OF THE
TIMES
A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.
I wonde what all this attacked sites have in common. Might it be "Micro$oft Windows" ?!? :O
Seems to me this Alien reveal nonsense just puts Tucker squarely in the same role as Agent Musk. Tucker's interview and affect with Rogan strikes...
The depopulation agenda is clear. The globalists/Kabal will slowly starve out the majority of the population. Presently, most of our food comes...
It is a fact of physical existence that everything eats everything, any part of life needs all the other parts of life in order to flourish......
How do they know it is an attack, rather than a system failure?
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Where did anyone get the idea that war liberates? America now reeks of this absurdity. Did you know that the motto of the US Army Special Forces is "To Liberate the Oppressed?" This is a myth established in our culture during the Kennedy years.
When has force of arms ever liberated?
War incarcerates. Inevitably.
When anyone talks about how they are going to "fight for democracy" you know right there that something is suspicious. 1776 to the contrary, that's not how you get democracy. Democracy is one of a few different systems designed to settle political disputes without violence. To enforce it with violence violates its own basic principles.
As far as I can tell, democracy has never been well-established on earth. There is simply insufficient agreement here that it is possible to survive without resorting to force of arms.
There is rather good evidence now to support the belief that democracy was invented as a way to give the public the idea that they are participating in the operation of their governments, when in fact this in only marginally true. Most families don't even operate democratically! So why should we expect towns, cities and states to do so? It's a show, and the sooner we recognize it as such the better.
What we do have is a concept of human rights. In the US this is even carried so far as to say that if the government has the right to an army, then the citizens have the right to one, too.
Politics runs on balances of force and probably always will. As long as beings exist who acquire weapons for the purpose of terrifying others (like a mugger who threatens you then steals your purse) a "sane" force must exist to counter their inclination to do wrong. The great challenge of politics, when it acts for the survival of a society or social order, is to keep that countervailing force relatively sane and honest.
Any criminal operation in any society will seek out those points that tend to act to keep governmental force sane and try to corrupt them so that their ability to perform this function is destroyed. Where they succeed you have tyranny, regardless of what other names you call it or how you dress it up with mighty-sounding principles.
This earth teeters perilously on the brink of such an existence. Who will act to save it?