President Trump and Special Counsel Robert Mueller
On Friday, he completed that work and delivered a final report in the same understated style with which he accepted the job in May 2017. In between, he was as invisible and mythical as the Wizard of Oz, as he conducted a methodical investigation.
The letter that William P. Barr, the attorney general, sent to Congress.
- President Trump was not indicted, nor did Mueller recommend an indictment against him for collusion or obstruction.
- There were no major disagreements between Mueller and his managers at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
- The Russians who tried to interfere in the 2016 election were exposed and charged - but no American was charged with any effort to conspire with Moscow and hijack the election.
- While nearly three dozen people were charged, including a few close to the president or who worked for his campaign, no one in proximity to the president was formally charged with colluding with Russia. Most, such as former national security adviser Michael Flynn or campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, were charged with process crimes or felonies unrelated to the main case, as in Paul Manafort's secretive, multimillion-dollar foreign lobbying spree through Ukraine.
What likely won't get much debate, but unquestionably played an essential role in the history of the case and the outcome of the report, was the firm decision by Trump attorneys Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani to not let their client testify.
That's not to say the president didn't cooperate. His organization, campaign, inaugural committee and White House produced millions of pages of documents, and he submitted written answers to prosecutors about his conduct prior to Election Day. Nearly all key events were illuminated by this cooperation.
Such disclosure likely was enough to satisfy Mueller, since we know the prosecutor in the end didn't force the president to testify by subpoena.
But the Trump legal team's decision to steadfastly restrain their client from testifying - a client whose natural tendency is to fight when accused, tweet when challenged, and debate his detractors - almost certainly kept him from the sort of perjury traps that felled other figures in the case, such as Flynn and Papadopoulos, or that two decades earlier beguiled Bill Clinton as president. (Remember the Paula Jones deposition perjury?)
The public wants and deserves more transparency going forward. But while jeopardy lurked with an open criminal case, the president's lawyers took a wise course that was in his personal legal interest. And that is what lawyers are supposed to do.
Now, Mueller's investigations leave one major mission unfinished: meting out justice to the intelligence, congressional, FBI and DOJ officials who appear to have used a political dirty trick to falsely weave an unproven narrative of Russia collusion.
Unverified political opposition research never should be treated as actionable intelligence or Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) evidence, as it was in this case.
Just hours before Mueller's report arrived, new evidence emerged of just how egregious the FBI acted in the early days of the Russia probe.
Fox News's brilliant reporter Catherine Herridge obtained new text messages Friday showing Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and his chief lawyer, Lisa Page, were discussing credibility issues and "bias" about a key human source whose work was to support the FISA warrant used to first spy on the Trump campaign in October 2016.
Mccabe Page Text by on Scribd
Those credibility issues likely were hidden from the judges who approved the warrant of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page). As I have reported, the FBI also possesses emails showing concerns with the evidence it was going to use to support the FISA warrant.
Likewise the bureau didn't disclose to the court that:
- the "Steele dossier" that was the main FISA evidence was paid for with funds from Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic Party;
- Christopher Steele, the dossier's author, had told a senior DOJ official he was desperate to defeat Trump;
- most of the dossier was not verified before it was used as evidence of alleged Trump-Russia collusion; and
- agents collected statements from key defendants such as Papadopoulos and Carter Page during interactions with an FBI informant that strongly suggested their innocence.
An upcoming DOJ inspector general's report should trigger the beginning of that accountability in a court of law, and President Trump can assist the effort by declassifying all evidence of wrongdoing by FBI, CIA and DOJ officials.
Accountability also must be handed out in the court of public opinion, where senior members of Congress, such as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), and former members of the intelligence community, such as John Brennan and James Clapper, along with several major news organizations, spun tall stories of a Watergate-sized criminal conspiracy between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
Mueller's anticlimactic finish to the special counsel's probe on Friday made clear no such Trump-Putin criminal conspiracy existed. If it did, it would have been charged.
Trump can help the American public reconcile these issues, too, by declassifying all briefings to Congress's "Gang of Eight" leadership, so that the public can see what our leaders were being told behind closed doors and what they were claiming on the public airwaves.
This accountability is essential to ensuring the nation never endures another travesty like the Russia collusion narrative.
John Solomon is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal scientists' misuse of foster children and veterans in drug experiments, and numerous cases of political corruption. He serves as an investigative columnist and executive vice president for video at The Hill.
Reader Comments
to our Newsletter