OF THE
TIMES
They found a U-shaped curve with the greatest hesitancy among the least and most educated Just goes to show how indoctrinated the middle class is due to the education system. A great success for TPTB.I agree on all counts too. Particularly the above point is salient. And depressing. And hard to do anything about. They've wrested absolute control of academia. Private schools can only go so far in helping, and many of them are just as bad anyway.
The vaccines do however reduce the risk of severe illness and death, allowing many to suffer milder infection, gaining natural immunity and pushing the country closer to herd immunity.This is something I've been wondering about. How does being vaccinated affect ones ability to develop broad, long-lasting natural immunity from a subsequent infection? The author's statement indicates he assumes not at all. I haven't seen any real discussion on this. Stated another way - I'm wondering if the vaccination campaign is actually preventing herd immunity by keeping people from developing real, robust, long-lasting immunity from natural infection because when they get a breakthrough case the immune system is unable to respond normally and create such immunity.
If you have developed broad and lasting natural immunity from infection, will getting the jab degrade that?
There's also a news report about how blood donation centres are refusing vaxxed blood as it removes antibodies [Link]Thanks for that! First thing I've seen that directly answers the questions I have about the effect of the jab on pre-existing natural immunity. Other than the standard line that it will provoke another antibody spike (how could it not?) but that says nothing about it's true effect on the previously existing broad, long-lasting immunity. The clip you linked only refers to the jab's effect on pre-existing antibodies, not B or T cells, so a lot more needs to be known. But if the jab screws up your "good" antibodies from the natural infection, other deleterious effects on your immunity would seem likely.
It's time to set the record straight once and for all that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today.from 15 studies that indicates natural immunity from prior infection is more durable than vaxx [Link] And maybe this is the real reason why they stopped accepting blood. Completely blows their narrative out the water.
Recent emerging viral variants have raised concern because of their potential to escape antibody neutralization. Wang et al. identified four antibodies from early-outbreak convalescent donors that are potent against 23 variants, including variants of concerntaken from [Link] Part of conclusion
Our study demonstrates that convalescent subjects previously infected with ancestral variant SARS-CoV-2 produce antibodies that cross-neutralize emerging VOCs with high potency.
But the final question is: Do the vaccines possibly harm the superior T cell immunity built up from prior infection? Immunologists from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid have raised serious concerns. In a shocking discovery after monitoring a group of vaccinated people both with and without prior infection, they found "in individuals with a pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the second vaccine dose not only fail to boost humoral immunity but determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response." They also note that other research has shown "the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19It's late, hope to check out the 2nd link tomorrow. But thanks again - this is a huge revelation. Amazing it was March 22 and nobody seems aware and previously infected are dutifully damaging their immunity by getting jabbed. Harm was only shown in the second jab according to the researchers - so far.
Biden's running mate, Kamala Harris, cast similar doubt saying, "I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about. I will not take his word for it." Again, it is the FDA, not the White House that is charged with approving vaccines.Who, is on whose side? Propaganda from both. Trump did shed light on how government works, but didn't stop the covid narrative.and continues the covid narrative. Never trust a Jesuit, they are worse than the alphabet spy agencies. They are more a disease than covid.
Trump can say what he wants but if the regulatory authorities say otherwise, that's as far as it goes toward approval or usage. Look at hydroxychloroquine as an example.
In a hyper-politicized country, Americans tend to believe those with whom they identify politically. Hence those on the right supporting hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic and those on the left, like Fox News' Neil Cavuto, saying "it will kill you." If the future president and vice president were vaccine-hesitant, expect many Americans to adopt that view.
Once there was a new occupant in the White House, the vaccine narrative flipped and the administration embraced the new vaccines as if Biden and Harris conceived of and developed them, rather than having the vaccines and a robust rollout dropped on their laps when they strolled into the White House.
Nope. It was never even researched, they only went for lesser symptoms, and was in their own proposal papers from the get go!
Just goes to show how indoctrinated the middle class is due to the education system. A great success for TPTB.
๐ค hesitant? Not me. I don't hesitate to reject both.
And lastly...
I'm not an anti-vaxxer. I'm anti-Pharma full stop.