Puppet Masters
Russian forces have gained more territory in Ukraine this year than the Ukrainian side despite the Ukrainian counteroffensive that was launched in June, The New York Times reported on Thursday.
The report noted that despite nine months of heavy fighting in Ukraine, only about 500 square miles of territory have changed hands this year. Russia has gained 331 square miles while Ukraine has gained 143, a difference of 188, which amounts to Russia's net gain in territory so far this year.
Most of the fighting in the first half of the year focused around the Donbas city of Bakhmut, which Russia fully captured in May after a brutal battle that started in August 2022. Ukraine's counteroffensive has focused on the south, but fighting has continued near Bakhmut and across the entire eastern front.
The Times quoted Marina Miron, a postdoctoral researcher in war studies at King's College London, who said Russia appears to be comfortable holding the territory it currently controls rather than seeking rapid gains.
"It's not losing anything by not moving forward," Miron said. "The whole strategy in Ukraine is for the Russians to let the Ukrainians run against those defenses, kill as many as possible, and destroy as much Western equipment as possible."
The report said that the situation on the battlefield comes with "huge risks" for Ukraine since it could lose Western support without significant gains. "Russia is trying to wait out until the West turns its back," Miron said.
Leading up to the Ukrainian counteroffensive, the Discord leaks and media reports revealed that the US did not believe Ukraine could regain much territory from Russia. But the Biden administration pushed for the assault anyway and rejected the idea of a ceasefire.
The Wall Street Journal reported in July that Western officials knew Ukrainian forces didn't have enough training or equipment for their counteroffensive but hoped they would be able to break through anyway.
The lack of progress in the counteroffensive has not fazed the Biden administration, which is determined to support an open-ended conflict. Hawks in Congress are trying to sell the proxy war as a success since Russia is taking losses and no Americans are dying, demonstrating a lack of concern for Ukrainian lives.
Reader Comments
What matters: Russia has gained more territory this year than UkraineNo, they haven't.
Territory is not lost or gained during a war.
Or else, tell me in what WWI battle exactly did the Austro-Hungarian empire lose their Yugoslavian territories ? Or Czechoslovakia, or Hungary, for that matter ?
Territorial losses and gains are only fixed in the peace treaty once the war is concluded.
The Russians know this, and don't care about temporal ebb and flow.
Unlike the propaganda and media-stunt-fixated Ukraine and their Western masters.
See Germany in 1870/71 in the war against France, which ended the second empire (Napoleon III) and which was succeeded by the third republic - they had to relinquish the Elsass / Alsache region to the newly founded German Empire.
Or WW1, where the German Empire was succeeded by the Weimar Republic and lost much land.
The Austro-Hungarian Empire you mentioned was succeeded by the first Austrian Republic which gouverned the "core" german speaking land, Austria, although the Italians also grabbed the (until today) mostly German speaking Southern Tyrol, today known as Alto Adige.
After WW2, the Third Reich was succeeded by the Federal Republic and the German Demcratic Republic, and lost land.
So, I conclude that the loosing side must totally loose and their gouvernment must change - not always by killing those in power, but they must be removed from power for good. The German Emperor lived a quiet life in the Netherlands, Napoleon II in the UK, the last Austrian Emperor in Switzerland and Portugal (Madeira).
So, I conclude that the loosing side must totally loose and their gouvernment must change - not always by killing those in power, but they must be removed from power for good.Optionally, but IMHO not necessarily.
Earlier wars in Europe were concluded the same way - at the negotiation table. Most often the loser ceded territory, but not always with a change in government. The latter comes from internal issues and instabilities.
This is just an impartial assessment of history. I sincerely wish the conclusion of the Ukraine conflict brings about regime changes not only to Kiev itself, but to the EU and the US as well. The rotten empire Western of corruption, depravity and hubris.
The country, i.e. it's current territory, is at the heart of the Anglo-Saxon world domination plans, according to (but not only) the Mackinder theory and Brzeziński (a Mackinder disciple). The empire knows, if they lose the Ukraine their domination plans are buried. This is why they hold on so frantically, with their methods and action become more desparate and irrational by the day.
The Russians know this, too. They understood from the first day, they are in a existential conflict with the whole West. In fact, this is not the first attempt they are about to thwart, you can count in Napolean, the Crimean war 1853, WWI and WWII to that list.
There is much more at stake than the Donbas and Crimea, for both sides.
Comment: Russia will never agree to a ceasefire. Negotiations, yes always. Russia is willing to talk to everyone. But a ceasefire, no.
Moscow has been burned twice in negotiation attempts with the West. With the Minsk Agreement on the table in 2014, Russia persuaded the breakaway regions to call off their Donbass offensive when it was just on the brink of routing Ukraine's neonazi forces. The West never forced Ukraine to abide Minsk, using the time for NATO to train up a new military as was later admitted by Merkel and others. Luhansk and Donbass endured eight years of relentless shelling by Ukraine.
So for Russia, it is now total victory and nothing less, even if Ukraine disappears as a nation. It never really was one anyway.