OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
A tempest in a teapot. Who cares ? But hey, it's the NYP ...
Surely nanny states are not the way. But hey, here we are: Name a country that does not have this in some form or another.
'They Are The Dark; We Are the Light' The more we know, the closer we are to the end of tyranny by ELIZABETH NICKSON APR 28, 2024 [Link] . "This...
Both should be fired, but Jean-Pierre definitely. She is arrogant , ill-informed , and rude to reporters.
"Look him in the Eyes.....Nonsense. . how do I read that ? I read it as it written, as if it said, "look him in the eyes and tell him you really...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
WTF?
Then again, lots of single males or females could 'claim' to get 'married' so as to get Social Security benefits or, these days, damn near as important, health insurance.
The US Supreme court's decision in the Kentucky case re the clerk refusing to issue gay marriage permits was NOT the proper case for that issue as it was not raised sufficiently in the lower courts by the same standards the US Sup. Court ROUTINELY uses as an excuse to avoid deciding on cases that will get the PTB mad at them, such as cases (what few there have been) claiming the OBVIOUSLY unconstitutional 'Patriosh*t Act and NDAA' (which essentially is a law claiming that for reasons of "National Security' (the phrase must only be placed on a piece of paper by a US Attorney) and then the courts will NOT hear the issue of whether being AN AMERICAN illegally kidnapped and murdered via torture, constitutes a violation of your 'constitutional rights'.. (And if you're dead, then the state attorneys argue: 'What's it matter? Dead people do not have constitutional rights to live, etc."
And they claim, with straight face: "And the issue of who killed them - i.e., the US or its 'agents' - is not for this court to be allowed to consider, even if the facts proved that the person was executed a la the VC shot with a 38 special snubnose in vietnam by one of 'our' strongment.
Think about it for the US position isn't simply that it has the right to kill foreigners overseas, nor is it that they have to right to torture and kill Americans overseas, NO! They flat out argue - in the most obvious and egregious application of the claim that we are the 'indispensable' state - they claim, again, straight faced, that the US Executive Branch has the right to kidnap American Citizens at home.. drag them to some black site in some ship in international waters (or on land, too,for example, Saudi Arabia) and there slowly torture them to death and that those people so grabbed (e.g., 'What became of Baybars?'*
R.C.
*Granted, odds are against it, at least now. But whenever this sh*t has begun happening it is always that folks just start to 'disappear,' and then the numbers get so high that the folks get together and realize (like the Argentinian Mothers of the Missing still do - and those were OUR Torturing Murdering Scumbag psychopaths, who learned the i ntricacies of torture at Ft. Benning, GA's 'School of the AmeriKaz'.
RC