Earth Changes

US EPA Chief says CO2 is NOT the primary driver of climate change

Adapt 2030
You Tube
Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:00 UTC

US EPA chief comes out and says that CO2 is not the primary driver of the climate and that it is impossible to correctly measure the entire surface of the globe to get a true assessment of changes in Earth's climate system. Australia is closing the Hazelwood power plant that is a back up for South Australia if power from wind is not available, now what, no back up for that.

Snow on tap for the SE USA in the coming week and new food growing techniques with SquareRoots LED Vertical farms.

Sources

Comment: See also: EPA Chief Pruitt: Carbon dioxide isn't "primary contributor" to global warming

Reader Comments

QuantumLogic · 2017-03-12T05:07:14Z

I read the commented article as well. Being in the automotive industry for 20 years, I can say that the CAFE standards have done nothing but drive up vehicle costs- not lower emissions. They allow manufacturers to separate cars from trucks to bypass CAFE mpg rules, but they all attribute higher costs to each vehicle they make- whether production changes were made per vehicle or not. Typical US automaker scam...

As hard as it will be, I really want to see the collapse via meteor/comet/celestial action. It is the only way, at this point, imo.

lysna · 2017-03-12T11:17:00Z

QuantumLogic Stop wishing upon a star...lol...And if we got struck do you seriously think the survivors wouldn't quickly come back to the same state the big rock of fire and water found us in...Human nature is a worry... a big major el supremo worry.

Divide By Zero · 2017-03-13T04:02:15Z

lysna yep and a disaster would leave all of the nuke plants to melt down, making a nice irradiated planet, yeehawwww!

Rope for Sale · 2017-03-12T22:45:27Z

Methane causes 30 times more damage than CO2 so he is correct. No backup for wind and solar? What about GEO thermal energy? You drill a hole anywhere on the planet and lower loops of pipe into it. Pass water through it and use steam to drive a turbine. Same theory as oil/coal fired and nuclear power stations with out the environmental damage. We drill deep enough to get to oil and gas so why not harness the heat down there instead of the oil?

Divide By Zero · 2017-03-13T04:00:59Z

Rope for Sale It's been done but it can't replace the huge amount of base load energy that we use electric alone... Even the company i worked for that had geo thermal needed boilers sometimes to keep the stream pressure high enough to prevent issues with the turbines.