Instead, days before the annual autumn re-freeze is due to begin, an unbroken ice sheet more than half the size of Europe already stretches from the Canadian islands to Russia's northern shores. The Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific has remained blocked by pack-ice all year. More than 20 yachts that had planned to sail it have been left ice-bound and a cruise ship attempting the route was forced to turn back.
Some eminent scientists now believe the world is heading for a period of cooling that will not end until the middle of this century - a process that would expose computer forecasts of imminent catastrophic warming as dangerously misleading.
The disclosure comes 11 months after The Mail on Sunday triggered intense political and scientific debate by revealing that global warming has 'paused' since the beginning of 1997 - an event that the computer models used by climate experts failed to predict.
In March, this newspaper further revealed that temperatures are about to drop below the level that the models forecast with '90 per cent certainty'.
The pause - which has now been accepted as real by every major climate research centre - is important, because the models' predictions of ever-increasing global temperatures have made many of the world's economies divert billions of pounds into 'green' measures to counter climate change.
Those predictions now appear gravely flawed.
There won't be any ice at all! How the BBC predicted chaos in 2007
Only six years ago, the BBC reported that the Arctic would be ice-free in summer by 2013, citing a scientist in the US who claimed this was a 'conservative' forecast. Perhaps it was their confidence that led more than 20 yachts to try to sail the Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific this summer. As of last week, all these vessels were stuck in the ice, some at the eastern end of the passage in Prince Regent Inlet, others further west at Cape Bathurst.
Shipping experts said the only way these vessels were likely to be freed was by the icebreakers of the Canadian coastguard. According to the official Canadian government website, the Northwest Passage has remained ice-bound and impassable all summer.
The BBC's 2007 report quoted scientist Professor Wieslaw Maslowski, who based his views on super-computer models and the fact that 'we use a high-resolution regional model for the Arctic Ocean and sea ice'.
He was confident his results were 'much more realistic' than other projections, which 'underestimate the amount of heat delivered to the sea ice'. Also quoted was Cambridge University expert Professor Peter Wadhams. He backed Professor Maslowski, saying his model was 'more efficient' than others because it 'takes account of processes that happen internally in the ice'.
He added: 'This is not a cycle; not just a fluctuation. In the end, it will all just melt away quite suddenly.'
The continuing furore caused by The Mail on Sunday's revelations - which will now be amplified by the return of the Arctic ice sheet - has forced the UN's climate change body to hold a crisis meeting.
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was due in October to start publishing its Fifth Assessment Report - a huge three-volume study issued every six or seven years. It will now hold a pre-summit in Stockholm later this month.
Leaked documents show that governments which support and finance the IPCC are demanding more than 1,500 changes to the report's 'summary for policymakers'. They say its current draft does not properly explain the pause.
At the heart of the row lie two questions: the extent to which temperatures will rise with carbon dioxide levels, as well as how much of the warming over the past 150 years - so far, just 0.8C - is down to human greenhouse gas emissions and how much is due to natural variability.
In its draft report, the IPCC says it is '95 per cent confident' that global warming has been caused by humans - up from 90 per cent in 2007.
This claim is already hotly disputed. US climate expert Professor Judith Curry said last night: 'In fact, the uncertainty is getting bigger. It's now clear the models are way too sensitive to carbon dioxide. I cannot see any basis for the IPCC increasing its confidence level.'
She pointed to long-term cycles in ocean temperature, which have a huge influence on climate and suggest the world may be approaching a period similar to that from 1965 to 1975, when there was a clear cooling trend. This led some scientists at the time to forecast an imminent ice age.
Professor Anastasios Tsonis, of the University of Wisconsin, was one of the first to investigate the ocean cycles. He said: 'We are already in a cooling trend, which I think will continue for the next 15 years at least. There is no doubt the warming of the 1980s and 1990s has stopped.
'The IPCC claims its models show a pause of 15 years can be expected. But that means that after only a very few years more, they will have to admit they are wrong.'
Others are more cautious. Dr Ed Hawkins, of Reading University, drew the graph published by The Mail on Sunday in March showing how far world temperatures have diverged from computer predictions. He admitted the cycles may have caused some of the recorded warming, but insisted that natural variability alone could not explain all of the temperature rise over the past 150 years.
Nonetheless, the belief that summer Arctic ice is about to disappear remains an IPCC tenet, frequently flung in the face of critics who point to the pause.
Yet there is mounting evidence that Arctic ice levels are cyclical. Data uncovered by climate historians show that there was a massive melt in the 1920s and 1930s, followed by intense re-freezes that ended only in 1979 - the year the IPCC says that shrinking began.
Professor Curry said the ice's behaviour over the next five years would be crucial, both for understanding the climate and for future policy. 'Arctic sea ice is the indicator to watch,' she said.
Comment: This comes as no surprise to SOTT's regular readers since we've been disputing so-called global warming for years. Here's just a few recent articles to add to the mix:
Ice delays supply barge for Western Arctic communities
Tom Coburn: I'm a 'man of science' and the Earth is moving into a 'mini-ice age'
Record cold in parts of Alaska
South American countries gripped by snow
Reader Comments
this article a lady calls into coasttocoast to say google earth shows the whole artic as melted. hmmmm. very interesting.
The obvious truth is coming home to roost.
Global Warming is a scam.
Have you seen the Central England Temperature Record? The longest maintained record of temperatures in the world is showing a fall in average temperature over the last decade or so of about 1 degree celcius, 1.8 Farenheit. What is scary is that this is just the begining of a collapse in mean global temperatures. It is going to get far worse. Far, far worse.
When will we realize that our puny civilization has nothing to do with global climate change?
All we do change energy that’s already here from one form to another. That change is what drives our machines and technology
.
It’s simple Physics which is the “law of conservation of energy” which states that the total energy of an isolated system cannot change—it is said to be conserved over time. Energy can be neither created nor destroyed, but can change form; for instance, chemical energy can be converted to kinetic energy. A consequence of the law of conservation of energy is that a perpetual motion machine of the first kind cannot exist. That is to say, no system without an external energy supply can deliver an unlimited amount of energy to its surroundings. This is something most Scientist should have learned in Elementary School.
And in College they should have learned “Thermodynamics”. In, thermodynamics, a closed system can exchange energy (as heat or work) but not matter, with its surroundings. An isolated system cannot exchange any heat, work, or matter with the surroundings, while an open system can exchange all heat, work and matter. For a simple system, with only one type of particle (atom or molecule), a closed system amounts to a constant number of particles. However, for systems which are undergoing a chemical reaction, there may be all sorts of molecules being generated and destroyed by the reaction process. In this case, the fact that the system is closed is expressed by stating that the total number of each elemental atom is conserved, no matter what kind of molecule it may be a part of.
So how do we generate more energy than is already here? Impossible!
I believe it’s time for all scientist to throw off this dogmatic religion of global warming and fuzzy mechanics of Einstein’s theory (which make all this crap possible) and realize the earth and all its systems are simply cyclical electromagnetic LaGrange points, which are governed by our Star. Which is the sole supplier of energy our bio system and all other planetary systems
“If Nature has defined the mechanics problem of the thrown ball in so elegant a fashion, might She have defined other problems similarly. So it seems now. Indeed, at the present time it appears that we can describe all the fundamental forces in terms of a Lagrangian. The search for Nature's One Equation, which rules all of the universe, has been largely a search for an adequate Lagrangian.”
Robert Kemp Adair
Luckily looks like all things are coming outof the cupboard now! Nature cannot be contradicted. Everything really does appear to be 'opening up' now in more ways than one!
to my Facebook page. The following day, several articles debunking this article and especially its author were published. It seems that Rose is a climate change/global warming denier and stretched many facts. Basically he is a shill for the denier movement. Last year was a record year for the polar ice caps melting, so a 60% rebound barely brings them back to "normal". People like Rose piss me off because by publishing twisted articles, he stymies any rational discussion of global cooling and makes those of us who consider the possibility to be lumped in with "conspiracy theorists" or at the very least as someone who thinks unscientifically.
[Link]
I also think you can look at the freaking satellite images and SEE.
Unscientifically?????
And your “scientific” reasoning is Facebook response and a “Blog” link that is now “down”. Come on.
Umm, groups like the IPCC piss me off because by publishing twisted research, they stymie any rational discussion of what the heck is going on.
Oh and they use the air of authority to push their agenda, nice to be on top of the politics of science, ain't it?
If you really are into a rational discussion of global cooling and are worried about being lumped in with conspiracy theorists, why would you buy the hype of a record year of the ice caps melting? Who told you, the IPCC or someone else from the "consensus"?
Anyway your site is down, can you paste it here or repost it?
"Some eminent scientists now believe the world is heading for a period of cooling that will not end until the middle of this century"
We are way overdue for our regular ice age. They generally last for about 100K years.
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
And one that is very scary:
ALL QUIET ALERT: With the Sun's disk almost completely devoid of sunspots, solar flare activity has come to a halt. Measurements by NOAA's GOES 15 satellite show that the sun's global x-ray emission, a key metric of solar activity, has flatlined:
The quiet spell is a bit strange because 2013 is supposed to be a year of solar maximum, with lots of flares and sunspots. Supporting this view are data from NASA-supported observatories which show that the sun's magnetic field is poised to flip--a long-held sign that Solar Max has arrived. Nevertheless, solar activity is low.
[Link]
A veritable bastion of truth... or NOT:
"Slate is a United States-based, English language online current affairs and culture magazine created in 1996 by former New Republic editor Michael Kinsley, initially under the ownership of Microsoft as part of MSN. On 21 December 2004 it was purchased by the Washington Post Company. Since 4 June 2008 Slate has been managed by The Slate Group, an online publishing entity created by the Washington Post Company to develop and manage web-only magazines.
Since June 2008, David Plotz has served as the editor of Slate. He had been the deputy editor to Jacob Weisberg, Slate's editor from 2002 until his designation as the Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of The Slate Group. The Washington Post Company's John Alderman is Slate's publisher.[6] Slate (ISSN 1091-2339), which is updated daily, covers politics, arts and culture, sports, and news. The magazine is known (and sometimes criticized) for adopting contrarian positions."
Jacob Weisberg, Chairman, Slate Group:
Weisberg is a frequent commentator on National Public Radio. He previously worked for The New Republic in Washington, D.C., was a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine and a contributing editor to Vanity Fair. He has also served as a columnist for the Financial Times. Early in his career, he worked for Newsweek in the London and Washington bureaus. Weisberg has also worked as a freelance journalist for numerous publications.
His brother is former CIA officer and television writer and producer Joe Weisberg.
In short, a member of the "second rank" journalists as defined in Protocol 12.
... about the Rose article debunkery:
The state of climate science: ‘fluxed up’ The title is my twist on what Dr. Judith Curry said in an email to David Rose in his latest article about the upcoming IPCC AR5 report:
Last night Professor Judith Curry, head of climate science at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, said the leaked summary showed that ‘the science is clearly not settled, and is in a state of flux’.
She goes on to say:
She said it therefore made no sense that the IPCC was claiming that its confidence in its forecasts and conclusions has increased.
For example, in the new report, the IPCC says it is ‘extremely likely’ – 95 per cent certain – that human influence caused more than half the temperature rises from 1951 to 2010, up from ‘very confident’ – 90 per cent certain – in 2007.
Prof Curry said: ‘This is incomprehensible to me’ – adding that the IPCC projections are ‘overconfident’, especially given the report’s admitted areas of doubt.
Professor Myles Allen also got in a few licks, Prof Allen said:
‘The idea of producing a document of near-biblical infallibility is a misrepresentation of how science works, and we need to look very carefully about what the IPCC does in future.’
Rose also took Dana Nuccitelli and John Abraham to task at the Guardian over ugly death threat type comments that remain about their rebuttal to his article last week, while other comments are removed for not meeting “standards”.
There's way more to read here:
[Link]
In short, the hatchet men have been sent out to do "damage control" because Rose is telling the truth - or pretty darn close to it.
it's almost comical how absolutely nothing this government and it's propaganda media put out there is ever true, it's all lies, manipulations, it's like someone said recently of McCain "doing evil is his dailey bread" - it's all of them. They wanted Cap & Trade so bad, it would make them 100s of billions $$$ on the backs of working poor - which is just about all of us anymore. Yes, if it is coming out of Washington DC or showing up on your tell-a-vision, you can bet your life it is a lie intended to hurt you somehow. My question is this, with the people waking up and seeing through the lies at some point, will be able to see the perpetrators of these deliberate untruths stand trial and go to jail? I am talking about the Scott Pelleys and Brian Williams of this world.....once the dam breaks and it becomes clear to all that we've been lied to and manipulated, can these people be tried for treason or something, because it is a crime? They are all so evil.
There is nothing any lie machine can do about it no matter how hard they try to manipulate their smooze spiel.... Howja like the bite back Gore et al?