In remarks exposed on Monday by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Sheikh Younus Kathrada remarked that, "[N]owadays, of course, we are close to Christmas."
Kathrada added that "with great sadness, we see that amongst us there are those who think it's a small matter, and so, not only might we congratulate them on their Christmas, on their false holiday and celebration, but we may take part in their holiday as well."
The sheikh's comments came in the wake of a stark warning at the start of this month from the Anglican archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, that Christians in the Middle East were on "the brink of extinction." Writing in the British newspaper The Telegraph on Dec. 1, Welby said that the region's Christians were confronting on a daily basis "the threat of violence, murder, intimidation, prejudice and poverty."
Comment: From whom, exactly? Not secular, multi-confessional states like Syria (and Iraq), where practically everyone celebrates Christmas, regardless of their religion. But ethnic/religious-nationalist states like Saudi Arabia and Israel are different stories... And of course, the loonies and fanatics like al-Nusra, ISIS, and their Wahhabi brethren (supported by the Gulf States, Turkey, the U.S. and Israel at various times over the years) have been the ones trying to destroy Syria, and without whom, Christians would not face any existential threat.
In his sermon delivered in Victoria, BC, Sheikh Kathrada declared: "Do you know that you and I must be offended when people say that they worship Jesus, or when they say that Jesus is the son of God? Why do our hearts not react?"
Said Kathrada: "If a person were to commit every major sin - committing adultery, dealing with interest, lying, murder ... If a person were to do all of those major sins, they are nothing compared to the sin of congratulating and greeting the non-Muslims on their false festivals."
At the same time, Kathrada emphasized that he was not advocating violence against non-Muslims, despite considering them as the "enemy."
"I'm not saying, and I've never said, go out and just kill them, and do this to them: No!" Kathrada said. "Because Allah tells us not to allow the enmity that may exist between you and a people to cause you to be unjust towards them. Rather, be just."
Comment: Small consolation!
According to MEMRI, the South African-born Kathrada is affiliated with the Vancouver-based Al Madinah Islamic Society. The society's website describes itself as a religious educational organization, whose goals are to "familiarize Muslims with reliable and authentic sources of Islamic knowledge, and to link Muslims up with Muslim scholars throughout the world."
Comment: RT adds:
The South Africa-born cleric is no stranger to controversies. He was investigated by the Canadian anti-terror squad following his 2004 remarks that Jews are "brothers of monkeys and swine" during a sermon in Vancouver.
He also criticized Muslims who wanted to build bridges between the two religious communities. Kathrada said his words were taken out context as he was talking about the Palestine-Israel conflict. He then went on to live in Malasya for several years and returned to Canada in 2016.
Reader Comments
But ultimately, my very limited understanding of Islam, whether Sunni, Shia or Sufi (which I believe is an offshoot of one of the first two), I believe that the 'official position of Islam' is that the Entire World is to be converted, and that the first step is taking over the government.
And Shias, who one might suppose are less radicalized that Sunnis (All the headchoppers we've seen of late have been extremist Sunnis), again, Shias still have routinely taken over governments and established laws, etc. E.g.,Iran.
So, input from anyone wise on these points? Am I mistaken? Is there ANY branch of Islam whose ultimate goals is NOT to control, first, their own, government; and then the world?
Islamic oe Islam-aware SOTTites: NOW is the time to speak to those issues and that last question. Yes? or No? No answer likely means I am right on that point.*
R.C.
* I know, that in effect, the West, has exploited peaceful Christianity* - see, e.g., The Vatican, the Cathars, et al., but at least the main text is the New Testament, which is frankly passivist to an extreme.
If followed litterally, the following question would not be merely rhetorical:
"What i f they gave a war, and nobody came?"
** As re Judaism, it seems that their plan for ruling the world - Protocols of Zion - has been a sub rosa gpa;, and yest is a denied but real) goal; which long been adopted by the PTB which I would guess - if it (the PTB) is strictly made of only humans - is mostly Jewish and partly top level Masons &/or Satanists.
My best guess is that if they have a ruling council (which seems obvious they must), the number of members in that group ('that 'rarified' body? my ass! That LOWEST of All, Assembly of Scum-Slime/Death-Worshipping, Sold-Out, (AND Souled-Out!) Demonic Hellions; again, my guess on their top council's number is 13, and the number of 'legislators/tacticians' is 666. (How many attend Bilderberg Conferences? Hmm.
RC