OF THE
TIMES
For the full breakdown of how the whole operation actually works (the failed forecasts, the business model, the endless hype vs. results), see this detailed exposé:No inforrmation in this blog about the author, no other posts, and no links to anything else. The looks like a hit piece, and a personal feud.
[Link]
Fair point — I get why it looks suspicious at first glance.To me, it looks like a personal vendetta. I do the vetting for my information sources myself.
When someone has been exposing the same operation for years with zero funding, zero team, and zero desire for personal fame, the blog stays minimal by design.You forgot "zero identity". Unless the author - I just assume it is you or someone close to you - does not reveal anything about himself or his involvement in this story, I can't take this site serious.
The blog has the receipts (plea deal, hidden assets rulings, Socrates performance reality).He would not be the first one to framed by the deep state. Which sounds equally plausible to me.
personal vendetta:
framed by the Deep State:
zero identityand
I can't take this site serious:
I stopped explaining myself when I realized people only understand something from their own level of perception.So we both value letting the evidence speak for itself. That’s exactly what my blog does — it lets Armstrong speak for himself, especially on topics like nuclear war being “survivable” while he sells Socrates to time it.
Fair concern. My screen name here is LuiBunting.I don't mean your account, your avatar or your comments here.
I am the author.That's what I thought. Just saying.
Just putting it out there for those who vet every source the same way. Curious what others think — are we really getting valuable insight here, or just another layer of the illusion?My vote is another layer of the illusion. I would place Armstrong as a media source that targets those individuals that reside in 'Camp 2' [Link]
Camp 1 is for the “normies” who uncritically accept official narratives and generally believe whatever the legacy media tells them. They get their talking points from “the news.”
...
Camp 2 is for those who have doubts about Camp 1. They may realize, for instance, that commercial airliners cannot completely destroy 110-story steel-framed skyscrapers, let alone collapse a 47-story steel-framed building without touching it.
They realize that they have been lied to about highly significant events – by their own governments and by the broadcasters they once thought they could trust. They endure the emotional and psychological dislocation caused by that realization.
They discover, with relief, that they are not alone in Camp 2. There are many others like them who have lost trust in mainstream institutions and are asking critical questions about how power really works in today’s world. Some fall for the deceit that “we’re all in together,” united in the struggle against Camp 1.
What they do not realise is that Camp 2 is just another holding pen. From the very beginning, it was designed to hoover up sceptics and contain dissent. Social media is, in that respect, a social containment mechanism.
Camp 2 is led by well-known figures who dominate the “alternative media” scene. Their view counts tend to be artificially boosted by algorithms. Even when they are temporarily “cancelled,” they emerge in a better position than they were before.
Their role it is to win the trust of those in Camp 2, only to keep a lid on potential resistance in various ways.
Although they tell the truth on certain issues, their purpose is ultimately malign, i.e., to distract and mislead dissenters, so that the ugliest truths (which underpin the power structure) do not enter into public consciousness. Like the three witches in Macbeth , they “win us with honest trifles, to betray [u]s in deepest consequence.”
...
" I have a teenager who is considering military service and I can give this team my highest complement from President Trump, to the heads of the joints chiefs, to the secretary of war, I would say, that I would trust my child's life in their hands "...
The elites are happy to send our kids (and now even women) to die for their endless wars and power games, while laughing at the very idea of their own children paying the price.
Von der Leyen’s reaction says everything — they truly believe the rules don’t apply to them. We’re not allowed to win.
The game is rigged from the top, and anyone promising you can beat the system with perfect forecasts and insider cycles is usually selling something .
Armstrong’s take sounds compelling… but if we’re serious about questioning all narratives (not just the mainstream ones), it’s worth looking deeper.
Google “Armstrong ECM scam” or “Armstrong scam business model” and you’ll find some very uncomfortable court-documented realities and a long pattern that doesn’t match the guru image.
For the full breakdown of how the whole operation actually works (the failed forecasts, the business model, the endless hype vs. results), see this detailed exposé:
[Link]
Just putting it out there for those who vet every source the same way. Curious what others think — are we really getting valuable insight here, or just another layer of the illusion?