They've been given four days to tear out the entire garden or face a fine.
Why? Because it is in their front yard, and city officials and a few neighbors don't like it.
Nathan Athans said he planted the garden in his front yard because it gets optimal sunlight. His backyard only gets sunshine for about two hours per day, and only in certain areas.
Athans told KSHB that he grows several different types of vegetables on his lawn and loves tending to his garden.
I'd probably say about 300 hours [so far this year], I spend all my free time out here.
I want my family to know where their food is coming from, I don't want to have to go to the grocery store and worry about what was done to that food.
Last summer, the city cited Athans for weeds in his garden, and he complied with the order to clean things up, and paid the fine.
But now, the city has passed a shiny new ordinance - one that Athans believes is part of a witch hunt against him.
The family started an online petition, which explains why they feel targeted:
The city's building official, Paul Loving, told KSHB that city received many complaints and that the ordinance is their solution.The city of Sugar Creek, Missouri passed an ordinance two days ago on March 28th, forbidding front yard gardens to grow food, within the first 30 feet of front yard space from the street. Mayor Matt Mallinson both passed and approved this ordinance. They gave us until April 1st to comply. We are the only house in the city with a front yard garden, and just happen to be exactly within those first 30 feet. They have been targeting us since we moved in last year, because we grew a garden in the front yard.
The petition goes on to explain the reasons the garden is so important to Athans and his family:
Unfortunately, Athans isn't the first to be subjected to harassment over growing his own food. People have been charged with crimes, threatened with jail time, and had their property destroyed for growing gardens in their own yards.We believe in sustainability, growing our food locally without pesticides and excessive fertilizer use, reducing our need for fossil fuels to import produce from other countries, countries that have little or no regulations on pesticide use. Sugar Creek is also prone to flooding, as it is located next to the Missouri River, so using our yard for growing plants instead of grass is beneficial because our garden takes in water as well as holding the soil together to prevent erosion, all while filtering out pollutants. It has helped our basement not flood during storms, prevented storm water runoff pollution, reduced fossil fuel use, helped us eat healthier, and prevented us from consuming pesticides and GMOs.
Remember, in the US, you never truly own anything.




Years ago I bought a weekend getaway in an area designated "CityName Farms" (CityName being used as a placeholder here for the actual city to maintain some modicum of privacy here). This area is rural residential/agricultural with dirt roads and minimum 1.5 acre lots (most of the lots are much bigger than these). I am one of those evil "part time" hobby farmers with a full acre wholly planted within the property out of sight of anyone unless they happen to be on my property to do some sort of work for me (iow, no one,unless they are on the property, knows that the property is anything but a country "shack in the woods" until you venture well onto the property). Now, as I mentioned, the designation for this little area of the county is called "CityName FARMS" so my question is: Why do I get insulted for having a farm by county workers and tradesman for having a farm in a farming area? IT IS apparently A MODERN MINDSET that FARMING is BAD and McManses on zero lot lines with no means of self-sufficiency are good. It is amazing how many in America think this way which is why I laugh heartily every time I hear some jackass living full time in "zero lot line ville" complaining about food prices on the one hand while calling all farmers (hobby or full time) hillbillies, crackers,or what-have-you. It seems to me that average Americans have happily joined the Idiocracy and will eventually suffer the consequences of their own self-important stupidity (who knows, maybe mass starvation could be a good means of forcing the dumbed down masses to think and become truly self-sufficient/productive/inventive again. Then again, .....).