"Society lives and acts only in individuals.... Everyone carries a part of society on his shoulders; no one is relieved of his share of responsibility by others. And no one can find a safe way out for himself if society is sweeping towards destruction. " — Ludwig von MisesRemember, you are a sovereign individual and the blob in our nation's capital city is an undifferentiated mass of feckless protoplasm. You contain a cosmos of ideas and aspirations. The blob is an agglomeration of sham and failure. The blob stands for itself, not for our country. You and I can stand for our country.
Remember, also, that the economy of our country at its best was the sum of choices made by sovereign individuals, while the economy of the blob is a gelatinous buildup of unsound hypothesis having nothing to do with the pursuit of happiness. We sense this in the menacing rumors of a Federal Reserve digital currency, which entails the rehypothecation of our hopes and dreams into the blob's waste-stream, turning everything we do — it can't be put delicately — into shit.
The Fed digital currency will be used to cover-up the failure of end-state financialization of the economy. Finance, you understand, used to be a module of the economy, with a particular role to play. The purpose of finance, formerly, was to marshal surplus wealth from prior productive activity to make new productive activity possible. Financialization, however, does not do that. Financialization was an effort to replace the economy of real production with a hologram of production. Financialization is a racket — and a racket, remember, is an effort to get something for nothing, that is, dishonestly. The blob feeds and thrives on dishonesty, its favorite food.
Financialization seeks to replicate value not from wealth-producing activity but from things that only claim to represent wealth: stocks, bonds, currencies, and anything else that can pretend to hold value, clear up to notions and wishes. Its operations are based on "derivatives" because they aim to derive additional "wealth" from things that signify wealth, but which are not wealth itself. Each iteration of a derivative further abstracts its value from the real things originally signified, such as revenue-producing businesses, interest-bearing loans, leases, and contracts for delivery of commodities. Derivatives can be understood as false wealth, and when enough of them accumulate in a financialized economy, they will blow up the economy, spewing wreckage across an economic landscape.
Many observers of that landscape await such a blow up at any time now. They say it can take the form of a stock market crash, a bond market failure, bank shut-downs, and disorders in money (currencies). All of that can impoverish and immiserate a lot of people. We are living through a corrosive early phase of that now, the overture of a big blow up itself. The effects are felt keenly through the middle classes, who struggle in futility to pay their bills, keep their cars running, and feed their children.
The financialized economy was primed to blow up in September of 2019 when symptoms of severe distress materialized in an arcane corner of the system known as the reverse repo market where banks loan each other money on extremely short term, usually overnight, to provide so-called "liquidity" — meaning the appearance of solvency. The crisis expressed itself as a dangerously sharp rise in interest rates. The Fed came up with enough liquidity to paper over the crisis, and then, miraculous to relate, the Covid-19 "emergency" a few months later gave them cover to "print" trillions of dollars and distribute the "money" rapidly into the on-the-ground economy where people bought the things of daily life.
The result of that monetary mischief was today's inflation. Inflation, of course, is one way of going broke. You have a lot of money that is increasingly worthless. The other way of going broke is deflation, where you have no money. In the aggregate of a deflation, nobody will have any money, so at least you'll have company in the misery of being broke. My guess is that a grievous deflation is where the current situation is headed. Deflations are provoked when people and companies can't meet their debt obligations — can't "service" their loans (pay interest), or pay back contracted sums of borrowed money, or simply can't pay their bills. Every loan that goes bad causes some money to disappear — poof! — and when a whole lot of that happens there is no money.
The Federal Reserve digital currency is a kind of last resort way around that. It is a simple way for the system to pretend there is a lot of money around when there really isn't any. It has the huge additional advantages, by way of computerized accounting, to allow the authorities to control what everybody spends their money on, especially the ability to block the purchase of this or that: a train ticket, gasoline, meat, if the authorities feel like it. It also enables the authorities to extract taxes, duties, and penalties at will, without any cooperation from the citizen. A Fed digital currency would be a giant step into the worst kind of exquisitely targeted tyranny. The excuse, of course, would be a "national emergency."
A digital currency would likely first be tested among the most indigent in society, those with little or no income. It already is, actually, in the debit cards currently issued to illegal border-jumpers. Their card accounts are refilled monthly, making this the equivalent of a guaranteed basic income. Next, this privilege will be extended to the lower economic ranks of American citizens, and so on upward, until the whole middle-class and even the higher levels are enlisted, and then the authorities will have the ability to push everyone around.
That's the hypothesis, anyway. I don't believe it's going to work. The authorities have underestimated the number of citizens who know what it means to be sovereign individuals. They will decline to be pushed around. They might even push back, start stomping on the blob's tentacles as it reaches across the land. The citizens of one region or another of our country might go so far as to establish their own money, which would make them sovereign regions of sovereign individuals. That is going to be a problem that the blob and blobism cannot overcome.




Reader Comments
When states and regions need to"... establish their own money, which would make them sovereign regions of sovereign individuals... " then the country has failed and there isn't much use in being patriotic - it's now all about survival.
I don't find his line of thinking very hopeful.
their candles, singing together, while he looked down on them with disdain, and worked to centralize power and control. That's what they all do - all the damn minor psychopaths, the political figureheads that carry water for the big psychopaths.
Will people give their power away to another one of these figureheads - RFK, Trump, whoever - to be their savior so they can justify passivity and dependency? We'll see.
Certainly there will be pockets of 'Constitutional' Americans but they will be relatively small and they will teeter on the edge of existence fighting against the 'new Americans' for food, supplies and life.
Massive deficits, no ammunition for weapons, no actual friendly nations, slow return to manufacturing etc.
Will Mexico take over the west and south of USA? Having 'money' does not mean there will be food to be bought ... ?
What I know I’ve mostly learned from listening to Peter Schiff and Mario Inneco who has the Maneco64 YT channel. Mario often quotes Von Mises. Another interesting commentator is Rabi Faber aka. The Endgame Investor who can be found on YT. Mario has regular interviews with many other commentators who are all worth listening to if you’re interested in knowing what will likely be the next plot twist in the financial shit show.
Most commentators think that the Fed will print money when the next financial crisis occurs which will ultimately lead to hyperinflation. The Ponzi scheme which is our fiat currency system (only gold and silver are real money) needs evermore of the fiat to be constantly created. Credit expansion by the banks usually suffices (it’s the increase in the money supply that is actually inflation - price rises are the effect of this inflation) but after the 2008 financial crisis the FED printed. It did so again during Covid which I believe was a cover for a financial system bailout in response to the late 2019 Repo crisis mentioned in the article.
Some commentators believe that CDBCs will be used to usher in new currencies to replace the current debt mired ones. The US will replace the Dollar with the Digital Dollar. Bitcoin is suggested to be the trailblazer of CDBCs. It’s being used to create the technology infrastructure and public acceptance of digital currencies. Nations will ultimately walk away from their old currencies as they hyper-inflate them, leaving behind their national debts that are priced in those old currencies. However this will destroy savings and also pensions as many of these hold bonds or government debts. This will amount to a currency reset.
It’s anticipated that Universal Basic Income will be paid through CDBCs both to encourage their use but also to provide financial aid during a time when the economy will be in turmoil. The good news will be that governments will be unencumbered by debt so will be relatively free to spend. The bad news will be that no one will trust the new digital fiat currency although most will have no alternative.
The really bad news will be the control exerted over us via CDBCs.
I will try to be concise, but maybe not. "Society" is a construct. This means that there is no solid reality there. It is just the same as stocks, bonds and fiat, all of which are constructs too; there is no "there" there. The thing about constructs is that, unless you want to be considered really wacko, you have to engage with other people so that together you can pretend they are real, even if you can't define or agree about the construct, other than that it exists (e.g. Can't really say what a "woman" is). This, the denial of a REAL thing, individuals, in favor of a construct such as society, is the cause of endless problems. Unless and until, when your arm is cut I feel the pain, there is no actual WE. Anybody can say anything they want about constructs EXACTLY because they are not real, and there is no test that anyone outside the construct can use to convince those inside the construct that there is something wrong with their thinking (or most often, their feelings).
Therefore, anything anyone says about constructs (other than that they are not real) is complete and utter bullshit. If you can't get away from the bullshit, start looking for each individual's motive to pretend that their constructs are real. It might be wise to have a gun handy. There be dragons.
Hmm...?
You make a good point in your comment, lots to think about. Thanks.