Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 28 Sep 2022
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness
Map

Health

First diagnostic test for long covid, detecting spike protein in blood, to launch in September. Or is it 'long vaccine'?

spike protein covid
The first diagnostic designed to identify patients with Long Covid has received CE-IVD marking in Europe, meaning it is ready for its formal launch in countries accepting the designation this month. It works by looking for "patterns of inflammatory marker expression" in the blood, and in particular for the Covid spike protein persisting in white blood cells. Business Wire has the story.
The simple blood test can help to objectively diagnose patients suffering from Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), commonly known as Long Covid. Developed by IncellDx, the test will be available to prescribers and patients in September through one of the world's largest providers of diagnostic services.

A CE Mark indicates that the incellKINE Long Covid In Vitro Diagnostic fulfills the requirements of relevant European product directives and meets all the requirements of the relevant recognised European harmonised performance and safety standards...

Comment: See also:




Microscope 1

Peer-reviewed study: 94% of vaccinated patients with subsequent health issues have abnormal blood

blood
© Shutterstock
Physicians in Italy studied the blood of patients who had been injected with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and found foreign matter long after vaccination, a new study shows.

The three doctors, all of whom are surgeons — Franco Giovannini, M.D., Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, M.D., and Giampaolo Pisano, M.D. — examined freshly drawn blood of more than a thousand patients using direct observation under microscopes to see what was happening in the blood.

Their results were published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research in August 2022.

Comment: Is this really a safety issue? Self-assembling nano-structures don't just show up in blood of vaccinated individuals by accident. It's hard to believe this was anything other than intentional.

See also:


Family

US life expectancy takes an unprecedented fall: Are mRNA "vaccines" to blame?

Life expectancy
According to the latest statistics reported by The New York Times1 August 31, 2022, life expectancy in the United States dropped precipitously in 2020 and 2021.

In 2019, the average life span of Americans of all ethnicities was nearly 79 years. By the end of 2021, two years into the COVID pandemic and one full year into the mass inoculation campaign, life expectancy had dropped to 76 — a loss of nearly three years. Even small declines in life expectancy of a tenth or two-tenths of a year mean that on a population level, a lot more people are dying prematurely than they really should be. And this was nearly THREE years or 35 times more.

Comment: With more information coming out day by day, it is beginning to look like Mercola might be right: The experimental mRNA COVID jabs could be one of most lethal drugs in medical history.


Syringe

Data leak reveals disturbing facts about mRNA vaccine instability and potential dangers

Vaccine
© "RF._.STUDIO/PEXELS"
A 14-minute video (above) that has been overlooked for nearly two years has now resurfaced, exposing stunning information about the COVID-19 jabs and why health officials don't want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists.

The reason, it turns out, is because the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots "is not intact." Both of these pose potentially serious problems. In an August 31, 2022, Substack article, Steve Kirsch explains1:

Comment: Given that the Pfizer stands to make $54 BILLION from these mRNA-based vaccine and other COVID "treatments", they will continue doing everything in their power to convince the population of the need for booster shots... no matter how dangerous or ineffective.


Syringe

'Unethical' and up to 98 times worse than the disease: Top scientists publish paradigm-shifting study about COVID-19 vaccines

covid 19 graphic
© Shutterstock
A team of nine experts from Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and other top universities has published paradigm-shifting research about the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and why mandating vaccines for college students is unethical.

This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.

The paper is co-authored by Dr. Stefan Baral, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University; surgeon Martin Adel Makary, M.D., a professor at Johns Hopkins known for his books exposing medical malfeasance, including "Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won't Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Heath Care"; and Dr. Vinayak Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist, who is a professor in the UCSF Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, as well as the author of over 350 academic and peer-reviewed articles.

Comment: See also:


Syringe

CDC admits post-vaccine myocarditis concerns that were labeled Covid misinformation are legit

Vaccine
© "RF._.STUDIO/PEXELS"
In context, the CDC's latest numbers about post-vax myocarditis represent a significant departure from last year's narrative pushed by health bureaucrats and the media.

When reports first surfaced in 2021 that some cases of myocarditis — the inflammation of the heart muscle, potentially leading to blood clots and heart attack or stroke — were potentially associated with the Covid-19 vaccine, the corporate media and its fact-checkers were quick to label them as misinformation, saying the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh its small risks.

A year later, though, the media can no longer deny that what they called misinformation actually has data to back it up. As Matt Shapiro detailed in his Substack post on the matter, "Last year's misinformation on vaccine-associated myocarditis in young men is this year's well-established fact."

According to Vaccine Safety Datalink surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted in 2022, within a week of receiving the "Dose 2 Primary Series" of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, there were 14 verified cases of myocarditis or pericarditis among the 102,091 males aged 16-17 who got the shot. Among the nearly 206,000 12-15-year-old males who received the same series, 31 cases were confirmed within a week.

Comment: See also:


Syringe

'Hot lots' turned getting Covid vax into Russian roulette

Covid-19 vaccination in Nice
© Eric Gaillard / Reuters
People wait to be given a Covid-19 vaccine in Nice, France, April 29, 2021.
This post is short, but it took twenty+ hours to research and edit. The source videos and other references are at the end. As I slowly crawled through these ideas, I created an essay you can read in just a few minutes. If you listen to the audio, you need to also look at the charts. Your life depends on knowing about this.

Before you get into the depressing stuff, watch this. It's accurate, up-to-date, and laugh-out-loud funny:


To to test their poisons, Pfizer and the other Pharma companies killed us like lab rats. "Hot lot" is a phrase they would rather you never hear. It refers to a defective product. A commercial example is baby spinach recalled for salmonella contamination. Imagine if the company was testing different doses of salmonella to find out how much was needed to kill you or make you sick.

Cookie

Eating behaviors of parents play a role in teens' emotional eating

family dinner
© Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain
Emotional eating, or eating as a coping mechanism for negative, positive, or stress-driven emotions, is associated with unhealthy dietary patterns and weight gain. A research article featured in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior discusses adolescent vulnerability to emotional eating and how various feeding practices used by parents, such as restriction, food as reward, and child involvement, influence eating behavior.

"Emotional eating was previously found to be more learned than inherited. This study examined not only the interaction between parents when feeding their children, but also what children learned from watching their parents eat," said lead author Joanna Klosowska, MSc, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

The initial study was conducted in 2017 with 218 families. Additionally, longitudinal data collected in 2013 were also available. One parent from each family completed the Child Feeding Questionnaire, as well as the Child Feeding Practices Questionnaire, and both adolescent and parent completed the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Emotion regulation was assessed with the Dutch version of the child-reported FEEL-KJ questionnaire. The adolescent's body weight and height were measured by researchers.

Comment: See also:


Cheeseburger

Ultraprocessed food — The worst choice for planet and health

fast food, burger
© UNSPLASH/ @robinstickel
According to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its allied Great Reset minions, a traditional whole food diet is not only "unsustainable" but "environmentally destructive."

A recent "food analysis" in The Guardian1 took aim specifically at organic pasture-fed beef and lamb, lambasting such farming practices for their extravagant land use while underperforming in terms of yield:
"Arable crops, some of which are fed to farm animals, occupy 12% of the planet's land surface. But far more land (about 26%) is used for grazing: in other words, for pasture-fed meat and milk. Yet across this vast area, farm animals that are entirely pasture-fed produce just 1% of the world's protein."
Animal foods in general, and organically produced ones in particular, The Great Resetters claim, must be replaced with produce genetically engineered for high yield and pest resistance, and protein alternatives made from insects, plants and synthetic biology. Overall, life on earth cannot be sustained, they say, unless we transition to what amounts to an ultraprocessed and highly unnatural diet.

Comment: See also:


Syringe

The statistical illusion of better pregnancy outcomes for vaccinated women

pregnant
© Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images
How can a lower still birth rate in 'vaccinated' pregnant women mean that they are at higher risk of a still birth? It is all about what stage of their pregnancy they get vaccinated - there is 'survivor bias' in those vaccinated late in pregnancy.

The following analogy is based on one used by colleague Prof Retsef Levi. Suppose we want to find out whether runners in a 40 km (that's 26-mile) marathon are more likely to finish the race if they are given a special vitamin drink during the race. To do this we set up a drinking station at 20 km where runners can pick up the drink if they wish. Suppose 200 runners start the race and we observe the following:
chart no drink
© Unknown
The first row represents the runners who do not take the drink and the second row represents the runners who do. So, there are 100 in each group; but, whereas 70 of those who take the drink complete the race (70%), only 48 of those who do not take the drink complete it (48%).

It seems clear that taking the drink increases the chances of completing the race. But this may not be the case.