Trinity College Dublin said its research painted an "uncharacteristically upbeat picture for the planet" after finding models had failed to take into account all the elements of photosynthesis.
During photosynthesis, green plants use light energy from the sun to convert carbon dioxide, water and minerals into the sugars they need for growth.
Comment: Note that this article continues to push the easily debunked global 'boiling' propaganda model, but what's important is how the study's findings expose some of the critical flaws in that model.
Scientists thought climate change could weaken the process, but the new research suggests plants can adjust to the temperatures, efficiently absorbing carbon dioxide, producing extra nutrients, and continuing to thrive.
Comment: Temperature is but one factor that impacts plant life.
They found that on a global scale, the amount of carbon converted during photosynthesis could be up to 68 per cent greater by the end of the century compared to the start of the century, and 20 per cent more than some current models suggest.
Comment: Is this operating on the assumption that sunlight will remain steady or increase? What if, as has happened numerous times before, conditions in our atmosphere block out sunlight? Reduction of sunlight may contribute to ice ages - MIT study
Still a need to cut emissions
Silvia Caldararu, assistant professor at Trinity's School of Natural Sciences, said: "What our study shows is that ecosystems could take up more CO2 out of the atmosphere than previously thought, which would mean lower CO2 concentrations, so a less steep rise in temperature.
"So yes, that would give us a bit more time to reach net zero. But it is important to note that we predict a lot of this drawdown will happen towards the end of the century, while we need to cut emissions now, or possibly yesterday."
Plants take up a huge amount of carbon dioxide every year, slowing down the effects of climate change, but experts have been uncertain whether that would continue as the climate changes.
In recent years, observations have shown that the carbon dioxide uptake by plants is increasing, which is likely driven in part by increased vegetation growth caused by carbon rises.
Comment: Note that this is an actual data point, rather than a weak prediction based on a biased model. The same increase in growth can be seen in greenhouses which pump in CO2.
An increase in the ability of plants to absorb carbon dioxide not only removes it from the atmosphere, but more growth brings down land temperature and mitigating effects on climate change globally indirectly.
Although climate modellers have attempted to include estimates for this carbon sink, the researchers found that most models were not complex enough to understand the true resilience of plants to climate change.
Comment: Science is only just beginning to understand the incredible complexity of plant life, and climate: Fungi manipulate bacteria to enrich soil with nutrients
Researchers found that under the extreme RCP 8.5 warming scenario, a pathway where greenhouse gas emissions continue to grow unmitigated, plants would take a fifth more carbon dioxide from the air than currently expected.
The RCP 8.5 scenario predicts a temperature increase of about 4.3C by 2100, relative to pre-industrial temperatures.
However, the authors cautioned that land ecosystems only absorb about a quarter of human emissions, so the extra benefit would take that up to around 30 per cent.
Comment: And what of CO2 emissions, in addition to other gasses, from other sources, such as those emitted by volcanoes? Volcanoes, Earthquakes And The 3,600 Year Comet Cycle
They said it showed the importance of protecting forests and green areas and implementing planting schemes.
'Planting trees will not solve all our problems'
Dr Jรผrgen Knauer, of Western Sydney University, who headed the research team said: "These kinds of predictions have implications for nature-brd solutions to climate change such as reforestation and afforestation and how much carbon such initiatives can take up.
"Our findings suggest these approaches could have a larger impact in mitigating climate change and over a longer time period than we thought.
"However, simply planting trees will not solve all our problems. We absolutely need to cut down emissions from all sectors. Trees alone cannot offer humanity a get out of jail free card."
Comment: Indeed, why focus on planting more trees when scientists are only just beginning to learn how much biomass there actually is on our planet? Study finds hidden trees across Europe: A billion tons of biomass is overlooked today
Commenting on the research, Prof Simon Lewis, professor of global change science at University College London (UCL), said: "This is a good study, but the interpretation of what this means for the future carbon uptake from the atmosphere and into forests needs care.
"Faster growing trees tend to have shorter lifespans, so it is possible that we could see greater photosynthesis as this study shows, but without large additional increases in carbon stored on the land."
Prof Mark Maslin, professor of climatology at UCL, said the results did not change the need to get to net zero emissions as fast as possible.
The research was published in the journal Science Advances.
* Where I live people water and mow their yards from April to November. Think of the zillons of gallons of wasted water, the fuel used to mow, the resources to make that multi-thousand dollar mower all for something you NEVER EVER use--you only look at it. When I lived in the desert, the city cried about not having enough water but they still poured out this life giving substance on grass?