"WikiLeaks's conduct - publishing truthful information of public concern as a media organization - is protected by the First Amendment," WikiLeaks lawyer Joshua Dratel wrote in a 33-page motion filed in New York City, according to the Washington Times.
Dratel called the DNC's lawsuit an "existential threat" to the organization.
He said that if the Democrats were successful in thwarting WikiLeaks, all that would remain would be "a shell of the First Amendment," with a self-censoring media intimidated by the fear of lawsuits, according to Court House News.
Dratel said a DNC victory would have a "chilling effect" on the press' exercise of constitutionally protected speech.
But Democrats pushed back on WikiLeak's argument on Friday.
"WikiLeaks engaged in an unlawful conspiracy with a hostile foreign power, and illegal activity isn't protected by the First Amendment," Adrienne Watson, the DNC's deputy communications director, told the Washington Times.
Comment: That has never been supported by any evidence.
"Beyond being wrong on the law, WikiLeaks' attempt to make this into a defense of press freedoms is offensive. The organization has allied itself with an autocratic regime that kills journalists, and together they helped elect a U.S. president whose hostility towards the free press has no precedent in American history," she said.
Comment: Jesus Christ, get over yourselves. It's not offensive, it's a fact. And if you find it offensive, grow up. Russia is not "an autocratic regime that kills journalists". And the U.S. has allied itself with a 'democratic' regime that kills journalists: Israel. Finally, there is no evidence Russia "helped elect" Trump. Seriously, can the DNC get any more delusional?
In April, the Democratic National Committee filed a civil suit against Trump campaign officials, the Russian government and WikiLeaks, alleging a widespread conspiracy to help then-candidate Donald Trump win the election.
Comment: Conspiracy theorists. Of the worst sort.
"The conspiracy constituted an act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency," said the suit, which was filed in federal district court in Manhattan.
Comment: LOL.
The suit claims WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange "shared the defendants' common goal of damaging the Democratic Party in advance of the election," stating Russia, using WikiLeaks, would disseminate information stolen from the DNC "at times when it would best suit the Trump campaign."
Meanwhile, the Trump campaign argued that the DNC's claim of a conspiracy regarding the 2016 election didn't hold water as far as the campaign was concerned -- noting that the DNC cites only Russia and WikiLeaks in its accusations, and not the Trump campaign.
"The DNC does not claim the campaign had any role in hacking its systems and stealing the materials -- it attributes that only to Russia," the campaign's filing says, according to Bloomberg. "Nor does the DNC claim the campaign played any part in publishing the stolen materials -- it attributes that only to Russia and WikiLeaks."
Reader Comments
to our Newsletter