Puppet Masters
Prosecutors allege BNP conducted "long-term, multi-jurisdictional conspiracy." A lawyer representing the bank appeared in New York state court on Monday to answer for both charges, reports Reuters.
The settlement represents the largest criminal penalty in US history, and will practically wipe out BNP's entire 2013 pre-tax income of $11.2 billion, reports the BBC.
The size of the looming fine had been decried by the French government. The country's foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, previously said the amount would be "an extremely serious problem," an "unfair and unilateral decision" and "not reasonable."
"BNP went to elaborate lengths to conceal prohibited transactions, cover its tracks, and deceive US authorities. These actions represent a serious breach of US law," US attorney general Eric Holder said in a statement.
The French financial watchdog ACPR released a statement on Monday regarding the agreement with US prosecutors.
"ACPR, as the home supervisor of BNP Paribas, has examined the situation of BNP Paribas and has concluded that BNP Paribas Group has a solid solvency and liquidity position, which will allow it to absorb the anticipated consequences of these sanctions."
The bank had announced in April that it had set aside $1.1 billion to cover the cost of the expected US fine, but warned that the final outcome "could be far in excess of the amount of the provision," suggesting that it was not caught off guard by the settlement.
BNP's settlement now surpasses oil giant BP's 2012 $4 billion agreement with the US Department of Justice to resolve criminal charges related to the massive 2010 Deepwater Horizon well blowout and resulting oil spill.
New York state regulators said that the settlement would result in the termination of some of the bank's senior executives, as well as restrict US dollar clearing operations. Some 30 employees will leave the bank as a result of the probe, including several who have left already.
The agreement will also lay out a specific compliance program to keep the bank's operations in line with the American sanctions regime.
The latest settlement highlights a string of aggressive and high profile actions by the US against foreign banks. However, BNP's fine dwarfs the $1.9 billion penalty imposed on HSBC in 2012 under similar charges, as well as the $2.6 billion May fine on Credit Suisse stemming from the bank's involvement in tax evasion claims.
The severity of BNP's fine is related to the bank's lack of cooperation, and allegations that it continued to process transactions that violated US law even after the probe was initiated.
Comment: The US prefers to go after foreign banks and slap fines on them at will, whereas the giant US banks in the US are protected and even helped to the tune of trillions with taxpayer funded bail-outs. Why do European banks accept the rulings of US courts as they have no international basis?
Putin sees it well as just another strongarm tactic by the US to try and blackmail the French Government into cancelling the Mistral ship contract with Russia:
'Every state has right to be different': Top 10 takeaways from Russia's president Putin's foreign policy speech
President Putin criticized Washington, which already imposed sanctions on Moscow after the accession of the Republic of Crimea into Russia, for making efforts to scuttle Russia's 1.12 billion euro deal on Mistral warships with France.
"We know about the pressure that our American partners put on France to prevent the supply of Mistral [warships] to Russia. And we know that they hinted that if the French won't supply Mistral [warships] then sanctions against their banks will be removed or, at least, minimized. What is this, if not blackmail?"
Reader Comments
1) The US is the boss and the boss is always right
2) If in doubt refer to rule number one!
The article mentions "long-term, multi-jurisdictional conspiracy", which doesn't really make any sense to me (and ironically, when you and I see any kind of conspiracy somewhere, we're crazy). If I remember correctly, France openly said they would go ahead with the deal. If you make a public statement about something before you do it, it can hardly be considered a conspiracy. But that seems irrelevant to me. The relevant part is that France is apparently being punished for breaking US law, which I would like some international lawyers to explain to me.
And by the same logic, can we make the US pay for breaking Russian laws?
for BNP to hire assassins to take care of those responsible for this outrage?






Somebody explain this to me because I'm confused...
1. By what mechanism has the US the right to tell other countries what to do and make them pay fines if they don't comply?
2. "serious breach of US law" - Since when are European countries bound by US law?
3. Who exactly gets this $8.8bln?