Puppet MastersS

War Whore

The perpetual warmonger Tom Cotton

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.).
© Michael Vadon / Wikimedia CommonsSen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.)
The Wall Street Journal interview with Sen. Tom Cotton was a useful reminder that he is every bit as fanatical on foreign policy as he seems to be:
When it comes to America's present challenges-from Iran to North Korea, China to Russia, Syria to Ukraine-Mr. Cotton, a conservative Republican, is squarely on Team [Teddy] Roosevelt. "There is always a military option," he says. "That is the case everywhere in the world."
There might technically be a "military option" in every case, but only madmen would always prefer that option over the alternatives. One of the many problems with Cotton's worldview is that he favors military action when none is needed and other responses would either be more effective or less costly or both. The only military intervention he can bring himself to criticize is the Libyan war, and then only because it gives him a chance to score points on Obama for not intervening more aggressively in Syria:

Comment: For more information on the neocon stooge read:

Bad moon rising: The neocons are back


Quenelle - Golden

It's not just Jerusalem, it's all of Palestine

Jerusalem
What's going on in Jerusalem is what has always been going on in Palestine since 1948 -the forced dispossession of Palestinian Arabs of their identity, land and heritage.

Because of Donald Trump's declaration to move the US embassy to Jerusalem and the resultant global outrage regarding this decision, many people have become interested in understanding what is going on in Palestine and what the global ramifications might be.

They are finally becoming aware, after 69 years of Nakba, 69 anniversaries of Human Rights Day and 69 years of falsification of history, that the Palestinian people, like all other peoples in the world, do in fact have the right to self-determination and return.

Comment: Arab leaders - including those who have previously signed agreements with Israel - are also planning responses:
In Jordan, the lower house of parliament has decided unanimously to carry out a comprehensive review of the various agreements signed with Israel. Khalil Attiyeh, the deputy speaker of the Jordanian parliament, initiated the bill to review Jordan's agreements with Israel. He told Al-Monitor that the parliament had to act big. "When the issue is as big as Jerusalem, the reaction has to be at the same level."

The Jordanian parliamentary bill introduced by Attiyeh calls on the judiciary committee to review all agreements signed with Israel and "to list all violations to the agreements, providing suggestions about them in light of Israeli violations of international agreements."
...
Leading Arab commentator Oraib al-Rantawi, writing in Jordan's Ad-Dustourpaper, said that in light of the popular anger in the entire region, Arab governments have only one choice: "To ride the wave and to be as quiet about actions as possible until the ominous month of December is over."

Rantawi hinted in the same article that after the wave passes, Arab leaders will return to the need for "realism" and will come back to the US mediator. Being "quiet" means that no major decisions should be made.

Meanwhile, in Egypt, widespread protests have made it impossible for Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's administration not to take a strong stand. On Dec. 9, Cairo hosted an emergency meeting of the Arab League, which all foreign ministers of Arab countries, including the feuding Gulf countries, attended.

The Arab League adopted a 16-point resolution rejecting the US decision and calling on all countries to recognize Palestine based on the June 4, 1967, borders. Iraqi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari argued that the decision didn't go far enough, and called for even tougher diplomatic measures to be taken, a possible hint to the countries who have peace agreements with Israel.
The OIC's full statement can be read here. Erdogan is this year's chairman for the OIC. During his speech, he went on the offensive, showing maps of regions illegally occupied by Israel, calling Israel a child-murderer and terrorist state, criticizing Israel's rogue nuclear weapons program... Iran's President Rouhani even extended an olive branch of sorts to Saudi Arabia, saying Iran "is willing to cooperate with ALL MUSLIM COUNTRIES over defending Al-Quds without any precondition." Now it just remains to be seen how united the OIC nations can remain.

As Andrew Korybko points out, this is the perfect move for Russia to step in as a facilitator:
By doing what he did, Trump compelled the OIC to respond by reaffirming many of its members' existing positions in recognizing East Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Palestine, which implies the existence of a West Jerusalem that could potentially be the capital of Israel following its formal recognition by the Ummah after a peace settlement is eventually reached. This holds remarkable implications because it creates the conditions for moving the peace process forward, as all of the OIC's member states just agreed to acknowledge the pre-1967 division of Jerusalem prior to Israel's full and illegal occupation of its entirety.

...Even in the unlikely possibility that this was part of a "master plan" by the US to restart the peace process, which it doesn't seem to have genuinely been in any case, it's certainly not unfolding as Washington may have wanted.

The OIC also declared in its joint statement that the US is no longer welcome to participate in negotiations over the two-state solution unless Trump reverses his decision, which isn't likely given his personal predisposition and disinclination to publicly appear as though he's backing down over anything, let alone a demand issued by a group of Muslim countries. That, however, opens up an historic window of opportunity for Russia to step in and take the role in leading this process instead, seeing as how it enjoys excellent relations with both Israel and the Ummah.

It also shouldn't be forgotten that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared in April of this year that it will recognize West Jerusalem as Israel's capital so long as East Jerusalem is made the capital of a future Palestinian state. Seeing as how the OIC implicitly agreed to this through its joint statement without directly saying as much, the door is now open for Russia to replace the lost American role in leading the two-state solution by "balancing" between both competing parties and helping to breathe new life into this stalled process.
Trump injecting a little bit of that "Art of the Deal" chaos seems to have opened up a bunch of possibilities:


Tornado2

Tactics the US might employ in destabilizing Russia to influence its elections

Putin America eagle
Russian March 2018 Presidential Elections are approaching. Putin has recently announced that he will run as a candidate. The global players who don't want Putin to stay in power will likely do everything possible to get rid of him. Let's explore some possible pressure points and try to predict the most unpleasant developments.

The measures to destabilize Russia amid the elections are most likely to be complex and could potentially include:

1. Exacerbating situation in Eastern Ukraine/Donetsk People's Republic and Lugansk People's Republic. A coordinated, big scale assault on break-away regions by the Kiev government and ultra-nationalist battalions, if successful, could be exploited informationally by evoking a public discourse inside Russia about Putin betraying the people of Donbass/Novorossia, or being incapable of helping them, which could potentially decrease his approval ratings domestically. There are reports of soldiers from the US National Guard, namely the New York's 27th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT), being moved to Ukraine in late October 2017, so we might expect some dangerous provocations early next year. Also, as post-2014 history shows, any increase in military clashes between the Kiev government and Donbass rebels could as well be used internationally to demonise Russia and Putin personally (by blaming it on him directly), which could conveniently serve as a justification for tougher economic sanctions, thus enabling more intense economic warfare against the Russian Federation.


Comment: Considering the pressure on Trump to sell the Ukraine more weapons, as well as the recent developments with Poroshenko, it appears that some chess pieces are being put in place so that they can exploit that scenario. See also:

A Dynamic Analysis of Ukraine Politics: The Crooks, the Clowns and the Nazis


2. Direct US/NATO attack against the Syrian government. Similar to what happened on April 07, 2017, the United States government could use casus belli (manufactured by, say, the White Helmets) to launch a series of missile/airstrikes on the Syrian Arab Army forces, leaving Russia with very little choice but to leave its Syrian ally behind and surrender its geostrategic interests in the region in order to evade direct military confrontation with the United States government (the confrontation that could potentially escalate to a nuclear war). That would not only plummet Putin's domestic approval ratings, but would also harm his reputation in the Muslim world and in Arabic speaking countries, compromising Russia's foreign policy in the Middle East, Central Asia, Pakistan, as well as potentially spawning an anti-Putin sentiment in the Caucasus region. Such strategy would certainly be dangerous to play, because it, indeed, can lead the world to a Nuclear Apocalypse; yet, given the observed desperation and lack of wisdom among certain circles in the modern US elite, we can't rule this scenario out completely.


Comment: Could be part of the reason why the US intends to remain in Syria.


Comment: In light of all these scenarios, the main thing the Western elite need to do is control the flow of information and public perception. And they've taken the first step by heavily investing in their anti-Russian troll armies.


Gift 3

Did Saudi Arabia just try to give the West Bank to Israel, leaving only Gaza for the Palestinians?

Mohamed bin Salman Jared Kushner Ivanka Trump
© Official White House Photo by Shealah CraigheadSenior White House Adviser Jared Kushner, and his wife, Assistant to the President Ivanka Trump,at the Murabba Palace with Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, May 20, 2017, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.


The crown prince could be working to engineer a two-state solution that favors Israel.


The Trump declaration recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital and relocating the U.S. embassy there is as historically significant to Israel's control of Jerusalem as the Balfour Declaration was to recognizing the rights of the Jewish people in Palestine.

But according to new revelations, the announcement could be part of a grander plan to help Israel wrest control of Jerusalem, as well as the West Bank, from the Palestinians for good, leaving the Arabs with their own state of Gaza only.

Anyone looking to the State Department for guidance about any of this is bound to be disappointed. Foggy Bottom's first public defense of the president's blockbuster announcement would have been laughable if it weren't so depressing. Indeed, Thursday's State Department briefing, starring good soldier David Satterfield, could have been pilfered from the popular British comedy "Yes, Prime Minister."

Comment: It looks like the concerns of Palestinian officials were justified:
Palestinian officials have expressed worry that Saudi Arabia is forgoing important Palestinian rights as it acts behind the scenes to advance a United States "grand bargain" over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that heavily favors Israeli interests.

Four Palestinian officials told Reuters on condition of anonymity on Friday that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman had communicated a proposal to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that would give away the right of return for Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem al-Quds as the capital of a future Palestinian state in return for conditions unfavorable to Palestinians, Reuters reported on Friday.

That proposal has reportedly been shaped by Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump's son-in-law and "senior adviser," who has developed a close relationship with Mohammed bin Salman.

The Palestinian officials expressed concern that the proposal is too much in line with Israeli interests and to the disadvantage of Palestinians, whose land Israel has occupied.



War Whore

Tillerson's remarks on Crimea typical of US war whores

Rex Tillerson


The USA has no legitimate interest in who controls Crimea, Jerusalem, the South China Sea, and many other regions


"We will never accept Russia's occupation and attempted annexation of Crimea," declaimed Rex Tillerson last week in Vienna. "Crimea-related sanctions will remain in place until Russia returns full control of the peninsula to Ukraine."

Tillerson's principled rejection of the seizure of land by military force - "never accept" - came just one day after President Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital and pledged to move our embassy there.

How did Israel gain title to East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Golan Heights? Invasion, occupation, colonization, annexation.

Comment: This article seems naive. It's become glaringly apparent that endless wars are the primary interest of the US, the pretext for which is rather inconsequential (as long as a good excuse can be whipped up and fed to the plebes via a complicit media).

See:


Eye 1

Pentagon refuse to accept their failure in Syria, Russia leaves victorious and with a warning

Russian fighter jet
© Ministry of defence of the Russian Federation / Sputnik
Russian President Vladimir Putin paid a visit to Russia's Hmeymim airbase in Syria, where he ordered to pullout Russian troops from Syria. Speaking to the military, Putin stressed that the Russian armed forces, together with the Syrian army, have defeated a massive group of international terrorists in Syria.

"In this connection, I made a decision: a significant part of the Russian military contingent in the Syrian Arab Republic will return home, to Russia," the Supreme Commander-in-Chief said. "You are returning to your homes, to your relatives, parents, wives, children, friends as victors. Your Motherland is waiting for you, friends. Good luck, I thank you for your service," Putin said.


The President added that in case of attempts to break peace in Syria, terrorists will face the strikes, "which they have not seen before."


Comment: Also See:


USA

Bad moon rising: The neocons are back

Senator Tom Cotton neocon Israel lobby
Senator Tom Cotton, completely owned by the Israel lobby.


A new cabinet will mark neocon ascendancy


Back during the admittedly brief shock and awe period that immediately followed on the Trump electoral victory, it appeared that there might be an actual realignment of American foreign policy. The neoconservatives virtually unanimously had opposed Donald Trump in the most vile terms, both in the GOP primaries and during the actual electoral campaign, making clear that Hillary was their choice for a future full of unrelenting, ideologically driven warfare to convert the world to democracy. By that metric, one would assume that Trump would prefer to be roasted on a spit rather than have neocons on his national security team, and many in the punditry did agree with that analysis and went on to share that view.

At the time, I agreed, but I did note that the neoconservatives have proven to be remarkable resilient, particularly as many of them have remained true to their Democratic Party values on nearly everything but foreign policy, where they are irredeemable hawks, hostile to Russia and Iran and always reliably in the corner of Israel. In short, many neocons can be unmasked as Hillary Clinton Democrats if one looks at them issue by issue, which certainly helps to explain some subsequent developments.

Comment: There is one name missing from the article that should always be mentioned when discussing the influence of the Israel lobby on the Trump administration: Jared Kushner.


Eiffel Tower

Artful Deception: France's Macron tries to clean up Saudi Arabia's image

Macron and Friends
A week after French President Emmanuel Macron opened the Louvre museum in Abu Dhabi, a painting attributed to Leonardo Da Vinci went on sale for a record $450 million at an auction in New York City.

It was then reported that the buyer turned out to be none other than Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia with whom Macron is said to enjoy a close, personal rapport.

The 500-year-old renaissance portrait of Jesus Christ - entitled 'Salvator Mundi' ('Savior of the World') - will henceforth go on display in Abu Dhabi's franchise of the Louvre, presumably on long-term loan from the Saudi monarchy.

Comment: The idea that an art sale can somehow un-tarnish the image of headchopping Saudi Arabia seems laughable. But sadly, people have short attention spans and Macron, acting as PR for this truly barbaric nation, only in the interest of selling them weapons, may just be able to pull it off. Like putting lipstick on a pig (actually, that's an insult to pigs!).

See also:


Hiliter

Pentagon stops short on declaring victory over ISIS in Iraq

Airstrikes Islamic State Mosul, Iraq
© AP Photo/Felipe Dana, FileAirstrikes target Islamic State positions on the edge of the Old City in Mosul, Iraq. Iraq said Saturday that its war on the ISIS is over.
While congratulating Iraqi forces for making "considerable progress" against "a determined enemy," the Pentagon on Monday stopped short of endorsing the weekend declaration from Iraq's leader that final victory over the Islamic State has been achieved in his country.

"The Iraqi security forces, under the strong wartime leadership of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi have made enormous progress in the fight against ISIS," Col. Rob Manning, a Pentagon spokesman, told reporters at a press briefing. "We congratulate all those who fought, and remember all those who died."

While the overall threat has diminished and ISIS no longer holds any significant territory in Iraq, combat operations continue, including fierce firefights against pockets of remaining ISIS fighters.

Comment: Maybe it's in the best interest of the US to hold off on declaring "mission accomplished" in Iraq to maintain the guise that their forces are still needed there. See also:


Attention

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein: DOJ employees are allowed to be partisan

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
© Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg/Getty ImagesDeputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
A top Justice Department official clarified to Congress on Wednesday that all federal employees, even those investigating Donald Trump's campaign for president and any involvement of the Russian government in meddling with the 2016 election, are entitled to their political views and the expression of those views does not disqualify them from conducting their jobs effectively.

The statements from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein came as Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee consistently sounded the alarm over private text messages that showed several members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's staff were critical of President Trump, as well as political contributions they have made. Rosenstein said it would have been a violation of federal prohibited personnel practices to consider the political affiliation of applicants for any Justice position.

"One of the advantages I bring to the job is having been in and around the department for a while and I've seen mistakes that have been made in the past and that is precisely one of the issues I've discussed with our political appointees, that we're not going to do that," Rosenstein said. "That we're not going to improperly consider political affiliation with regard to career employment."

Comment: But you see, the problem isn't that the DOJ employees have a political affiliation (everyone, to some degree or another, has a political affiliation). It's that the political affiliations they have cause them to bias the work they're supposed to be doing. When a top dog at the FBI is rabidly anti-Trump and uses his position to protect one member of the administration while actively working to take down another, that's bias and is unacceptable.