Puppet Masters
On October 16, Shoigu arrived Israel for meetings with Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The sides were reportedly set to discuss the situation in the region, including Syria, the fight against terrorism as well as military and technical cooperation.
At the same day, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) claimed that its warplanes targeted an anti-aircraft battery of the Syrian Air Defense Forces that had launched a missile at Israeli aircraft flying over Lebanon.
The IDF added that the Syrian missile didn't hit any Israeli aircraft.
"The army targeted the battery with four bombs and, according to the IDF, the battery was damaged to the extent it was no longer operational. The army said the battery targeted was the same that fired at Israeli jets last March, prompting Israel make use of its Arrow anti-missile system for the first time," the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reportedon the issue.
The Syrian military confirmed the Israeli strikes and said that they caused "material damage."
It's interesting to note that, according to the Syrian Defense Ministry statement, Israeli warplanes violated Syria's airspace on the border with Lebanon in Baalbek area. The incident took place at 8:51 am local time.
Could the Israeli Air Force intentionally provoke the reaction from the Syrian military in order to justify the strike on the Syrian air defense battery?
Furthermore, some pro-Israeli experts and media activists clearly linked the incident with the visit of the Russian defense minister to Tel Aviv saying that it was a nice demonstration of power to the Russian-Iranian-Syrian alliance.
However, something went wrong.
According to the available information, the Syrian Defense Forces used a S-200 missile against the Israeli warplane. This Soviet-made missile is the most advanced long range anti-aircraft system opearated by the Syrian military. Even in this case, it's old-fashioned in terms of the modern warfare.
Despite this, the Syrian Defense Ministry said in its statement that government forces responded to the violation of the airspace and "directly hit one of the jets, forcing [Israeli aircraft] to retreat." This statement contradicts to the Israeli claim that "no hit" was confirmed.
Few hours after the missile incident with Syria, the Israeli media reported that the Israeli Air Force's F-35 stealth multirole fighter went unserviceable as a result of an alleged bird collision during a training flight.
The incident allegedly took place "two weeks ago" but was publicly reported only on October 16. However, Israeli sources were not able to show a photo of the F-35 warplane after the "bird collision".
Furthermore, it is not clear if the F-35 can become operational again because its stealth coating was damaged. Thus, according to the Israeli version, the warplane reportedly became no longer operational after the bird collision despite the fact that the F-35 earlier passed the bird strike certification with great results (official info here). The F-35 is the world's most expensive warplane. The price of developing the F-35 is now about $406.5 billion.
Israel is actively buying the world's self-proclaimed most advanced fighter paying about $100 million for each plane.
So what did really hit the F-35?
Comment: Iran's Military Chief has warned Israel against violating Syrian airspace in the wake of this week's attack of Israeli Air Force on an anti-aircraft battery in Syria.
"It's not acceptable for the Zionist regime to violate the land and airspace of Syria anytime it wants," Baqeri said during a news conference with his Syrian counterpart Ali Abdullah Ayoub in Damascus on Wednesday, and promised to increase cooperation with the Syrian military "to confront our common enemies, the Zionists and terrorists".See also: Syrian armed forces intercept Israeli warplanes near Lebanese border - Netanyahu says targeting Israeli jets by Syrians unacceptable
The sides established the board lines for this cooperation.
Reader Comments
Thus we are talking a 50 year old missile design perhaps actually striking the Israeli jet. (We know they would lie about that if such did occur.)
So 50 year old Soviet Tech, did this. Since then, the Russians are now past S-300, S-400 and have functional S-500's that they keep at home. You gotta wonder if it would survive even an S-300: (a 40 year old tech. missile; or the even more advanced and recent S-400 OR 500. ("5th Generation.")
Likely not, since Russia tends to use its weapons, and surprise the west at how much better they are than expected, while the US MIC tends to extol the supposed 'superiority' of its weapons, which routinely fail to live up to MIC promises, despite standardized cost overruns of 100 - 1000%.
R.C.
*Wiki Pee Pee Ahh...
RC






I see a fail in the F-35 engagement tally, I am sure the list of F-35 failures is going to become even longer.
If you are sucking at the F-35 hype teat... this sort of fail in operation should be well down the engagement roster, not right at the top.