OF THE
TIMES
As soon as “Christians” figure out that Zionists hate them and would treat them the same if they weren’t stealing so much money from US.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. — John F. Kennedy, March 13, 1962
This is a predictable outcome when a wild animal is removed from its native environment and relocated to an area with an indigenous population...
Has Israhell ever actually contributed anything to the world?
And what, exactly, does the EU gain by this?
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Reader Comments
permeated with Luciferian characters and elements.
Protocol 10- "But you yourselves perfectly well know that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, by want, so that the GOYIM see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else."
It's the right-wing version of the idea of original sin.
Here a few quotes from Mencken, I subscribe to all of them : Pick you favourite ...
In theory a country (like the UK) is ruled by a PM who runs a cabinet which make important decisions which are then passed (or not) in the HOC by a majority won from a large number of MPs.
So at first glance it is a Meritocracy – those who ascended to these high positions are most talented and thus they rule.
But at a second glance, if you look at those who run it, it is a plutocracy – the rule by the rich (There's no one in the cabinet who lives on benefits).
But in this dark world, let's imagine a made up country and a PM and a cabinet like this, special people that have so many irons in the fire, people of a type who would argue they throw out ethics for what they say is political pragmatism.
Could it be that these are massively dictated to by those above them (and who maybe made them filthy rich and got them their prime job in the first place)? The friends of corporations, friends of countries, trillionaires of the world, the movers and shakers of banks, hedge funds and governments, banks of big continents.
The PM and cabinet quake in such company and are always eager to please.
So in this case we see that democracy at the top is systematically difficult, but as we run down the pyramid, democracy – I would posit – still exists. And one can see it has more success when concerning local needs and local admins. But the percentage is shrinking. The more local and regional democracy is increased the better for all of course. But history over the past 40 years has contracted it in every level of government. Maybe tens of thousands of years ago, a wise committee made its decisions on information that was coming from the bottom, where REAL democracy lives. Now faux democracy is all top down, and citizens wonder who are dictating it. And many BIG decisions that affect us all, are now implemented when initiated by unknown flea-size minorities .
Like quanta, democracy is neither 1 and 0 but fluctuates somewhere between.
Look how democracic parties and elections are organized in the West. What legal hurdles it takes to establish a party, and how much money one needs to even get into and stay in the race.
Next topic of interest would be media, ownership of those, and psychology (of the masses). How many people made rational decisions about the experimental euthanasia shot, based on facts ? It is not different with any other topic, politics and elections being one of them.
I say, none of this is coincidental, but intrinsic.
Cf. the Oswald Spengler quote "Democracy is the weapon of the high finance".
Yes 2024 looks like a very bumpy ride. I see a wounded Tyranosaurus Rex flailing about doing things that brings the whole forest down with it.
I'm sure I must be wrong.