assange stood in stark contrast to that of Democratic frontrunner Elizabeth Warren, who condemned the Trump administration's move but also called Assange a "bad actor" who "should be held accountable."
By far the candidate who has been most vocal in support of Assange, however, has been rogue Democrat Tulsi Gabbard, who said the message his prosecution sends to Americans is that they must "be quiet" and "toe the line" otherwise "there will be consequences."
The BIG reason that we found out about FISA abuses was because the SS/DS felt it was so powerful that they could - as usual - lie with impunity and immunity - UNDER OATH. The fact that Trump won the election showed that... they'd have a few 'worrisome' nights, but none of those who lied to the FISA court will EVER EVEN BE CHARGED WITH A CRIME; NOT EVEN BY TRUMP's regime. (If they were to be so charged, they would have been so charged - all the way up to Killary - long ago.
So why not? As I've said before, the Dems say: You try to pull those sheets, you KNOW you'll find 'big' Dick Cheney doing a 69 with Killary - or hell, maybe Bill!
So nada's gonna change. Our last best hopes are:
Tulsi gets elected and kicks ass; OR,
Trump gets a conscience, uses what wealth he has to protect himself; and he then works to ensure that the whole ugly mess - all the way back to the end of Jimmy Carter - is revealed. If so, Trump better have a Trump Tower secured for Beiruit in 82 - nay, Berlin in 45 conditions.
R.C.