The base was attacked a second time on Monday, CNN reported.
The New York Times reported:
In a conference call with reporters, Colonel Warren said the Marines were not combat forces because they were positioned at the outpost to provide "force protection" to American military advisers working alongside Iraqi troops. "They won't kind of go off and conduct any type of mission on their own," he said, referring to the Marines. "They don't really have that capability anyways. They're just providing coverage, right? They're providing fire support coverage for the several thousand Iraqi soldiers and the several hundred advisers.""Force protection" is military jargon for providing security. But the U.S. military has long contracted out its security in Iraq to foreign workers—a policy that has been met with harsh criticism from human rights and labor activists, among many others.
Comment: The base is known as Fire Base Bell. A military firebase or fire support base is a temporary military encampment (although some evolve into permanent bases) to provide artillery fire support to infantry operating in areas beyond the normal range of fire support from their own base camps. It is located several hundred meters from the the Iraqi base and obviously vulnerable.
Observers have noted that the DoD's hiring of private contractors in Iraq has only increased under President Obama's watch. Indeed, a glance at Department of Defense contracts reveals that as recently as January, the Pentagon hired a private contractor to provide security to the Balad Iraqi Air Force base. It remains unclear why marines would be deployed to provide security, when the Pentagon appears to continue to rely almost solely on private contractors instead of American soldiers to do that particular job.
Moreover, two defense officials characterized the marines' mission very differently in comments to Daily Beast: these particular marines "were deployed near the front lines of what is expected be the biggest battle of the war"..."tasked to launch a mission that signaled the U.S. was again furtively expanding its mission in Iraq," the officials said.
Just as with prior escalations of force, the Obama administration continues to argue that the president has still not broken his promise not to put "boots on the ground" in Iraq. And yet the U.S. Central Command also quietly announced Sunday that it would be deploying an additional detachment of marines to Iraq. It did not state how many troops would be in this new deployment.
Currently, more than 4,000 American soldiers are deployed in the country, according to Military.com. It remains unclear at what point the Department of Defense would describe the U.S. military presence in Iraq as "boots on the ground."




Comment: How can you be in combat and not have "boots on the ground?" Here's how:
The actual number of US troops in Iraq, to avoid appearances of an expanding US combat mission, means there are units that do not appear on the books as ground troops due to the military's accounting system and how a soldier is "assigned." This plays into a subterfuge to the American public of keeping the number of "boots" in line with public rhetoric while continuing to grow military presence in the region.
In this case, there are about 200 marines to "guard" less than 100 advisors. Troops that rotate in and out of bases on short term assignments are not counted. Troops with dual abilities, such as working at an embassy, foreign military sales, defense support missions are not included, according to Col. Steve Warren, spokesman for the U.S. military headquarters in Baghdad. He stated the outpost had been kept a secret because the Pentagon wanted to give the Marines a chance to "become fully operational" and "ready to fight."
There are currently more than 4,000 US soldiers in Iraq and increasing. They call it "mission creep." Something's simmering behind the scenes and the public is not privy.