• The brain-gut connection - Traditional Chinese Medicine has known this for centuries
• A gut check for many ailments
• Gut Microbes Battle a Common Set of Viruses Shared by Global Populations
• Chronic illness begins in the gut

• Suspend all COVID-19 mRNA vaccines until side-effects are fully investigated, says leading doctor who promoted them on TV
• New study reveals trace amounts of COVID vaccine mRNAs found in breast milk
• Terrifying: Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people
• ICAN obtains court order demanding CDC release secret COVID vaccine adverse events data obtained in 'V-Safe' program
• Children's Health Defense exposes vaccine secrets
• Covid vaccine destroys natural immunity, NEJM study shows
• Vaccine narrative collapses as Harvard study shows jab more dangerous than COVID

• Objective:Health - Meat and Mood - Does Red Meat Consumption Really Lead to Depression?
• Jordan Peterson and daughter Mikhaila are ruffling feathers promoting all-meat diet as cure for autoimmune diseases and depression
• A balanced diet including meat can help alleviate depression in vegetarians
• Vegetarians twice as likely to suffer from depression as meat eaters
• Kelly Brogan: Red meat for your depression
• Red meat halves risk of depression

In a recent interview with GB news, Dr. Malhotra goes on to say:

"When the vaccines were first released we were told they were 95% effective against infection.

This is not true. This is based on relative risk reduction. In absolute terms, they provided 0.84 percent protection which means only one in 119 people would be protected from infection.

This statistic was the pretense under which vaccine mandates were implemented.

"The latest data reveals that once infected there is no significant difference in transmission rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, which makes any scientific case for mandates illegitimate.

As newer and thankfully, less lethal, mutated strains became dominant, any protection against infection at the very least became less effective and likely completely ineffective, even if there is some significant (as yet to be fully determined in absolute individual terms) protection against serious illness and death."

Precisely as was described in the video from the Canadian COVID care alliance which I cross posted resulting in my being deplatformed from Twitter.

The Canadian COVID care alliance has since developed additional videos which make this same point- the SARS-CoV-2 genetic vaccines are neither safe nor effective, and must be stopped. Please see the Canadian COVID care alliance webpage for links.
...

On a personal note... Dr. Malhotra's realization that his father had just been vaccinated just prior to his cardiac arrest and death led him down the path of discovery. Being a good scientist means looking past the propaganda and delving into the research. Sometimes, it takes a wake-up call but thank goodness, at least one great physician listened to the evidence.

In August, Dr Aseem Malhotra wrote an open letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson and US President Joe Biden calling for the immediate release of the raw data from Pfizer's original Covid-19 vaccine trial.

• Dr Aseem Malhotra: It's time to have an honest conversation about the risks of excess weight
• Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Lifestyle tips to hedge against respiratory illness
• Dr. Aseem Malhotra: We need a Parliamentary inquiry to push for the raw data on statins and their effects
• Coconut oil is poison? Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra slams Harvard professor who made the ludicrous claim: 'unscientific nonsense'
• Dr Aseem Malhotra: Sugar is the Real Problem, Not Fat
• Outspoken cardiologist: Dr. Aseem Malhotra sets the record straight on saturated fats
• My mother's vegetarian diet contributed to her early death. We should all learn from it
• The threat of modern medicine: Most patients will derive no health improvement from medication
• Ignorance is not bliss: We need more empowered patients making informed health decisions

1. Vaccine mRNA is confirmed to be present in breastmilk, particularly in the first 48 hours post-dosing.
2. We don't know if that mRNA is active.
3. We do know that vaccine mRNA is distributed to all organ systems (from rat studies).
4. We don't know the functional consequences, bioaccumulation, etc.

BUT WE KNOW IT IS SAFE! UNBELIEVABLE!

There have been reports of breastfed babies dying after their mother's were vaccinated! Now we have a confirmed mechanism! Active vaccine components pass through breast milk!

Discussed by Igor Chudov! Thank you Igor for bringing this letter to my attention!

If vaccine mRNA components pass through breastmilk, do the spike proteins subsequently generated from those vaccine components also pass through breastmilk? With what consequences?

Remember how we said that vaccine shedding is a real thing and breastfeeding after vaccination is dangerous? Our warnings were dismissed as "misinformation" and we were cast as ignorant, science-denying cranks.

Well, now the Journal of American Medical Association published a letter (archive link) that proved conclusively that mRNA vaccine shedding is real! The vaccine mRNA is indeed shed in breast milk and is affecting babies that receive said milk.

This letter provides lab results proving that concerns of the so-called "antivaxxers" were fully justified!

The JAMA letter is quite simple. Scientists picked 11 lactating women, who received Pfizer (6 women) or Moderna (5 women) vaccines during lactation.

After vaccination, breast milk was analyzed for the presence of mRNA nanoparticles. Not surprisingly, 7 samples were POSITIVE for the presence of mRNA.

The authors also point out that the promises of mRNA vaccines that "vaccine stays in the shoulder" were lies. The vaccine traveled to the breasts and was transferred into breast milk.

These data demonstrate for the first time to our knowledge the biodistribution of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to mammary cells and the potential ability of tissue EVs to package the vaccine mRNA that can be transported to distant cells.

Little has been reported on lipid nanoparticle biodistribution and localization in human tissues after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

Despite that, the authors say the following, possibly to get their letter past the JAMA censors:

The sporadic presence and trace quantities of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA detected in EBM suggest that breastfeeding after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is safe, particularly beyond 48 hours after vaccination.

Your first reading of the above sentence might suggest that the authors said "COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is safe". But it is ominously qualified with "particularly beyond 48 hours after vaccination", plainly meaning that breastfeeding within 48 hours after vaccination is NOT safe.

It is sad that researchers have to say things (it is safe and effective) that contradict the plain meaning of this article (women shed mRNA nanoparticles on their infants). Our friend Modern Discontent recently posted a great guide to reading scientific papers, where he also lamented how article conclusions often contradict article data. This article is a perfect example of that, and there is plenty more of such examples in the Covid world.

This is why paying attention to what the article says, beyond platitudes, is paramount.

Wildly Differing Concentrations of mRNA make it MORE Dangerous

Look at this chart showing concentrations of mRNA in milk. The worst concentration was EIGHT TIMES the lowest concentration. This means that likely, in a larger sample of women, the disparity between highest and lowest values would be even greater.

What is the deadly concentration of mRNA that could cause the death of an infant in the Pfizer trial (see below)? Nobody knows and the FDA does not care.

The detection limit (per supplement) was 1 pg/mL. What if levels just below 1 pg/mL could be harmful? We have no idea.

Dead Infant

Confidential Pfizer documents, which the FDA wanted to hide from us for 75 years, show a case of an infant, possibly killed by mRNA nanoparticles shed by a recently vaccinated mother.

The "neonatal death" and numerous other neonatal problems in infants exposed to vaccinated mothers' breast milk are discussed in my article here.

Astute reader ChrisCoonsToupee located the VAERS entry for this dead infant.

They Lied to Us

Remember how we were assured that "vaccines are safe for mothers"?

Turned out that not only they were NOT safe, but also that the fact-checkers and authorities outright lied about safety, since they studiously avoided collecting any data that would confirm it! They also IGNORED Pfizer's own reports of 17 neonatal problems and wanted to hide that for 75 years.

Now we know WHAT they wanted to hide.

They could have done this simple study two years ago. But they did not even bother to conduct such a trivial check! Why?