© Global Look Press/Frank May
Jeff and his former spouse Anne Georgulas are trying to resolve a parental dispute over their son, James. Anne insists that James identifies as a girl, calls him Luna, and envisions hormone therapy and eventually sex-change surgery in the future. Jeff rejects the idea and says his son is perfectly comfortable being a boy in his presence. The pair are fighting a legal battle, with a court temporarily ordering Jeff not to impose a male identity on the child.
The order forbids Jeff from calling his son James in front of anyone who knows him as a girl, and this significantly limits what they can do together, he told RT's Sophie Shevardnadze.
"Basically I can't go to a school. I keep him away from any friends he might have at school that know him as a girl, and at my home he's known as James and I use male pronouns. What I'm prohibited from doing right now is trying to convince him that he's actually a boy," he said.
The court's ruling means that Jeff, who is a religious Orthodox Christian, has to be careful when discussing his faith with his son, he said. He is also cautious about teaching James how to behave decently, so that his words cannot be interpreted as imposing a male gender identity.
"I'm even a little trepidatious about reading the Book of Genesis as we go through our Bible readings after Pascha," he said. "So, I've had a lot of trouble communicating with him on religious issues and on basic things that you'd have to teach boys, issues around self-control: how they should deal with women, older women, being respectful to females of their peer group."
It's very difficult for me to figure out how to do this without violating that order.
Jeff said James was misdiagnosed with gender dysphoria and simply wants the approval of both his parents.
"The court asked us to take them to social services and let the boys express their preferences," Jeff said. "And what James said was: he wants to be a girl at his mom's home and a boy at his dad's home. He basically wants both his parents to love him."
Watch the entire interview to learn more about what may become a landmark case in the debate on child gender affirmation in the US.
The child is obviously a victim, and like most children, just wants his parents to be proud of him, and love him. A child wants to make their parents happy. But, which parent is victimizing him, pushing their beliefs upon him? The way that the article reads, at least to me, is that the father is being punished, but no mention about the mother facing any type of conditions to not impress upon her son feminine ideologies, what it means to be a girl, and how to treat boys. It seems that the court has chosen a one way street with which to treat this case, and there's unfairness all throughout.