The author of the above, Sandra Korn, explains that we need to give up on academic freedom in favor of academic justice:
Instead, I would like to propose a more rigorous standard: one of 'academic justice'. When an academic community observes research promoting or justifying oppression, it should ensure that this research does not continue.Sandra Korn did not achieve eminence after graduation from Harvard:
However, her idea took on a life of its own. For example, to some people, it is not enough that two thirds of teenagers agree with them. Consider this Guardian article:
Someone of a more optimistic disposition could be happy that two thirds of teenagers do not believe climate change is exaggerated. Instead, the author is fuming about one third of teenagers who have doubts and concerns about an important issue they are facing.
The proposed solution is to stop platforming climate denial. The definition of climate denial is ever-changing and constantly expanding.
Even content agreeing with global warming but questioning specific climate solutions is now considered harmful misinformation. Imran Ahmed from CCDH explains:
In this report, for the first time, researchers at the Centre for Countering Digital Hate have quantified the startling and important rise over the past five years in what we call "New Denial" — the departure from rejection of anthropogenic climate change, to attacks on climate science and scientists, and rhetoric seeking to undermine confidence in solutions to climate change. "New Denial" claims now constitute 70% of all climate denial claims made on YouTube, up from 35% six years ago.This piece explains that elections in 2024 are a threat:
You may recall that the WEF agenda contributor and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation adviser Adam Grant concluded that elections are bad for our democracy:
Should we feel sorry about doubting official stories, believing in freedom of speech, or questioning anything that does not make sense to us? Are we a danger to ourselves?
Should we be thankful to maximalist ideologues, demanding total obedience and refusing even an iota of questioning?









Reader Comments
In the USA this has been engineered from the beginning through educational changes. The No Child Left Behind of Bush and the Race to the Top/Common Core of Obama were to Federalize education (which is the province of the States). This enabled a "common" "indoctrination" into "global warming", "social activism", "white privilege", "systemic racism" that has bred the Sandra Korn's of today.
Let's not forget Edward Bernays. He was the one that created the PR to connect smoking a cigarette with women's right to vote, which was mostly successful. His quote from his book Propaganda. "“ The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society . Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized.
Always loved that quote by Icke.
FYI, saw this brilliant fellow on The Highwire last week and bought his book. I am about 1/3 of the way through, and its eyeopening to be sure. His main hypothesis is the JABS target the autobiographical regions of the brain that being the hippocampus, and shuts it off, thus resulting in the zombie like minds we see, that still repeat the covid narratives endlessly because they cannot, rewrite over the old material that us the unjabbed can.....
The Indoctrinated Brain: How to Successfully Fend Off the Global Attack on Your Mental Freedom Kindle Editionby Michael Nehls (Author), Naomi Wolf (Foreword)
[Link]