Science & Technology
"Our findings support the idea that, for the small proportion of individuals with life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour, there may be differences in their brain structure that make it difficult for them to develop social skills that prevent them from engaging in antisocial behaviour," said lead author Christina Carlisi, a researcher at the University College London.
For the study, published in prestigious journal The Lancet, the team used an MRI machine to examine the brains of 652 participants.
The study found that the brains of people with lifelong patterns of "stealing, aggression and violence, bullying, lying, or repeated failure to take care of work or school responsibilities" were different, physically, from those of the other participants.
To wit, bullies' cortexes were substantially thinner — and their entire brains had less surface area — than the non-bully brains scanned by the scientists. Inverse's concise summary: bullies "have smaller brains."
A key exception: The brains of people who exhibited anti-social behavior as teenagers but not as adults showed no such abnormalities. That's good news for reformed bullies, but bad news for the lifers.
"Most people who exhibit antisocial behaviour primarily do so only in adolescence, likely as a result of navigating socially difficult years, and these individuals do not display structural brain differences," Carlisi said. "It is also these individuals who are generally capable of reform and go on to become valuable members of society."
What remains hazy is the question of causation — are the brains of bullies small because they're bullies, or do they become bullies because of their small brains?
Reader Comments
What remains hazy is the question of causation — are the brains of bullies small because they're bullies, or do they become bullies because of their small brains ?Or is the low level of consciousness that can manifest as an adult bully also possibly reflected in poor cortex development? Things are more complex than can be expressed or understood with simple, linear human causation models, so it's important to avoid making simple 'if-then' statements. There could be many reasons why the 'higher' centers of the brain do not develop fully. Regardless, we should develop a healthy respect for the fact that those reasons or causes always can be found in non-manifest reality. Without the 'blueprint' provided by the realm of causation that the Hindus called 'dharma'. Whatever you want to call it, manifestation always reflects this intelligence that inheres in the blueprint, not in the object. To say otherwise is tantamount to saying that a self-replicating brick will proceed to make a house. It is important that whoever can understand this will make an effort to avoid placing 'cause' where it can't exist.





