Society's Child
Attorney Duncan Fobes told Mount Vernon School District that it could face costly litigation, which it would likely lose, if it prevented the The Satanic Temple from holding after-school programs for children at its facilities, the Skagit Valley Herald has reported.
The Temple announced its intention to hold the clubs earlier this year in response to a Supreme Court ruling allowing evangelical religious programs to operate in schools.
Nine clubs, including one in Mount Vernon, have been set up around the US and the Temple said they are specifically targeting schools which host a Good News Bible Club. The interdenominational Christian program operates in more than 3,500 public schools across the US.
Satanic Temple of Seattle spokesperson Tarkus Claypool said a parent brought the Bible club to its attention over concerns the club was teaching children to evangelize to other children, KOMO reports.
One of The Satanic Temple's founders, Lucien Greaves, said the after-school clubs try to bring diversity to the religious opinions children are exposed to in school. He claimedthe Good News Club instills children "with a fear of Hell and God's wrath."
The religious freedom campaign group says it does not believe in or worship Satan but instead views him as a metaphor for rebellion and rational inquiry. The group recently made headlines for establishing their headquarters in Salem, Massachusetts, the town famous for the colonial era witch trials.
However, at a Mount Vernon School Board meeting this week, concerned parents spoke out against the Temple's application for an afterschool club.
Mike Cheek, who has grandchildren in the district, said, "This is going to be infectious and widespread... I know that if there is anything to do with Satan, it is dark and it is evil."
The district cannot ban the club from school property unless it uses hate speech, incites violence or includes pornography.
Board President Rob Coffey said the district's hands are tied. "We must make our facilities available... We must make them available whether we like the group or not. There really is no opportunity for us to say no to the Satanic Temple or the After School Satan Club."
Reader Comments
This 'Satanic Church' is Satanism's version of the Universal Unitarian Church. It stands for nothing, and believes nothing (which will, no doubt, make it highly popular!) It's 'dedicated to Satanic practice', but asserts there is no such thing as Satan. It's dedicated to rationality, benevolence, empathy, common sense, and justice, while rejecting inquiry into what these non-material ideals might be founded in. It empowers 'individual will' driven by personal conscience, but hasn't a clue what constitutes a conscience, or why it should exist. It enshrines 'science', but is entirely naive of the extent to which modern science is constrained by belief (hypothesis.) It asserts that people are 'fallible', but has no basis for understanding what the subjective experience of 'failure' is founded in. It rejects the 'supernatural' but embraces supernatural symbology that points emphatically to experiences they claim have no reality. It embraces 'relentless inquiry', but emphatically limits such inquiry to sense-based experience. It warns against 'belief' as being the equivalent of 'submission', but advocates for belief in submission to a materialistic belief system. It proclaims its 'outsider status', promoting the idea that each individual should be free to define Satanism however they want, but acknowledges that it serves the human need for unifying practice and community, and promotes political activism, which is nothing other than the power of the group to define the social experience of the whole group.
In short, this "church" is designed to appeal to the most naive and self-deluded of people, who imagine that they can spout words based on inner experience, without acknowledging the reality of an inner world. If it was freedom that they actually supported, they would advocate for providing children examples and models of instances in which people rely on belief to guide their actions (whether those beliefs are traditionally religious or materialistic,) and provide feedback regarding behavior choices and their effects, but otherwise leave them alone to formulate their beliefs in their own time and their own way. Invasions of this freedom include saluting the flag, singing songs of loyalty to the school or government, reciting pledges, or wearing, drawing, or promoting the colors/symbols of a particular group's belief system. And yes, this includes the inverted pentagram! Premature indoctrination short-circuits the essential process of forming adult judgment, leaving people vulnerable to the psychopathic monsters that make use of childhood indoctrination to manipulate and control adults.
an inconvenient thing for Christian propagandists? They canonize fallen soldiers, who die 'for' our constitution/country, yet want to deny the rights guaranteed in it. As for Satanists being pure evil...well, just listen to those same 'Christians' cackle about the deaths of thousands of innocent Muslims and their championing of the criminal state of Israel...as if they have the moral high ground. If they had just stayed out of the schools, this 'problem' would never have occurred. Don't even get me started on child abuse/paedophilia and the 'church'...and I do mean all of them. So, again, who's evil?