OF THE
TIMES
Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.
Does anyone else see the contradiction present in the following paragraph: Trump's view of mediation is clear: pressure both sides into agreeing...
It's month end, year end and dividend season. 3 reasons not to end the war.
the team concluded that digging deeper always brings the truth to light. well, maybe. or maybe the deeper one digs - the closer to Chy-nah one...
A bought and paid for medal at that!
"For the first time in decades, Washington and Moscow are engaging as equals," Do the players feel equal? I'm not sure about that.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2025 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Wonder how they identified her and if surveillance video played a part?