OF THE
TIMES
So far, this has worked to slowly build support among the Republicans and even a Democrat or two at times, and it has slowly formed a group around the President who, while not personally like him, can rely on his strength to develop some of their own. Examples include Senators Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, even Marco Rubio to some extent; Lindsey Graham (who I still do not trust but has spoken forcefully in support of the President many times now), and of course, Attorney General William Barr and others. WTF???Listing Barr as if he's a good guy on the Assange issue? WTF? He is and has long been a deep state crony who COULD PERSONALLY GIVE THE WORD NOW, TONIGHT!, AND DROP ASSANGE'S CHARGES; END THIS TRAVESTY!
From 1971 to 1977, while attending graduate school and law school, Barr worked for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) .[15] He was first hired as a summer intern for two years.[12] During his law school years he was an analyst in the Intelligence Directorate division from 1973 to 1975, and then transitioning to an assistant in the Office of Legislative Counsel and an agency liaison toHe went to George Washington University. Ain't that spy infested?
In 1989, at the beginning of his administration, President George H. W. Bush appointed Barr to the U.S. Department of Justice as Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), an office which functions as the legal advisor for the President and executive agencies. Barr was known as a strong defender of presidential power.[21] He wrote an advisory opinion justifying the U.S. invasion of Panama and arrest of Manuel Noriega.[21] He wrote legal justifications for the practice of rendition,[ 22] so that the FBI could enter onto foreign soil without the consent of the host government to apprehend fugitives wanted by the United States government for terrorism or drug-trafficking.[21] Barr declined a congressional request for the full 1989 opinion, but instead provided a document that "summarizes the principal conclusions". Congress subpoenaed the opinion, and its public release after Barr's departure from the Justice Department showed he had omitted significant findings in the opinion from his summary document.[23][Link]
Comment: