Man gets confused when things that happen around him and to him, or which are done in his name, cannot be properly grasped, understood or made sense of. Normally, such confusion leads to inaction. If you're lost at night in the middle of a forest but you can still see the stars, then a bit of astronomical knowledge will at least quickly tell you which way is north. But if it's cloudy or you're ignorant of the constellations in starry heaven, then you might as well light up a fire and do nothing until dawn.... You're Lost!
Today, mainstream media coverage uses programmed distortion, confusion, even outright lying when its Money Power masters order it to support the "official story" on any major political, economic or financial process. When looked at closely, however, the "official story" of things can be seen to be inaccurate, misleading, often hardly believable if not downright stupid.
Examples of this: Iraq's inexistent WMD's leading to the invasion and destruction of that country; global mega-banker bail-outs with taxpayer money; irrational US diplomatic, military, financial and ideological alignment to Israeli objectives; "we-killed-Osama-Bin-Laden-and-dumped-his-body-into-the-sea"; and the wide array of "whodunits" surrounding 9/11 in New York and Washington, 7/7 in London, the AMIA/Israeli Embassy attacks in Buenos Aires in 1992/1994, and - of course - that all time favorite: who shot JFK...?
These are but a few of the paradigmatic cases that have at least served to trigger millions of people to wake up and think with their own minds instead of the mainstream media's! But unfortunately the vast majority of such cases are not so clear-cut. The vast majority of Newspeak lies are like knots, difficult to untie as they carry built-in complexity resembling Gordian Knots. And, as with all Gordian Knots, you need to cut right through them, and this requires swift and precise action plus a good measure of intellectual courage.
To give an example of what we say, let's take a quick look at how a "Newspeak" operation works. It requires sequential planning, it requires time, it requires proper logistics, it requires "credible" spokespeople in public and private sectors, it requires choosing the right words and images at the right time and in the right circumstances.
So, let's say the Global Power Elite - working through the governments of the US, UK, EU into which they are deeply embedded, and joint-venturing with a wide array of media outlets, defense companies, oil companies, security and construction companies, and powerful lobbies - decide that they wish to overrun and destroy a specific country... Libya, for example...
How do they ensure that "the international community" will just quietly look on (except for the still relatively small minority of voices that are increasingly raising hell against them)?
The Seven Step Mainstream Media Country Destruction Guide
- First, they start by targeting a country ripe for "Regime Change", and brand it a "rogue state"; then...
- They arm, train, finance local terrorist groups through CIA, MI6, Mossad, Al-Qaeda (a CIA operation), drug cartels (often CIA operations) and call them "freedom fighters"; then...
- As mock UN Security Council Resolutions are staged that rain death and destruction upon millions of civilians, they call it "UN sanctions to protect civilians"; then...
- They spread flagrant lies through their "newsrooms" and paid journalists, and call it "the international community's concerns expressed by prestigious spokespeople and analysts..." then...
- They bomb, invade and begin to control the target country and call it "liberation"; then...
- As the target country falls fully under their control, they impose "the kind of democracy that we want to see" (as Hillary Clinton before visiting Egypt and Tunisia on March 10, 2011), until finally...
- They steal appetizing oil, mineral and agricultural reserves handing them over to Global Power Elite corporations, and impose unnecessary private banking debt and call it "foreign investment and reconstruction."
Their Elders recommended this many decades ago in a blueprint for World Domination written on a hoary manuscript of old...
"What did you say...? That you don't want to be 'liberated' and 'democratized'?!?"
"Then, take this Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Hanoi, Berlin, Dresden, Baghdad, and Basra!! Take that Tokyo, Gaza, Lebanon, Kabul, Pakistan, Tripoli, Belgrade, Egypt, El Salvador and Grenada!! And take that, Panama, Argentina, Chile, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Somalia, Africa!!"
Always bombing people to smithereens... Always, of course, in the name of "freedom", "democracy", "peace" and "human rights"
Reader Comments
The first point made should be to always get your news from their 'enemy' in this puppet show, as the best way to defeat or at least weaken an opponent is to simply tell their truth... though be careful not to tell your own, and if you can prevent it, don't let them tell your people your truth.
Russia Times has a good rep in covering the West, just not much when the spotlight turns to the East. Just another point to remember. They, like all others, can only take you so far. Don't expect them to outrun their line of supply. No one can afford to do that.
"Their Elders recommended this many decades ago in a blueprint for World Domination written on a hoary manuscript of old... "
Now what manuscript could this possibly be referring to? Hmmmm, let me guess...
Is the slogan I hear all the time, and see on parade floats in my "conservative" town, "Freedom is not free" - which means we need to allow the government to kill innocent civilians, and our young men, forced to volunteer in the military because of poverty and joblessness, in unjust wars designed to maintain hegemony (mainly oil and artificial value of our $) and NOT complain about this or even discuss it) so that we can preserve the false sense of freedom that still remains in our country. Wonder who the rhetorician is who dreamed up that one?