© Konstantin-Postumitenko.CanvaPro72Silence
The poll also showed that ideological gaps between left-leaning and right-leaning students are widening.
When respondents were asked how much the statement "words can be violence" describes their thoughts, 47 percent answered with "completely" or "mostly." Twenty-eight percent said it describes their thoughts "somewhat," and 15 percent said "slightly."
Additionally, around 59 percent of students said "silence is violence" describes their views at least "somewhat," though only 28 percent said it describes their thoughts "completely" or "mostly."
FIRE Chief Research Advisor Sean Stevens said in a news release following the poll:
"When people start thinking that words can be violence, violence becomes an acceptable response to words. Even after the murder of Charlie Kirk at a speaking event, college students think that someone's words can be a threat. This is antithetical to a free and open society, where words are the best alternative to political violence."The poll also showed that moderate and conservative students have grown less supportive of disruptive or violent tactics to stop campus speakers, while liberal students' support for those tactics has stayed the same or risen slightly compared to the spring.
At the same time, moderate and conservative students have become more open to allowing controversial speakers, while liberal students have maintained or increased their opposition to those speakers.
In particular, opposition among liberal students "increased considerably" to a speaker who previously said "The police are just as racist as the Ku Klux Klan" and "Children should be allowed to transition without parental consent," according to the survey report.
FIRE conducted the survey in collaboration with College Pulse to evaluate campus free speech after Charlie Kirk's Sept. 10 assassination at Utah Valley University. The poll contained 21 questions and was given to 2,028 undergrads to gauge their comfort with a range of sensitive topics.
Half of the students surveyed said Kirk's assassination has made them less willing to attend or host controversial events on campus, and about 20 percent reported feeling less comfortable even going to class.
A majority of students said the incident made no difference in their willingness to speak up on controversial political topics in class. However, 19 percent said they felt a "great deal" less comfortable and 26 percent said they felt "slightly" less comfortable.
Key TakeawaysThese key takeaways were generated using AI and reviewed by an editor.
- A significant majority of undergraduate students believe in the concept that 'words can be violence', with 47% agreeing strongly with this sentiment.
- There is an increasing ideological divide on campus, with moderate and conservative students becoming more accepting of controversial speakers while liberal students show greater opposition.
- The assassination of Charlie Kirk has impacted students' willingness to engage with controversial events, affecting half the respondents' desire to attend or host such events.
That right there is an inconvenient nontruth.
vi·o·lence/ˈvī(ə)lən(t)s/nounnoun: violencebehavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.Similar:brutalitybrute forceroughnessferocityfiercenesssavagery crueltysadismbarbaritybarbarousnessbruti shnessmurderousnessbloodthirstinessruthl essnessinhumanityheartlessnesspitilessne ssmercilessnessstrong-arm tacticsferityforcefulnessforcefull forcepowerpowerfulnessstrengthmightdestr uctivenessOpposite:gentlenesskindnessweaknessstrength of emotion or an unpleasant or destructive natural force."I was surprised at the violence of my feelings"Similar:intensityseveritystrengthforcegreat forcevehemencepowerfulnesspowerpotencyfe rocityforcefulnesswildnessfrenziednessfu rystorminesstempestuousnessturbulencelac k of controllack of restraintpassionatenessfervencyardencyOp posite:mildnessLawthe unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.Phrasesdo violence to — damage or adversely affect."how can we regulate access to weapons without doing violence to the constitution?"