Society's Child
Amanda Clayton, a 24-year-old from Lincoln Park, Mich., is one of the few who does, and she is getting away with it. Clayton won $1 million from the Michigan State Lottery this fall, but she is still collecting and using $200 a month in food assistance from the taxpayers with her Michigan Bridge Card.
"I thought that they would cut me off, but since they didn't, I thought maybe it was okay because I'm not working," the lottery winner who just purchased a new house and car told Local 4 in Detroit. The station even filmed her shamelessly purchasing goods.
When Local 4 asked if she felt she had a right to the money, Clayton responded, "I mean I kinda do."
Clayton justified the sentiment by explaining that after taking her winnings in a lump sum and having to pay taxes, the total amount was just over half of the initial winnings.
"I feel that it's okay because I mean, I have no income and I have bills to pay," she said. "I have two houses."
Watch Local 4 confront Clayton:
A bill to prevent this type of behavior, sponsored by state Republican Rep. Dale Zorn has passed the state House, as has a companion bill in the state Senate.
"Public assistance should be given to those who are in need of public assistance, not those who have found riches," said Zorn, who has sponsored a bill requiring the state to cross-check the names of lottery winners of prizes over $1,000 with names of individuals on the dole.
Until Clayton is cut off, however, she says she intends to continue to use her benefits.
Reader Comments
Yep, even stupid people win the lottery. Apparently they have as much a chance to do so - if not more - than any other person.
She isn't stupid; just ignorant.
And isn't that what we've been going for all these years?
What relevance do spiritual values like ethics and fair exchange have in a society where material wealth is considered to be the apex of personal achievement? Did you take any classes in "ethics" when you went to school?
It was a foreign subject to me until Hubbard introduced me to it. I had not the slightest clue.
As further illustration, I heard a story on NPR today about a teenager in Florida who bought a house with her mom. She's a shrewd entrepreneur. But, what does she seem to value the most? Owning things.
Is that really the moral fiber we need to survive into the coming decades?
I, for one, am glad I found out about ethics.
This is such a painful story. This woman probably wishes she had never won. She became overwhelmed by this amount of money and reacted too quickly. Two homes that have probably lowered in value by 40% since she bought them. The state should have cut her off but she probably had not filed her taxes. However, as a republic, we have every right to question her poor judgement. She knew what she was doing. She needs to pay back what she consciously stole.