OF THE
TIMES
We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
Ah, the old game of who's dick is bigger. Poth parties came out of the pool, looked down and said, let's do this later.
We all know who controls who.
How is this different from welfare assistance?
The unilateral veto power is why the UN is a joke.
Im a big fan of evidence, so I asked Statistics Canada for the 2023 Deaths by Cause. Everything appears normal up to 2019, then... Here is the...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
I can't help but wonder if this is another sign of the CIA running amok and fanning the flames for civil war in Pakistan, similar to the destabilisation ground work that had been carried out in Libya before the invasion of Libyan airspace. If this was the Taliban at work, which I very much doubt, then there are three points of consideration that make no logical sense in this move.
1 - The Taliban already know that their ideological ally Bin Laden was already laid to rest years ago, so they would know that there is no need for retaliation over this faked assassination scenario.
2 - The Taliban would also know that the US has been seeking to destabilise Pakistan since the start of the drone strikes on Pakistani territory, so why help the US further their military conquest of Pakistan, by helping foment civil war?
3 - Even if the Taliban had forgotten all about Bin Ladens previous death, bought into these lies (or been paid off) and sought any form of revenge, would it not make more sense to target those responsible in either Afghanistan or Pakistan, namely the US military or US interests...as there are plenty of US bases and the consulate in Pakistan which could have been targeted if they were truly seeking revenge against the perpetrators of the act.
This just seems like more smoke and mirrors brought to us by the secret team in an effort to form a plausible excuse - in the eyes of the brianwashed masses - for military interventionism in Pakistan, under the guise of doing it to secure those Pakistani nuclear assets from an increasingly failed state. I think we will unfortunately see more of these random and acts of violence as the CIA assets working across Pakistan seek to murder and maim as many as possible to create division and push the war/interventionist agenda forward, with the hope that they can stir up another civil war.