Society's Child
"Those who voiced opposition to this bill are primarily arguing against capital punishment in general and that decision has already been made in our state," said Marty Carpenter, spokesman for Herbert, as quoted by the Guardian.
"We regret anyone ever commits the heinous crime of aggravated murder to merit the death penalty and we prefer to use our primary method of lethal injection when such a sentence is issued. However, when a jury makes the decision and a judge signs a death warrant, enforcing that lawful decision is the obligation of the executive branch."
Although Utah is not expected to execute another inmate for years, capital punishment opponents have railed against the measure.
"It's an embarrassment to Utah," Ralph Dellapiana of the group Utahns for Alternatives to the Death Penalty said to the Associated Press. "We should be taking the moral lead on this. You can' be both pro-life and pro-death."
Last week, Herbert said he was "leaning toward" signing the bill so that the state could have a viable alternative to lethal injection when the appropriate drugs are not available. He has also called the use of a firing squad "a little bit gruesome," though that did not keep him from signing the bill.
"The debate is really more than just the firing squad. It's should we have capital punishment or not?" he said at the time, according to NBC News. "It's not our preference, but we need to have a fallback."
The move comes as multiple states seek alternative methods for carrying out death penalty sentences, as many companies refuse to sell various drugs used in lethal injection combinations to state correctional departments.
Currently, death row inmates in Utah can be executed by way of a firing squad, but they must choose the option themselves. Now, the state will be able to employ a firing squad regardless of the prisoner's choice.
The last prisoner to be executed by firing squad in the state was Ronnie Lee Gardner in 2010.
While Utah may be the only state condoning the use of this method, other states are also looking into different means of execution. Last year, Tennessee became the first state in the US to authorize death via electric chair in the absence of lethal injection drugs, though the law faces a legal challenge from inmates who argue the method is unconstitutional.
Meanwhile, lawmakers in Oklahoma are considering a bill that would allow gas chambers to be used in executions.The Supreme Court is currently reviewing the state's lethal injection formula to determine whether it violates the Eighth Amendment's protection against cruel and unusual punishment, since the state had a number of botched executions.
Reader Comments
IMO, the main issue is not so much with the manner of execution, but the integrity of the legal processes getting to that point. Every day we can read about how corrupt the US legal and "justice" systems have become.
Also, traditionally, one or more of the rifles contain blanks and they are given to the members of the execution team without either the shooters or anyone else knowing who has the blanks in their weapons. In theory, there is then no way for anyone to positively identify which of the shooters actually fired the killing shot(s). (In theory only, because an experienced shooter can tell whether he fired a blank or a live round.)
It's like people who want to eat mean but "wouldn't kill an animal".
Firing squads were originally a military phenomenon, and the members were not professional executioners, but regular soldiers picked from the ranks of a unit who were required (under threat of death themselves if they refused) to shoot other soldiers who they may well have known before. Providing blanks theoretically gave each of these non-professional executioners plausible deniability that they in fact were responsible for the death of their erstwhile comrades. That tradition has apparently survived the transition from non-professional to professional executioners.
For what it's worth, similar methods have frequently been used for other types of executions. For example, for gas chambers, electric chairs, lethal injections, etc., there are frequently multiple actuators for dropping the gas generating pellets, energizing the relays, starting the poison flow, etc., one or more of which are configured as "dummy actuators". Each actuator is actuated by a separate individual, and none of them knows whether their device was the one that actually precipitated the execution of the prisoner.
I agree that it's somewhat hypocritical, but I guess TPTB think that it's necessary to provide some level of plausible deniability to the participants, even though they agree to be professional executioners.






Comment: Yep, 'American exceptionalism' strikes again.