Andrea Thompson, Climate Central
The Raw StoryTue, 12 Aug 2014 14:17 UTC
© mashable.comFreeway sign in Los Angeles. No end in sight for California drought.
The heat records keep falling for California. The state has had its hottest first seven months of the year, crushing the previous mark. Neighboring states have also baked, though not quite at record levels, helping contribute to both the spread of drought and large wildfires. At the same time, cool weather had a number of Midwest states experiencing July temperatures that were closer to September norms. On Tuesday, the
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) released its monthly climate update for the U.S. and it contained more cruel news for California. Precipitation was near average throughout the state, but it had a negligible impact on the state's
record-setting drought because summer is its dry season. To reinforce that, NCDC noted that
while San Francisco received 800 percent of its usual July rainfall, that equalled only 0.08 inches.
© NCDC
Heat continued to bake the state, fueling a drought that's projected to
cost $2 billion by year's end. California had its fifth-warmest July on record, including pockets of record warmth along the northern coast.
July's heat kept the state on track for its warmest year in 120 years of recordkeeping. Since January, the state's average temperature has been 4.6°F above the 20th-century average. That smashes the previous record by 1.4°F.
Five other western states had their top 10 warmest Julys as well, which helped to fuel large wildfires. In Washington, which had its fifth-warmest July, the
Carlton Complex Fire burned more than 250,000 acres. In Oregon, which had its second-warmest July, the
Buzzard Complex Fire charred more than 400,000 acres. Despite those two large fires, the amount of acres burned by wildfires nationwide is at a 10-year low.
While heat was the story in the West, persistent cool weather continues to be the story for the eastern half of the country.
The Midwest and Southeast were in the bullseye for a mid-summer's chill with 12 states stretching from Louisiana to Michigan recording one of their 10-coldest Julys. That includes a record cool July for Indiana and Arkansas.
© www.flickr.comA midsummer night's freeze.
When the temperature extremes on both side of the Mississippi River were averaged, the U.S. as a whole had a near-average July with temperatures just 0.3°F below average.
By now, many are familiar with the hot West-cool East divide that's been a recurring feature for the U.S. since winter. North Pacific Ocean temperatures could be to blame for keeping hot air trapped in the West and driving cold air down from Canada across the eastern half of the country.
"The pattern of a warm West and cool East has been a persistent for most of 2014. Very warm sea surface temperatures in the northeast Pacific, off the coast of Alaska, is associated with the pattern of a ridge in the West and a trough in the East," Jake Crouch, a scientist at NCDC, told Climate Central in late July.
Some research has also suggested that while natural shifts have driven this pattern, climate change could play a role in the future. In the nearer term, El Niño could shake up the pattern in different ways.Last week, the
Climate Prediction Center forecast El Niño was still likely to form this fall, though they lowered the odds of their forecast to 65 percent. If El Niño forms, temperatures in the western U.S. are likely to get another (and perhaps unwelcome) boost. The northern half of the country could also see temperatures trend up a bit. And perhaps most importantly, parts of the West, including California, could see an uptick in precipitation, which could finally start to beat back the state's crushing drought.
This article was originally published at
Climate Central.
Comment: Climate Central claims it is "a leading authority on climate science that cuts through the hype with a clear-eyed analysis of climate change, delivering just the facts and findings." Its world weather attribution project looks at the role of global warming in extreme weather events and identifies a human fingerprint. This initiative performs extreme "weather autopsies" immediately after an extreme weather event and makes a snap determination for the waiting media. They state four possible outcomes of the attribution analysis: #1) global warming increased the likelihood of the event, #2) global warming did not play a role in the event, #3) global warming reduced the likelihood of the event, and #4) the model was unable to reproduce the event. In example, Climate Central has deemed "manmade climate change significantly increased the odds of the killer European heat wave of 2003 and the Russian heat wave of 2010. Their bottom line is "YES, these events fit a pattern that climate scientists have long expected to appear as the result of increased greenhouse gasses in our atmosphere." A general scientific agreement is that global warming has contributed a trend toward more intense extremes of heat and precipitation around the world, is partly to blame for specific extreme weather events and will continue to influence both in the future."
Sounds like this ultra-scientific, fact-finding, data-digging, leading authority is feeding a pre-determined agenda with pre-determined results. It is doubtful outcomes #2,#3,#4 are ever factors. Those options do not make headlines. Greenhouse gas does.
Comment: Climate Central claims it is "a leading authority on climate science that cuts through the hype with a clear-eyed analysis of climate change, delivering just the facts and findings." Its world weather attribution project looks at the role of global warming in extreme weather events and identifies a human fingerprint. This initiative performs extreme "weather autopsies" immediately after an extreme weather event and makes a snap determination for the waiting media. They state four possible outcomes of the attribution analysis: #1) global warming increased the likelihood of the event, #2) global warming did not play a role in the event, #3) global warming reduced the likelihood of the event, and #4) the model was unable to reproduce the event. In example, Climate Central has deemed "manmade climate change significantly increased the odds of the killer European heat wave of 2003 and the Russian heat wave of 2010. Their bottom line is "YES, these events fit a pattern that climate scientists have long expected to appear as the result of increased greenhouse gasses in our atmosphere." A general scientific agreement is that global warming has contributed a trend toward more intense extremes of heat and precipitation around the world, is partly to blame for specific extreme weather events and will continue to influence both in the future."
Sounds like this ultra-scientific, fact-finding, data-digging, leading authority is feeding a pre-determined agenda with pre-determined results. It is doubtful outcomes #2,#3,#4 are ever factors. Those options do not make headlines. Greenhouse gas does.