The coalition included several dictionaries, the SPLC, the majority of colleges and universities in the nation, several Big Tech companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter, and the Democratic Party. Representatives from each of these groups came together at Harvard University to vote on and ratify the proposal officially changing the definition of "hate speech" to "speech we don't like."
"A lot of people are getting the wrong idea about hate speech," a representative from Instagram said. "They believe hate speech actually has to be hateful to qualify. So I think we need to clarify terms here. For instance, we just deleted a post that a lot of progressives did not like. It wasn't hateful or anything, but they did not like it."
The Instagram rep then displayed this slide of the post they had deleted:
"See, we said it was hate speech, but this confused people because it wasn't actually hateful. So I move that we immediately change the definition of hate speech to 'speech you do not like.'"
After the motion passed, dictionaries quickly updated their definitions to read:
Hate speech - (noun) - speech you do not like or speech that offends you in any way // That guy said he disagrees with me. What awful hate speech!At publishing time, the coalition had clarified that this definition does not apply to conservatives.
Reader Comments
So the very term 'anti-semitic' IS another psyop because it replaces anti jewish in usage and associates Jews as semitic while excluding actual semitic descendants such as Palestinians. And smear by association of such accusation with the systematic murder of human beings for reason of race.
Systematic murder is the extension of corrupted power through technological dominance and is 'hidden' by assignment to special hate or selected evils. That are placed 'outside histor'y as a non editable crime against history - but the crime against history is denying historical accountability. This is not to say that there is no truth in anyone's version of history - but nowhere in history is there a narrative that is not biased to support the victor or dominant power of the day.
So the issue is - what it is being used FOR - and exactly what happened is a matter of research and documented or verifiable evidences rather than a circle of cut and paste 'historians'.
Narrative control is a 'psyop' - but before it became the psyence of psyopism it runs as our own private narrative continuity - over the fear of extinction, death, pain of loss and loss of face, power, and self. Such is a mind under terror - whether aware of it or running in an mode of relative insulation.
The roots of any purpose always reveal themselves in the fruits. But the nature of a deceit - which ultimately is a self-deceit - is in making the shoots and fruits SEEM protective or empowering so as not to reveal the lack of true foundation beneath a sense of self specialness associated with private judgements, overriding felt connection of relational being - that as a 'field' aligns and reveals itself in you truly as a matter of course - unless a blocking assertion of private agenda effectively disconnects a mind from its true hearted being under the idea of personal power or the corruption of power to personal vanities - which can also be read as futilities.
The 'deceiver' is thus not IN any agency of its appearance but baiting a reaction in my own mind by which to phish reaction by which I entrap or forsake and am turned against my true good - while believing I act from 'sound intelligence'.
But there is another way of seeing than as a mind in fear and division would be-live inescapably true.
The undoing of deceit of usurping 'intellignece' is the task of the Holy Spirit - which is nothing more than your Right mind - as the healing of wrong-mindedness - to the capacity and willingness to accept whole-mindedness.
The shifting from purpose or 'mind' of fear and division to healing and awakening is not IN the world that fear and division 'make real' to its believers - but needs to be discerned from a point OUTSIDE it framing but WITHIN who you truly are.
' Resist' ye not evil may not be the best translation or may no longer serve so well in terms of modern usage of 'resist'.
But there is a wisdom; what you resist, persists.
And its corollary is what is not used fades from non use.
The attempt to eradicate evil is a mistake that makes and become the hated.
Giving up the mind of judgement of good and evil to a true relational discernment is aligning in the 'Tree of Life' - which cannot be 'forbidden' or you would have no existence at all - but it is 'forbidden' or out of range to the intent or attempt to manipulate - BECAUSE separation from Life is impossible - but note the be-living of life as IN the body is already invested in a personal bias to a relational wholeness.
Opening a fresh foundation within ourself but not IN the 'mind in body in world' is against all our 'training' and associated - guess what - with fear of extinction death, pain of loss and loss of face, power, and self.
“Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". Michael Ellner
But the 'Holy Spirit's' prompt as unified purpose, is to recognise we have been looking at everything through a mind reversal.
Making hate objects out of rigid definitions coercively imposed is the way to maintain a 'private self'.
Or put it the other way around; Self hate is so overwhelming as to be overwhelming, unbearable hell - and so to persist in self-will the toxic energetic or 'evil' has to be projected away from 'self' - which is the making of a world to project guilt onto, as the other side of the self-defence from the feared and hated.
The maintaining of such a 'mind in self-will' is sacrifice of Self - and this then outsources its cause to others and world - and attacks them there in the wish that they be sacrificed that you alone be spared or mitigated. This is the projection of a 'past made in hate and anger' onto an unseen Presence - that is your brother and sister and world as yet un recognised - because a shadow world fears the light and must make a substitute for light in a darkness of hiding.
Coming Out as Human being - cannot be as asserted identity subject to offence - but a shared or extended quality of worth that witnesses to an Innocence and Sanctity of being prior to and beneath the 'machinations of mind' and its use of the body as a separator, weapon and dumping ground.
Without the willingness for a true foundation, the false rules by ruling out. keeping a true choice hidden is the persistence in a 'choose-between' in which all 'choices' serve the same end.
When Job woke up - there was no more mention of Satan. Job didn't 'defeat' Satan - but chose not to accept the suggestions of the mind of a love of form and subsequent hatred for its unworthiness when framed in substitute for God.
How would a mind 'separate' arise but a wish to hold a form or imaged reality against the flow of Creation.
He who binds unto himself a joy, does the winged life destroy,
But he who kisses the joy as it flies,
Live's in Eternity's sunrise. (W Blake)
But it may be pointed out that re-aligning in joy is the release and releasing of the 'mind-destructive', but the attempt to avenge loss or regain what has been denied is the love of a symbol or idol of a joy that is not denied - but for the singular insistence it MUST meet your conditions - which rule out renewal by using change as a weapon and finally - running out of change.
The journey arrives at its starting point - but a false detour can re-run like a stuck record or a persistent programmed response.
There is a quality within now that is inside time. I can discern this question; "Is your desire to go around again?".
All the noise of the world is set to put of the inevitable... outcome of meeting your true Will.
anti-xxxx - a person irrationally hostile to something different (e.g. ant-Semitic)
You are not allowed to associate different sexuality or nationally as being something that one can be hostile to, e.g. one's religion
Any objection has to be framed using the phobia derivative
You are not allowed to associate Jews as being something that one can be threatened by - e.g. if you are Palestinian in Gaza
Any objection has to be framed using the anti derivative
I asked her if he said "that's retarded" or "you're retarded". She was dumbfounded. She couldn't comprehend there was a difference. She was so wound up that using an acceptable word, retarded, is contextual and not necessarily hurtful or hateful, baffled her.
I then went on to chastise her for allowing tattlers, who are ultimately bullies, to cause all of this in the first place.
That lady is retarded.
Seriously?
I can think of a few things of merit that would benefit from “a coalition of groups” coming together, I dunno, homelessness comes to mind, maybe the educational system. Yet We the people are preoccupied and distracted with snowflaky diversions from more serious issues. We’ve become polarized squabbling amongst each other over thin skinned nincompoopery and using the correct gender-bending pronouns, completely oblivious the foreboding inevitability of totalitarianism rapidly approaching.
So which phrase will get me less snowflake stink-eye, I HATE broccoli, or Vegetables I don’t like?
Hellbound Handbasket Safari Tour 2019, buy the ticket, take the ride, purchase the t-shirt .
“The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words. “ — Philip K. Dick