Party censorship: Fmr Google techie violates Twitter's abuse policies, gets free pass

zanting
steemit
Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:34 UTC

Kelly Ellis

Collusion at Twitter between abusive users & employees continues seemingly unabated - a recent admission showcasing such inherent problems within the corporation.

Kelly Ellis, an e-celebrity of sorts within the tech industry, made semi-famous by past sexual harassment at Google - is once again in the spotlight of one-sided employee collusion at Twitter.

Ellis recently got into a short 3-Tweet argument with MicroChip™ regarding an ongoing campaign to hold Twitter accountable, where she indicated that she was making her friends on the Twitter Trust & Safety team aware, of him & the campaign.

Undoubtedly, this is an admission of direct collusion with Twitter Trust & Safety - specifically.

This is a rather grave conflict of interest, as Ellis previously indicated that she hoped U.S. President Donald Trump would be assassinated or die very painfully, yet received no suspension:

This type of speech is definitively against both the old as well as new Twitter Rules.

Violent threats (direct or indirect): You may not make threats of violence or promote violence, including threatening or promoting terrorism.

It also isn't the first time Ellis has Tweeted about wanting Trump to die:

The account she is replying to (Rusty Foster), which has been set to private, seemingly indicates a potential affiliation with ANTIFA.

When these posts were Tweeted out by Ellis, she was being followed by Twitter Anti-Abuse (Support) Manager Alex Wu, which makes this a rather blatant example of double standards. Especially given now admitted direct ties to Twitter Trust & Safety.

Ellis later lied about being followed by Wu:

Despite him still following her as of this posting.

This also isn't the first time an admission of collusion has been made, either:

Previously Ellis has also admitted to being in contact with Ed Ho, Twitter's GM, disclosed old messages between each other & vehemently complained that he wasn't doing enough to "protect her." Tweets.

Such complaints primarily stem from her Tweets that are at the very heart of this story, whereby her saying Trump should be assassinated or alternatively die as painfully as possible; which could imply torture, lead to amplification of & backlash regarding her words. Undoubtedly, then claiming to be the victim of harassment after technically engaging in the same & even far worse behavior - is how a child would likely respond.

UPDATE: Kelly Ellis has praised action taken by a Twitter Support employee, who briefly deactivated U.S. President Donald Trump's personal Twitter account, allegedly on their last day at the corporation.

Ellis also appears to be colluding with Randi Harper, who is offering "services" to the employee, in an attempt to prevent them from being identified or held accountable for their actions.

This is rather troubling since the employee may have broken the law given government contracts with Twitter.

Comment: So apparently it's okay to promote violence as long as your political leanings are aligned with those that run the site. Never mind the rules, they only apply to those who don't agree with their stance. Otherwise, you might just have a "happy little accident."

From one of the above links:

Keep in mind the above tweets are exactly the type of thing that its Mr. Wu's job to take down and punish. Instead of course because she is on the correct side politically in Alex's mind not only does Kelly get a pass. She actually gets a follow from this Twitter higher up. In many ways it's one of the most blatant signs yet, that Twitter openly forces Conservatives and Liberals to play by two very different sets of rules. Things get even worse when you learn that Kelly has also used the platform to openly donate money to Domestic Terror Organization Antifa.

See also: Social media hive mind: How Twitter 'throttles' content that disagrees with their political views