© US Navy / ReutersUSS Philippine Sea launches a Tomahawk cruise missile
"We are in a dialogue, a routine dialogue, with the president to make sure he knows where we are with regard to planning in the event that chemical weapons are used," Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Saturday. "He expects us to have military options and we have provided updates to him on the development of those military options."
Fears of a looming 'chemical incident' in Syria have intensified recently, as the Syrian government closes in on Islamist militants' last major stronghold in Idlib province. Russia, for over a month, has been warning that the terrorists, cornered and desperate, are preparing a false-flag attack to frame Damascus and trigger a US-coalition intervention.
However, the US and its allies continue to insist that there is "zero intelligence that shows the opposition has any chemical capability" or motives to stage a false-flag attack, implying that any future incident would automatically be blamed on Damascus. The US and France - which, along with the UK, jointly struck Syria in 'retaliation' for the previous and yet-to-be-investigated chemical incident last April - have already warned that they are ready to conduct more strikes against Syria.
"The alleged intention of the Syrian government to use poisonous substances in Idlib is presented as a fait accompli," Russian representative at the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, said earlier this week. However, the US and its allies have not concerned themselves with any explanation for the already war-torn state's motives for poisoning Syrian civilians, he added. "The Syrian authorities do not need [the attack], but the terrorists, for whom it's a way to provoke an aggression against Damascus, really do," Nebenzia told the meeting.
While the Pentagon is drawing up plans should chemical weapons come into play, the leaders of Turkey, Russia and Iran met in Tehran to discuss a course of action to remove terrorists from Idlib. In a final statement, the leaders of the so-called Astana peace process agreed to eliminate all terrorist elements from the province, stressing that the solution to the Syrian crisis can only be negotiated through a political settlement.
"We hope that the representatives of terrorist organizations will wisen up, stop putting up resistance and lay down their arms," Vladimir Putin said after the Tehran summit.
Is there ANY people running for PRESIDENT that are openly opposed to war? For trade? For signing off to and end of the Korean war? For removing US soldiers from Afghanistan? Syria? Closing the 1,000 US military bases across the globe on coastal waterfront gained by slicing it off of a former owner like Ethiopia? Is this subject TABOO?
homeland security has been selling green-card Visas to any nation that buys weapons and looks the other way when we bullet our way into setting up US friendly governments. I'm for the BALANCE OF POWER President J Carter advocates. Coercion doesn't work whether you are the cops/social workers alliance bullying a community member out of their home because they don't have the power connections to keep it or a nation of guns and psychlogical media machines dominating the world traders. IT seems that the way to make sure the next generation doesn't take action to reverse the western power manipulations is that they are left mentally deficient from the results of epigenetic changes resulting from constant stress living amid ruins.
Should I point out that the hallmark of our supposed religious country is that WE LOVE CHILDREN?