Puppet Masters
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday said before the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday that the vessels, which are anti-submarine ships, are unable to carry out their primary function.
Gilday told the panel on Wednesday, "I refuse to put an additional dollar against a system that would not be able to track a high-end submarine in today's environment."
He noted that the ships' anti-submarine warfare systems "did not work out technically," and that this move would save about $391 million according to a budget proposal.
Bloomberg reports that the nine ships are part of 16 littoral combat ships that were built for the Navy by Lockheed Martin and were intended to last 25 years at sea. Many of the ships set for retirement have only been in service for five years or less. Three of these ships were only commissioned in 2019: USS Indianapolis, USS Billings, and USS Wichita.
The nine littoral combat ships cost the Navy roughly $3.2 billion. However, the Navy projects it will save $4.3 billion that would have been spent on maintenance and upgrades for the vessels.
Reader Comments
Funny that instead of choosing one project, the Navy chose both - both of them failures in many aspects. Because maintenance would be so expensive, they "save" money by decommissioning them. Taxpayers are certainly happy.
But you know, the defense contractors need these new projects, be they advantageous or not. Think F-35.
Comment: This is not a new problem in U.S. Navy construction.
See also: Undeployable! USN's money-pit ship can't deliver munitions to deck nor launch F-35 fighters