Most of us hold opinions that 70 years ago would have placed us to the left of the Overton window
© Global Look PressJordan Peterson
In February last year,
Spectator Life ran an article by Douglas Murray on the arrival of a new group of unorthodox thinkers who were
challenging the dogmas of the authoritarian left. People who maintained, among other things, that there are fundamental biological differences between men and women, that free speech is under siege on campus and elsewhere, and that some aspects of western civilization — in particular, the values of the Enlightenment — are worth defending.
Murray's list included Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Sam Harris, Christina Hoff Sommers: all members of what they jokingly referred to as the 'intellectual dark web' (IDW). When the
New York Times's Bari Weiss used the same moniker in an
article about these thinkers a few months later, it entered the mainstream lexicon. The IDW went global.
Needless to say, this oddball collection of writers and broadcasters were immediately dismissed by the defenders of progressive orthodoxy as beyond the pale. A piece in the
Guardian described the IDW as 'the thinking wing of the alt-right'. Other left-wing commentators have said much the same, pointing out that most of its members are middle-aged white men — proof, apparently, that they want to withhold power from women and minorities. Peterson's defense of the patriarchy is often cited as Exhibit A in the case for the prosecution.
Comment: The locals want U.S. troops out. Not only are they a nuisance, they're a criminal threat: U.S. troops regularly rape local women, for example. It's no wonder Japanese aren't the only ones who want them to just go home: