Secret History
Five caves in Tennessee have yielded more to the idea that electric skies and plasma displays recorded around the planet occurred in S.E USA skies as well as the western U.S. With an additional electromagnetic field forming in the outer solar system in 2024, perhaps we should begin looking for massive sink holes and landslides as an indicator that cave art was a warning to future generations.
Simple question: Were Cherokee and Prehistoric Sites Flooded to Hide Global Timelines in East Tennessee.
Sources
Reader Comments
..
"Were Cherokee and Prehistoric Sites Flooded to Hide Global Timelines in East Tennessee"?
Now, that's a good question.
TY
Sure makes you question the bullshit history they handed to us.
The coaxial polar alignment of the three planets was never successfully simulated, as hypothesized in their video by Talbott. The last that was publicly spoken about it that I can ascertain was in their attempt to model the orbital parameters, and were found to be highly unstable. Further questioning of Wal and Dwardu on this subject they avoided responding to. This was direct questioning by me via email pre2012. I had read Dwardu's Flare Star and found it highly selective of available scientific information and dismissive of anything outside his paradigm. In it he hypothesized the collapse of the coaxial system was earlier than 10Kyrs ago, but when I asked him directly by email about it, and any relevance to Egyptian mythology, he came back with a date of 2500BCE.
When Piers Corbyn presented his climatology predictions in the EU 2014(?) conference, I sent Wal a direct question concerning the veracity of Piers' findings. They're based on planetary wobbles going back 400K years (Vostok/Epica ice cores). Wal refused to comment back. The ice core conflict is not a new argument for them. Leroy Ellenberger, once a proponent of the hypothesis, took them to task over various geophysical evidences, including ice cores back in the 90s. Its a part of Wal's and Dave's "sordid" past they refuse to discuss.
As far as geophysical evidence goes, the latest comes from Nikolov and Zeller, who have been able to accurately predict planetary surface temperature as a function of solar radiation, atmospheric mass, and pressure. They have linked it to available geological data (earth) going back as far as 56My.
[Link]
Allan and Delair published a book examining the catastrophic history of the earth in Cataclysm! 1997 (US) The Day the Earth Nearly Died 1995 (UK). The scenario they relate is a large body comet (Large planetoid/small star in Sumerian lore) than came through the solar system around 9500BCE. I've investigated a few of their sources and found them wanting, but in the main their information is reasonably reliable.
My opinion is the upheaval that Wal and Dave (the most wresting of writers I've ever encountered in the annals of science and history) claim precipitating their planetary breakup was this wandering planetoid. Dr Thomas Brophy published The Origin Map in 2002, where he analyzes the Giza Plateau star alignments and the Calendar Circle of Nabta Playa. The implications of his findings strongly support a catastrophe ca 11KBCE, and knowledge of the star patterns behind the Zodiac Ages. Some of his dates for start alignments go back to 33KBCE.
Then there are the star chart paintings, in the Lescaux caves which have been well dated to 17KBCE, also examined by Chantal Jègues-Wolkiewiez [Link]
I've done some of my own solar system analysis a couple of years ago, verifying the feasability of a planet once existing in the asteroid zone. The Sumerian myths speak of a planet once orbiting there that was destroyed by the passing planetoid. My findings, based on 1/1½ gravities of earth came up with a fairly large body consistent with the rotational, gravitational, and elemental curves of the solar system bodies. It also pointed to Uranus and Neptune to be possible early interlopers, since their elemental construction, gravitational fields and axial rotations do not align with the rest of the solar system.
What about Velikovsky? He suggested that Venus was a comet that caused planetary disruptions. Dr. Velikovsky predicted in the 1950's that Venus would be found terribly hot when Orthodoxy insisted it was cold. The Venus fly-by found it hot as hell. Coincidence of course. We know it's coincidence, because we know that Honorable Men of the present day inquisition would not conspire to suppress information unless the information is totally nefarious. Velikovsky predicted in the 1950's that Jupiter would be found to produce radio emissions. Forty plus years ago such emissions were found.
Incidentally, I have spent a lot of time talking with people who take Velikovsky seriously, and they have not yet convinced me that his particular catastrophe happened exactly as he described it. I don't really care about that. What I do care about is the threat to my own free speech-and yours-posed by the mentalities that tried so hard and so long to suppress Dr. Velikovsky's right to think and to publish. But I digress...
Fundamentalism, any fundamentalism stops thought and perception, whereas model-agnosticism encourages us to think further and look more deeply. Thanks again for the links...