Objective:Health: Germ Theory vs. Terrain Theory - Why Not Both?

Sott.net
Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:00 UTC

Thanks to Louis Pasteur, a cornerstone of our modern medicine has been based on the notion of 'killing germs'. But current science is telling us that struggling against germs is not an accurate portrayal of what it means to be healthy.

Rather than thinking of our bodies as a battlefield, humans and microbes must now be seen as a co-evolved system for the mutual benefit of both the host and resident microbes. Health is the result of balanced harmony between resident microbes and human cells.

But alas, the germ theory is holding strong, with every new disease, no matter how benign (*cough* covid...), setting the medical establishment into full military mode, trying to come up with vaccines and medications to eradicate 'the enemy'. This paradigm has been with us for well over a century and yet we seem to have come to a dead end. Perhaps the mainstream medical establishment needs to incorporate some of Terrain theory into its tool kit to truly get to the bottom of human disease and how to deal with it.

Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we look into where both germ theory and terrain theory get it right (and wrong).

And check us out on Brighteon!

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth

♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.

Running Time: 00:39:34

Download: MP3 — 36.2 MB

Reader Comments

Joyly · 2020-08-12T12:19:25Z

The germ theory is the basis of the vaccine industry; the terrain theory puts responsibility where it belongs to strengthen your own immune system. (No money in that for big Pharma). David Rockefeller probably had a hand in that.

Anna1 · 2020-08-12T14:48:44Z

Could the answer be as simple as having an intolerance, along a spectrum of severity according to the individual, to certain foods, insects or other beings?

Fish swim in a sea of excretion.

Similarly...

People walk in a realm rich in airborne excretions, churned up by our own actions (like the dust in a room when you puff up the cushions).

This is the reality but I am not a microbiologist.

We each consume and absorb minute particles shed by the living. This state of existence can become overwhelmingly toxic to people when immersed in too much decay, I perceive.

Some people have a stronger defence mechanism than others.

Joyly · 2020-08-12T15:01:02Z

Anna1 I don’t think any intolerance is natural; I think our bodies were designed to work perfectly. Any intolerance has developed due to some inhibitor being introduced like mercury, aluminium, glyphosate, gmo wheat, corn etc, and vaccines. Man has caused the intolerance.

adipocere · 2020-08-16T19:12:13Z

Anna1 existence can become overwhelmingly toxic to people when immersed in too much decay

Interesting perception - that has never occurred to me...

I have been more in tune with my health and my sons - especially illness - these last couple of years than in my whole life. I swear up and down now that air pollution in the city where I live is the spark for the majority of my illnesses which turn into colds and bacterial infections. For example, on "bad air days" if I have to walk outside for a long time, my throat will hurt - while I am walking - and that sore throat will linger for days and sometimes evolve into a bacterial infection or cold or hacking cough.

tom2 · 2020-08-17T20:28:14Z

Anna1 "People walk in a realm rich in airborne excretions..." I am reminded of Gurdjieff's sparrows and horse manure. One species lives on the eliminations of another. Plants excrete oxygen. If plants could talk, I can imagine them saying, "How good it is that humans consume our nasty oxygen and give us delicious carbon dioxide in its place!"

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T20:35:20Z

tom2 I perceive that plants do communicate.

Trees (for example) have an average age older than ours. They are grounded and fixed in their traditionalist, conservative morality and somewhat prim mentality. IMO from a person who has spent hours in meditation trying to interpret their level of consciousness.

tom2 · 2020-08-17T21:26:00Z

tom2 I perceive that plants do communicate.

Trees (for example) have an average age older than ours. They are grounded and fixed in their traditionalist, conservative morality and somewhat prim mentality. IMO from a person who has spent hours in meditation trying to interpret their level of consciousness.

We have different trees. Mine (loblolly pines) are bossy and overwhelming -- Jupiter types or Point Eights on the Enneagram of Personality -- stately columns wielding widow-maker limbs. Like Damocles, I wander among them at the risk of my life. If they have any gratitude for my planting them 60 years ago, I don't sense it. Maybe you associate with a more modest class of plants.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T21:29:33Z

tom2 Cute!

Plants need us to tidy up their windfall and to provide food.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T21:33:00Z

tom2 How wonderful to plant trees and watch them grow for 60 years. What foresight. I am grateful.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T21:34:39Z

Anna1 Plants do not need us. If we left the windfall where it landed it becomes their food. That is how God designed it.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T21:52:25Z

Joyly No I disagree.

Windfall left unattended is processed by insects and minutia, many of which cause DISEASE to plants. If people tended the garden, as God taught in Genesis, each realm could exist in more tolerable proportions and perfect harmony.

Trees like bonemeal.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T22:06:30Z

Anna1 My belief: God’s system is already perfect. And God does not create systems that require maintenance. Thinking we have to interfere with nature to protect the tree is the same as thinking we have to give our bodies meds and vaccines to kill viruses IMO.

I observe where man has imposed man’s creation on God’s system without first fully understanding God’s system, with disastrous results - destroyed the soil, polluted the waterways, reduced the body’s immunity, killing species, choking on plastics not to mention the bombing reducing countries to the Stone Age and the ongoing ravages of depleted uranium.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T22:13:43Z

Joyly I believe that, to maintain perpetual motion, planetary life, including people need to accept that we are participants and tools in that motion.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T22:18:12Z

Anna1 Yes. I want to choose carefully what kind of tool I am being - for good or evil. And I have to chose- doing nothing is a worse sin, a sin of omission.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T22:29:03Z

Joyly Presumably your choice will involve some consideration as to whether you are acting in the best interests of the planetary life force as a totality, or exclusively defending the interests of humanity.

Often I find difficulty in harmonising the apparent conflict. What is good for the planet is, I sense) always good for the totality of planetary life-force

Joyly · 2020-08-17T22:43:17Z

Anna1 The most loving action is always good for all - the planet the creatures and people. I follow an order system of love: God first; self and soul mate second; then all people; then creatures; lastly the environment.

The order is important because otherwise one can become paranoid about killing an ant, whilst pushing a person aside; greenies can tie themselves to a tree, while denying others free will to choose what they do on their own property; vegans earn themselves a backlash by their concern for animals whilst invading people’s space and violating their property rights etc.

And something we talked about the other day: process matters more than the outcome. I realise that all I have to do is the right thing (the most loving). Because I cannot control the outcome anyway (much as I might like to). For the first 70 years of my life I was trained to be outcome focused. I am learning to focus on the doing because that is all I can control.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T22:55:28Z

Joyly For some reason I am reminded of a little story I want to share.

A year or two ago I picked up a toy from a charity shop as a little gift for my grandson with whom I was about to visit.

The toy was a series of interconnected cogs on a wooden panel. If you rotated the handle of any one of the cogs the entire series would rotate. I thought of the Universe.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T23:03:25Z

Anna1 You think about how the Universe etc; It makes me think about how I am affecting every aspect of the universe with everything I choose to do or not do. If I am angry I am affecting every particle of the universe with my anger. I am creating the Universe in my likeness. I want to only affect the universe with love, and I can’t do that without truth.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T23:28:13Z

Joyly As above, so below?

= As below, so above.

Joyly ·

Anna1 Yes.

· 2020-08-17T23:57:30Z

tom2 · 2020-08-14T00:16:16Z

There is no cholera without the present of the cholera microorganism. However, there may be no cholera disease even though the microorganism is present. "Symptoms may range from none, to mild, to severe." That is, the cholera microorganism is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the occurrence of the cholera disease. [Link]

adipocere · 2020-08-16T19:02:29Z

tom2 I'd imagine that quantity matters as well.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T01:14:38Z

adipocere Maybe it means it is not causal.

tom2 · 2020-08-17T02:02:29Z

tom2 I'd imagine that quantity matters as well.

Microorganisms increase rapidly, so it should take only one, provided it finds a favorable site. Many infections require many microorganisms because most of them will not find a favorable site and cannot replicate. That is my thinking. I do not know the science.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T02:46:14Z

tom2 I am learning that bacteria and viruses are part of the terrain, and a necessary part in fighting any attack on the immune system, so corelation does not mean causal relation.

tom2 · 2020-08-17T13:19:30Z

tom2 I am learning that bacteria and viruses are part of the terrain, and a necessary part in fighting any attack on the immune system, so corelation does not mean causal relation.

I was thinking of the analogy of sowing seed. It takes only one weed seed to eventually fill a field with weeds.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T13:39:49Z

tom2 Actually there are parallels in the human biome and the soil. The bacteria, fungus and virus are just as important in the soil. I have friends who really study this. I only know a little.

If one particular weed comes and takes over as you suggested, then that indicates that the soil is lacking in some particular thing and it is that weed’s role to replace it or restore balance.

Typically modern practice comes along and sprays to rid the weed then plant GMO seed that has been designed to withstand (or absorb more) glyphosate and cause further degradation of the soil, and the deterioration of the human biome on consumption.

The taking of vaccines and meds into the human body (in addition to drugs caffeine sugar etc) has a similar effect of degradation of the biome, as the pesticides and fertilisers do to the land.

boli · 2020-08-17T03:02:48Z

Why not both, indeed?

I've felt, since the preceding century, that the cancer polydemic is the result of the non(or at least less)-functional immune systems of arguably half the population. I have posited that pretty much everyone has a variety of cancer cells, and generally (and historically) people with well-functioning immune systems have no problems, but people with compromised immune systems are in trouble when their systems are unable to contain the cancer population. I think it is also likely that a surfeit of the wrong sorts of environmental factors (eating three pounds of sugar a day) are also (although not exclusively) contributing to cancers overwhelming the body.

Long story short(er): Everyone has cancer cells, most (or is it almost half, this week?) are able to fight them off. If you bring 100 people off the street and test, I'd bet you'd come up with a remarkably high proportion with (dare I day it?) asymptomatic cancer.

ps, don't do it, or we'll be wearing butt plugs and diapers in addition to the masks...

Joyly · 2020-08-17T03:48:18Z

boli I am learning that a healthy human cell depends on the microbiome, the invisible world of bacteria fungi viruses and parasites. These were the first life on earth and all life has evolved in partnership with these microorganisms.

For more background listen to Dr Zac Bush on YouTube - any of his talks.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T13:48:19Z

Joyly There is an alternative explanation.

In meditation, the first to arrive at this watering hole we all call home, were the large creatures who came to drink.

They ate each other and pooped and pooped and pooped. Their poop muddied the crystal clear water.

Action was needed to purify the universal water reserves.

One thing led to another and before long the Creator had to create an entire food-chain menagerie of flora and fauna to maintain harmony between the created lufe-forces. So... Plants to contain excess elements and perfume air. Hardened matter to filter and cleanse the increasing landmass, and filter the water.

And (from my perception) the Creator continues to create so that our communal stage remains an habitable constant and we each might find love, pleasure, companionship and entertainment in our life-stories.

Joyly · 2020-08-17T14:19:43Z

Anna1 Your meditations are certainly vivid and imaginative. My belief is that God is a master of design. First She developed all the laws (the framework for all creation), then the universe including our world, and lastly the creatures (including humans).

All the largest creatures on the planet eat greens, and in fact the majority of species are herbivores. So I can not agree with they ‘ate each other’ then God had to design a food chain. I think God’s design already includes adaptation to accomodate different conditions and the laws already exist to bring nature back to balance.

I heard some stats recently that 75% of insect species have disappeared in the last x years (I cannot remember whether x was ten or not). And on Sott in Earth changes there have been many stories of species turning up dead far from their natural habitat. This tells me we are fast destroying the habitat of all creatures on the planet and this includes us.

‘Plants do contain ...’ All of God’s creations are multi-functional. Anyone could list hundreds of functions of a tree for example, and the same is true for all plants, rocks, sand etc.

No matter how much damage has been caused to the planet, I believe the resources have already been provided to assist recovery. I believe this is also true for the human body: I am certain everything is here to build healthy bodies with strong immune systems. The problem is for the last 100 years we have been conditioned to look for alopathic medications in preference to natural solutions.

Instead of ‘the creator continuing to create’ I believe it is for mankind to rediscover what already exists. God has already provided us with a perfect system.

Anna1 · 2020-08-17T14:29:52Z

Joyly Round and round we go.

Humanoids were the ‘large creatures’ that will go back in time.

So this is the outcome of ignorance misdirected cause what this fella do to deserve being handicapped? Now - take it another level - and wonder -...

Buffalo_Ken

Well - I suspect he'd be able to kick some immigrant ass - so hell yeah - why not?

Buffalo_Ken

There have been 5 recalibrations of the calender at various times, some of them may be duplicates, but even if there was only one that would imply...

taschen

I watched the video on rumble and it was pointed out that some of the worst results came from care homes. [Link] seems to still be there. It's a...

taschen

You all remember the last chick at the CDC - Ms. Walensky I think her name is - that bitch is gone now, but she is guilty as all out - and really...

Buffalo_Ken

Objective:Health: Germ Theory vs. Terrain Theory - Why Not Both?

Reader Comments

Latest News

Picture of the Day

Quote of the Day

Recent Comments

Quantum Quirk

Contact Us