OF THE
TIMES
One of my most favourite memories of living in the UK as a child was listening to Brass Bands. I lived in the North of England and they were...
My view is that all sides of these war conflicts are controlled by the globalists. Iran has been under their control since the Shah was disposed...
Hyundai has had this implemented as well.
For decades, after WW2 suspicious activity over Canadian air space has been a controversial area, with lots of tin foil hat speculation regarding...
Tragic and very sad. I hope someone can find out what caused it - was it underwater sonar, or other noises that distrurb the whales or something...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
I've been noticing that the actual magnitude of the quake along with part that reports damage or injuries( or should i say the lack thereof dominantly) being in bold more recently. I am guessing the former is due to a) bring more awareness of the quakes and their strength to peoples mind or b) that the actual strength may be off in calculation, and the latter is a) allegedly acurate as of now but may be different as things continue to "heat up" or b) are as well inacurate and that information pertaining to destruction/injuries are being potentially covered up to contain proper information getting out to the public. Can the editors please clearify for me
Thanks,
Bobby