© Charles Krups/APHarvard University
It is akin to Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger (D) referring to the "poor choice" of words of her endorsed candidate for attorney general, Jay Jones, when he said that he wanted to kill his political opponents and their children.
These figures reflect the cynical calculation that apologies are just background music in an age of rage — heard but not really registered.
Davis personifies the unblinking hypocrisy of Harvard. For several months, Harvard faculty have been portraying themselves as victims of political intolerance after the Trump administration sought to force the university to restore intellectual diversity in its departments. The same faculty that spent years purging conservatives and dissenters from their school hyperventilated at the notion that anyone else should object to ideological conformity.
For the record, I opposed measures directed at Harvard as inimical to free speech and academic freedom. Harvard has long been an example of the destruction of higher education in America and the lowering of academic standards to achieve far-left policies. However, Harvard is hardly worthy of sympathy, but it is not worth sacrificing the core principles of free speech to go after it.
Years ago, Harvard faculty and students cancelled House Dean Ronald S. Sullivan Jr., a Harvard Law professor, because he dared to represent someone they disliked. Sullivan was fired after he offered legal advice to disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. Harvard College Dean Rakesh Khurana yielded to the mob and declared that Sullivan had to go because "the situation is untenable."
So far, there is nothing "untenable" about House Dean Davis, who has encouraged hatred toward police, spewed racist viewpoints, and shrugged off the possible deaths of conservatives.
After President Trump contracted COVID-19 in 2020, Davis reportedly wrote, "F — that guy" and added, "I don't — at all — blame people wishing Trump ill." He later reposted the gif from Rocky IV where Ivan Drago says, "If he dies, he dies."
Critics have unearthed a long string of such unhinged, violent and hateful postings by Davis. He has responded with an effective shrug, insisting that his comments were "made on social media prior to my start in the Resident Dean role." Some have challenged that claim as a lie, insisting that his call for people to "hate police" came when he was the Interim Resident Dean of Dunster House.
Even if these statements were made entirely before Harvard selected him, they would still be damning. This was not a case where a faculty member or a house dean revealed himself as an extremist after tenure or appointment. Davis never hid his radicalism. Indeed, for Harvard, it might have been part of his attraction.
Not long before his appointment, Davis suggested that "Whiteness is a self-destructive ideology that annihilates everyone around it. By design." As a professor of critical race theory at UCLA and "gender identity law" at Southwestern Law School, Davis has helped fuel race-based anger against conservatives and police. He has written that everyone "should ask your cop friends to quit since they're racist and evil." In another post, he explained how "Rioting and looting are parts of democracy just like voting and marching."
Davis encouraged students who are "Black or otherwise of color, queer, neurodivergent (ADHD), first-generation, a public high school graduate, from a low-income background, or from urban areas" to reach out to him for advice.
Like many radicals exposed for hateful comments, Davis deleted his postings and offered a perfunctory apology. It is the type of "check-the-box" apology that is now so common. Liberals like Zohran Mamdani spent years denouncing the law enforcement and calling for defunding of police, only to offer the same shrugged apologies when he ran for mayor. None of their radical supporters believes the apology any more than their critics. The key is that it was made, and the media can now move on without causing real damage.
Davis describes himself on the school website as "a Black, queer, neurodivergent (ADHD), first-generation, public school graduate from Detroit." He encourages students, therefore, to "feel comfortable showing off [their] whole self with [him]." That hardly seems an inviting prospect if you are one of those "evil" people who want to go into law enforcement or one of those whose deaths appear to be of little concern to him.
Still, Davis has little to fear. He hates the right groups. His rage is not dangerous but righteous.
After all, he did not offer representation to any unpopular defendant. At Harvard, that would be "untenable."
Reader Comments
Brave AI: "The Open Society Foundations (Soros) support initiatives focused on justice, good governance, democracy, and human rights, and their funding to universities often aligns with these goals. For example, Harvard has received support for programs related to social justice and public policy. The foundation's funding is typically directed toward specific projects or institutional capacity-building rather than general operating funds, and it often supports research, scholarships, and academic programs that promote open societies and civic engagement. "
"The foundation’s grants to Ivy League schools are part of a broader strategy to strengthen democratic institutions and promote equity through education , but they do not represent the primary source of funding for these universities, which rely more heavily on their own endowments and federal research grants."
I'd never hire a Harvard grad, simply because I don't believe in school branding. Like the $1000 t-shirt made next to the $5 tshirt. Same quality.
Not long before his appointment, Davis suggested that "
WhitenessWokeness is a self-destructive ideology that annihilates everyone around it. By design.