SOTT Focus:

NewsReal: Neutralize Tucker! Berserker Reactions to Carlson-Fuentes Interview

Sott.net
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 10:04 UTC

His surprise appearance on Tucker Carlson's show is something of a 'marker event' in the meteoric rise of polemic right-wing commentator Nicholas Fuentes to American political prominence. In the end it was a civil conversation fleshing out background to his controversial takes, and general agreement on what's been taking place in the US recently: growing, significant public backlash against Israel's wars and outsized influence in American politics. So, what pretty much everyone's talking about!

But, for some reason, THESE TWO PEOPLE are apparently 'strictly verboten' from being allowed to meet, much less discuss the 'elephant in the room'. The 'guilty flee where none doth pursue', so the extreme - and childishly inane - reactions of mainstream pundits and politicians betray a sense of 'doom' on their part regarding this 'culture war' shift in the USA. How will 'the enforcers' respond? In their customary manner? Or do their regular tactics no longer work?

Running Time: 02:04:27

Download: MP3 — 114 MB

This podcast is also available to view, share and download on Odysee, Rumble, X and VK.

Show Notes

Reader Comments

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-03T21:42:18Z

I don't think it is a "Catholic" thing, but I do think the catholic way of thinking has merit.

So - God Bless Tucker and Candace I reckon - keep speaking truth - speak your minds - what is there to lose?

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-03T22:47:11Z

Oh gracious - going back an episode or two the evidence keeps piling in:

[Link]
[Link]
~

There comes a time when it is time to secede from ideas proven worthless -

better ideas beckon.

~

That ain't "catholic" nor it is "anti-sematic" tis just rationale to realize the obvious - and now here we are.

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-05T01:07:28Z

I really appreciate the "ai" sometimes - cause I basically can't argue with this - even though I love a good argument:

~

The Catholic way of thinking is described as a mindset, an attitude of the heart, and a set of insights, presumptions, priorities, and directions derived from faith. It is not merely about knowing Catholic teachings but involves a deeper, lived commitment that influences how one views God, the world, life, suffering, sin, family, society, happiness, knowledge, and human existence. This way of thinking is rooted in the belief that faith is not just intellectual assent but a response to reality as it truly is, involving deep convictions and a willingness to give oneself to God’s plan.

A central feature of this mindset is the sacramental principle, which sees the divine presence and grace in the ordinary aspects of creation, recognizing that "there is always 'more than meets the eye'". This encourages a rigorous examination of reality, seeking to understand both what is and why it is, integrating reason and faith. The Catholic intellectual tradition emphasizes that faith and reason are not opposed but complementary, with faith providing the "why" behind the "what" that reason discovers.

Thinking Catholic also involves a commitment to lifelong learning, reflection, and prayer. It requires consciously looking for God in all aspects of life—successes, failures, joys, and sorrows—and responding to His call in one’s specific circumstances. This includes cultivating gratitude, nourishing one’s spiritual life through Scripture, the sacraments, and community, and developing habits of mindfulness and prayer.

A distinctive characteristic of Catholic thinking is its "both and" approach, which embraces paradoxes and tensions rather than reducing complex truths to simplistic binaries. For example, the Church teaches that Jesus is both fully divine and fully human, not one or the other. This way of thinking resists the polarization common in modern culture and seeks truth wherever it can be found, rather than aligning with a single political or ideological camp.

The Catholic way of thinking is also deeply communal. It involves thinking with the Church, as expressed in the principle of sentire cum Ecclesia —to think and feel with the Church. The Church is seen not as a barrier to thought but as a source of wisdom and a "great storehouse of thinking" that enables deeper, more profound reflection. It provides the resources to ask the most important questions and to engage with the mysteries of faith, which are not unknowable black holes but rich, inexhaustible realities to be pondered throughout a lifetime.

Ultimately, the Catholic way of thinking is about living in alignment with God’s will, subordinating personal desires to the teachings of the Church and the will of God, and seeing all of life as part of a divine plan centered on the salvation of souls. It is a way of being that fosters sanity and faithfulness in a world that often promotes selfishness, immediate gratification, and a denial of deeper meaning.

I sure hope those who killed Charlie Kirk get identified and rooted out.

As for subsuming oneself to the "Church" I disagree wholeheartedly, but I was raised Catholic but I ain't no more - I don't think the Pope is infallible, but I appreciate the catholic way of thinking as well as the nuns who drilled it into me.

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-05T01:15:59Z

Buffalo_Ken - I suspect as it has been reported, Charlie Kirk was also starting to think in this manner - but the thing is - if you accept funds, then you must realize - even if you think it is "non-profit" - no Jew gives you funds without strings attached. Lets be real - shall we.

I hope those who murdered Charlie Kirk get rooted out - even if it means many institutions many hold onto fondly have to be disassembled being they are part of corruption runs so deep - full of mammon and worthless and contrary to what the Founders tried to set in place.

So God Bless Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens - they are fearless and we need more like them.

God Bless the Founders - they had good ideas.

God Bless the ideas they had.

There is no way to stifle long-term a good idea - can't be done.

God Bless those fearless enough to speak truth to power.

~

Better ideas beckon.

Eventide · 2025-11-06T15:26:23Z

Buffalo_Ken

Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens - they are fearless and we need more like them.

I found the interview between Carlson and Fuentes to be sad. Carlson is going to lecture Fuentes into pulling himself by his own bootstraps out of being a self-involved authoritarian twit? Really? It is concerning that Fuentes has a grip on the hearts and minds of immature men, but hopefully their fascination will be a stage most will grow out of. Meanwhile, it appears to me that Fuentes' overwrought nervous system is his own worst enemy. I predict that he'll soon suffer serious health issues, if he isn't already. His is a classic case of nervous system development that was probably premature, and outpaced other aspects of his development. He's a highly unbalanced individual.

As far as Owens is concerned, is anybody noticing that the same degree and style of emotionality was evidenced with regard to the "Brigitte is a man" assertion as is being shown in the "I'm Charlie's champion" gig? She'd be convincing if there was any nuance to her response to either of these situations. It's like she's an outrage robot. Why was she so committed to exposing Macron, and then dropped that like a hot potato as soon as the Kirk assassination happened? Why is she asserting that there was a "shooter," when the evidence strongly suggests there wasn't? I'm left wondering if she was one of Kirk's handlers - like his wife, and several of his "team."

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-06T15:27:01Z

Eventide - I haven't watched the video and not sure I will....it seems to have caused a stir however.

As for the courage of Candace - you got your view and I got mine - is that ok with you? Lets just leave it at that - but in my mind she is courageous and willing to take the risk of speaking truth to power. I'll add that I don't spend a lot of "effort" trying to understand any supposed "underlying agendas" - what matters to me is if what is communicated resonates or not.

Regards,

BK

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-06T15:33:26Z

Eventide - now of course if actions contradict what is spoken, then that is part of the calculus - but otherwise trying to understand "underlying agendas" is a waste of time in my book and more often than not full of bias of the one projecting out their sense of the "agenda" of another.

Eventide · 2025-11-07T01:49:27Z

Buffalo_Ken trying to understand "underlying agendas" is a waste of time in my book

Who are you quoting saying anything about "underlying agendas?"

Your personal reactivity to the reasons I cite for my concerns, as if my statements constitute some sort of judgement of you, is weird and inappropriate.

you got your view and I got mine - is that ok with you?

I'm not at any point telling you what to think. I'm telling you what I think, and citing reasons why I think it. If you have an emotional bias at the foundation of what you think, that's something that may or may not be a problem for you. But can you please just say and defend what you believe or think without assuming this passive/aggressive gaslighting behavior? It's tiresome and completely uncalled for. You are gaslighting when you are assuming an aggressive/defensive posture in order to shut someone up. Sometimes I'm honestly sympathetic to the women in your life, because you seem to be utterly unconscious of these tendencies.

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-07T20:43:56Z

Eventide - I'm not trying to shut anybody up. But you cast doubts upon both Candace Owen and Tucker Carlson often and I disagree with what you are expressing regarding them and it is as simple as that. I don't know either Candace nor Tucker directly, but what they express resonates with me - so I support their views. It is possible they do have some "underlying agenda", but I consider that speculation and lately seems to me they have been consistent in expression. I think they deserve appreciation for their courage.

~

Why do you often resort to psychoanalyzing posts? I don't know you either - I don't presume to analyze you but I do think in an open forum such as this it is of value to present counter-views - and that is that.

~

As for the " women in my life " - the fact you feel the need to mention that seems odd to me - as if you have any bearing on that whatsoever....cause let me inform you - you don't. In fact, when it comes to that sort of projection you are tiresome and completely uncalled for - you don't know - how dare you imply that you are the "spokesperson" for the female mindset - that is over the top.

Good day.

BK

Eventide · 2025-11-07T21:01:24Z

Buffalo_Ken

in an open forum such as this it is of value to present counter-views

Absolutely. That's what is happening. No reason to be reactive, right? You don't pull this kind of shit with men in comment threads (I haven't seen it, at least). If you are reactive to what I post, I WILL call you out on it, because it IS an attempt to denigrate what I'm saying. It's not OK, so just stop it.

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-07T21:04:38Z

Eventide - good lord - you are incorrigible sometimes - you always think everything has to do with "women" somehow - why?

Don't go accusing me of sexist bias - you the one for whom this seems to be the "paramount" issue - it shades everything you express I have noticed. Strictly speaking I have never met you and I don't even know your sex! I don't want to know - I don't care.

Of course gender issues affect our everyday lives no doubt - but you seem to think you are the "spokesperson" for all the ladies - I mean for heaven's sake - get over it - cause you ain't in my book.

BK

Eventide · 2025-11-07T21:07:28Z

Buffalo_Ken

Don't go accusing me of sexist bias - you the one for whom this seems to be the "paramount" issue - it shades everything you express I have noticed

Yeah, right. You certainly don't need to agree. Just be respectful and not reactive. That's all I'm asking.

TBoris · 2025-11-06T14:32:25Z

I watched the Tucker interview. To me the America First Party (who Fuentes represents and who he thought MAGA/Trump should be) doesn't want a "chosen people" (the "revisionist zionists" https://www.voltairenet.org/article223061.html), who are international, and put themselves ahead of all national interest, to be considered something that can not be talked about . Tucker said that all people are equal under the new testament(assuming the old is thrown out) and kinda pushed back on Fuentes who felt that having racial identity (like whites) is okay and shouldn't be just not talked about (like Jewish identity isn't allowed).

I thought the conservative discussion about the sexes was very interesting. Especially the part about men being seen(by women these days) as having all the responsibility but none of the authority(i.e. "I married my best friend" instead of I married my husband as his wife). It could explain why women might not have much respect for men these days as "men"(I think).

Also(related), was the mention of autogynephilia [Link] causing males watching sex porn and leading to Transgenderism M to F. basically from from men watching women have sex (and putting themselves in the porn "as the women") and then deciding to change "themselves" into what they desire.

To me (going back to the NewsReal) Protestant Christians (especially prone are evangelists) sometimes replace "God" in the new testament with Yahweh(from the old).

So then you have:

The Father ==> The Son ==> The Holy Spirit

Transformed in the the Zionists mind - not the "revisionist zionists" see link above that caused this to happen(plus killing off all the Cathars):

The Yahweh => The Begotten Son (Still ~~Jesus~~ Yahweh) ==> The spirit of the angry and Jealous God

So something is messed up there for some folks in their heads (I think)...And I blame the Gospel of John as being deceptive there.

Now personally I think (and it is really out there I know for some folks ) that the correct trinity is(IMO):

The Mind of God => The Holy Human Spirt => The Creation(which includes both live and dead bodies in caves or otherwise)

Buffalo_Ken · 2025-11-06T20:41:47Z

TBoris - the whole concept of "America First" tis full of fallacies and theatrics even the Founders would concur - most of em.

So taking that at face value, I could give a crap about Nick Fuentes and his interview with Tucker Carlson - I don't intend on watching it - the die has been cast.

May the best ideas prevail - and for those think the best ideas come out of interviews twixt one narrative versus the other - they got another thing coming - cause Mother Nature suffers no fools Boris.

~

The founders were never "declaring" -

America First

Rather they were exclaiming - "we don't need to suffer tyrants"....

~

So there is a big difference twixt the two - and some of us know that already....

~

To bring this to conclusion - if the current day folks out of "dc" have become tyrants - then just look up the council of the "Founders" as to what ought be the necessary response to that - "no thanks" - I'll just take care of myself I reckon.

~

And that is the basis of America from the Founders - and while better ideas beckon - many of them - have already been expressed - tis just they got "compromised" by some who think they are "pre-destined" to be in positions of authority - oh how wrong they are - and this is PROVEN already.

Eventide · 2025-11-07T02:11:43Z

TBoris "I married my best friend" instead of I married my husband as his wife). It could explain why women might not have much respect for men these days as "men"(I think).

Respect doesn't result from acceptance of a subordinate role, I don't think. It used to be that the roles of married couples were more clearly defined. Ideally, the woman was respected in her domain, and the man in his. In our current world, couples can find themselves competing for dominance within the same context, and that usually doesn't work well. So to make a marriage work, people usually have to either become partners, (having a relationship based on trust and mutual support - "best friends"), or develop role differentiations that work in their particular circumstance (and are subject to change as life circumstances change).

I don't think that relationships founded on expectations of subordination really work any longer in most circumstances.

TBoris · 2025-11-08T02:54:29Z

Eventide

I don't think that relationships founded on expectations of subordination really work any longer in most circumstances.

I agree. Especially since social engineering (Technocracy) is ultimately to have no marriages/partnerships or families.

Eventide · 2025-11-08T21:49:37Z

TBoris

I agree. Especially since social engineering (Technocracy) is ultimately to have no marriages/partnerships or families.

It's true that technocracy is working to destroy any social unit (including the family) where they are threatened with competition for the role of Big Daddy whose Will is Law - and the destruction will be total if they get their way. We may all soon get to see how we like having no voice with regard to our fate. But this doesn't have anything to do with whether or not men are the final authority within a family. That just creates an unhappy family, in my experience. No human being is wise or knowledgeable enough to have that level of command over others. Even Wally and June Cleaver had that figured out. Come to think of it, we look at Leave It To Beaver as being a silly relic of the 1950s, but in a lot of ways, it exemplified fatherly behavior that was founded in love, mutual support, and wise guidance rather than authoritarianism. Ditto with Father Knows Best, and Andy Griffith. It's interesting to think of those shows being forward-thinking rather than just silly, idyllic portraits of a kind of family and community life that didn't really exist.

TBoris · 2025-11-08T23:13:29Z

Eventide

But this doesn't have anything to do with whether or not men are the final authority within a family.

I don't have an opinion on that other than in my experience it depends on who the husband and wife are. Not so much them being a man or a woman. Even back in the 50s I seriously doubt a one size fits all "the man is the final authority" would work much(so I agree). Here is where we get into cultural norms and morals and who creates that. Because from that, are the "polite" societies(communities) formed that are to mirror those idyllic portraits within acceptable Overton windows.

No human being is wise or knowledgeable enough to have that level of command over others.

Not individuals by themselves I agree. This is though where that movie from Truth Stream media comes in: 'The Minds of Men | Official Documentary by Aaron & Melissa Dykes' [Link]
Technocracy is all about "social engineering" (controlling human behavior) so they are continuing on their plans...

IT'S WORSE Than You Think [Link]

SADIWAH

People like Randi Weingarten who style themselves as champions of education are really there to launder union dues for political corruption. She,...

Eventide

The Iran war is not about nuclear weapons. It’s about a Trade Corridor . [Link]

SADIWAH

Chicago just slid further into decay. As with the usa

Giant Meteor 24

DMSO: Nature’s Healing Solvent (full book)100,000 Studies. Zero deaths. One approval. by Robert Yoho, MD Jun 06, 2026 [Link]

parzival

SOTT Focus:

NewsReal: Neutralize Tucker! Berserker Reactions to Carlson-Fuentes Interview

Reader Comments

Latest News

Picture of the Day

Quote of the Day

Recent Comments

Quantum Quirk