High Strangeness
Several videos were captured from different angles. Many skeptics alleged that the videos could be tricks. But, it's not yet explained how the same objects were filmed from different angles at the same time, questions Examiner.com.
One of the videos was captured outside the London BBC Radio 1 Building, while another was taken near the Tower Bridge.
The videos that were uploaded on YouTube by different people, gathered mixed reactions from viewers. A comment from one of the non-believers read like this: "Sorry, it doesn't even look particularly realistic. Adobe After-Effects is quite capable of producing this stuff even for amateurs."
Meanwhile, another viewer who seemed to be convinced by the video said, "Why is so difficult to all those people believe in UFOs images and videos like this? Almost 2 billion people believe in god and Jesus that never saw.. Its confuse."
Soon it hit the social networking sites as well. Christie Montero, who believes in the existence of UFOs, tweeted, "So more UFO's were spotted in london and they got da video on WSHH!!!!! See and ppl be thinkin I'm crazy when I say aliens are real."
Another person, with a user name 'UFO_Sighting', tweeted, "Are aliens getting less camera shy?"
There are some people who are questioning the phenomena. One of them tweeted, "Real Or Fake!? UFO's Spotted By Multiple People In London! (What do you think?)"
June 24: What's special?
It was on June 24, 1947, Kenneth Arnold, an amateur pilot, who witnessed a chain of nine objects while he was flying a small plane near Mount Rainier in Washington, according to Space.com.
Arnold said the size of the objects from the distance can be calculated as equivalent to 45 to 50 feet wider than an aeroplane. The mysterious objects flew between two mountains that were 50 miles apart in just 1 minute and 42 seconds, he said.
The objects were flying at a speed, which was three times faster than any man-made aircraft. This rules out the possibility of some stealth military aircraft as was the case in the past.
Once the objects disappeared, Arnold flew to Yakima in Washigton and informed the airport staff about the strange incident. Reporters interviewed him next day and the news spread across the country like a wildfire.
Check out the photos and videos below:
Reader Comments
It would be interesting to triangulate from the known locations to see how similar the formations and flight paths may be.
Spot on with every observation DJS. Watch out for more of these manipulations and deliberate 'events. They prey on willing minds and wishful thinking. Despite the obvious flaws, (such as copying Hollywood's take on UFO movements instead of the observed reality), this set up was clearly quite carefully planned both in execution and distribution. Unlike so much more believable footage, this material has received national/international news coverage. Smells of something...
I really wish it was not but this is too cleverly set up as a random event - especially with one video following another on You-tube to reinforce the impact and veracity of the first. The Telegraph (30 June) published a short paragraph at the end of their piece on it saying: 'A separate video posted by the same user, alymc01, is believed to have been shot from inside the offices of a visual effects company called The Mill. The firm creates special effects for the film industry'. This could be of course read as disinfo or as a disclaimer to get the journalist off the hook if the video is proved a hoax but it just may explain it all. In addition the fact that a small group of people are filmed looking at the sky is very easy to set up - just go out into a busy street and point at the sky and you will soon gather quite a crowd doing the same thing. The white orbs darting around were a good choice too - less crass than having CGI's of silver discs. So much genuine footage out there and this gets all the attention.
At this late date, why would anyone bother to fake a UFO sighting?
And why would anyone bother to comment on the veracity of recent videos? What's the point?
The huge situation now is that we have a history of modern sightings which exceeds half a century with NO factual explanations from most governments since the military people were silenced around 1950. It's totally kooky. We all know that the military is aware of this phenomenon, but now if they say anything somewhat truthful about it, it will make them look like fools. Not only do they look like fools for denying the reality of something long since proven to be real, but they also look like fools because apparently they have totally lost control of the planet's air space, and anything can fly through it at any time of the day or night without being touched or even identified.
If anyone is wondering why popular confidence in governments is falling, just look at the almost total unwillingness to be forthcoming on an issue that so obviously needs to be addressed. Even the governments who have released previously classified files on these matters have not come forward to tell us what they really know.
The debate at this point should not be over whether or not a video has been doctored, but over the implications of the continued unwillingness of government officials to be forthcoming on this and many other issues. Why is it so hard for them to come forward? What are they so afraid of?
Maybe nobody in position of power on a good retirement package wants to jepordise their position by discloseing the obvious, something to do with the Christian/Chatholic beliefs (all religions actualy)? It would upset a lot of very powerful people if alien life was verified.
They (religious) would also look like fools.
for some film school to practice learned techniques, adjust painted in objects to camera movement, brightness, colors, etc.
Like most here, I'm thinking... hoax. The "UFO's" in these videos appear animated and super-imposed with their astonishing speeds and movement. The witnesses and their dialogue could have been staged as well. I guess everyone around the world wants another NYC event to materialize. Even if they have to make one up themselves.
On 6/29 while watching the morning wather report I noticed the same type of lights in the shot over Chicago. I thought this was out of the ordinary so I started recording it. The lights are not usually in this background shot,(which the station uses just about every morning for the weather report.) I thought the lights were odd, but figured if there were anything to it surely some other people would bring attention to it, but we never heard anyone mention anything about it? I probably would not have put much further thought into it until I came acroos the pictures/video in this story on SOTT. I could not believe it when the clips from London seemed to show the exact type of lights that were in the sky here. I am not tech saavy so I do not know how to get the recorded video from our DVR to the computer, but if you can find a clip of the NBC (WMAQ local affilliate) morning news from 6/29/11 you can see the lights in the weather reports beginning around 7:18 am. The lights continue to remian in the shots/weather reports throughout the better part of that morning sometimes as just two lights and other times as three lights in a triangular pattern.









In the first one the camera operator makes sure to film every one else filming the skies (would you not keep the camera pointing up to lessen the chance of missing such a phenomena?!) . Then the camera is pointed skywards when the UFOs happen to be flying directly above where the camera is pointed.
In the second one, next to tower bridge I think, the flight path seems to 'off' as if they were super-imposed over the video.
I think multi location filming of the same UFO incidents (like in Jerusalem) is the next level of hoax, whether it is a guerilla marketing campaign or soft disclosure (which I believe it is), it is bringing the masses to the waterhole (Von Braun said this would happen) so the crocs can take a bite out of them, one way or another.
Digital video technology is now at such a high level of ability that it will be neigh on impossible to tell if it's genuine or not, and this can be used as an excuse to debunk genuine footage and to provide more fake footage. The only thing we can believe is our own eyes (and this isn't always true either!)