© The Post Millenial
Greenberg was found deceased in the Manayunk apartment she shared with her fiance Sam Goldberg, and the wounds were ruled to have been self-inflicted. A kitchen knife with a 10-inch blade was found sticking out of her chest.
Greenberg's parents have fought for 14 years to have their daughter's death reexamined and after the case was reopened, "Philadelphia's Chief Medical Examiner Lindsay Simon announced she is standing by the city's controversial ruling," The Daily Mail reports.
Simon claims that because there were no signs of struggle or defensive wounds, Greenberg could have stabbed herself 20 times. "While the distribution of injuries is admittedly unusual, the fact remains that Ellen would be capable of inflicting these injuries herself," Simon said.
She said that there were hesitation wounds and that Greenberg was not "incapacitated" when she suffered the wounds. Simon also said there was no domestic abuse in Greenberg and Goldberg's home and there was no other DNA than Greenberg's on the knife.
Simon cited Greenberg's anxiety, her new insomnia meds that led to "an increase in energy to act on her anxious thoughts." This led Simon to write that "With all of this information considered, it is the opinion of the undersigned that the manner of Ellen Greenberg's death is best classified as 'suicide.'"
This is despite multiple independent assessments from experts who have asserted that her body was moved, that one of the wounds was inflicted after her death, and that the discovery of her body, as was attested to by Goldberg, did not happen in the way that he said it did.
In February 2025, the pathologist who undertook her autopsy back in 2011 reversed course and said that now he does not believe Greenberg stabbed herself 20 times.
Attorney for Greenberg's parents Joe Podraza said that the report was an "embarrassment to the City, and an insult to Ellen and her family."
"It includes false claims - like the assertion that a stab wound in Ellen's spinal column was made during autopsy, a theory rejected by every credible expert, including the City's own neuropathologist," he said.
"By ignoring key evidence that contradicts suicide — the extensive 3D photogrammetry, a recreation which proves Ellen could not self-inflict all of the wounds, unexplained bruises, missing surveillance footage, an intact lock, accounts of a toxic relationship, etc.," he went on to say. "Simon builds a flimsy case on distorted portrayals of Ellen's mental health, propped up by cynical distortions of Ellen's managed anxiety, a condition widely experienced daily by over 40 million Americans. Shame on you Simon."
Reader Comments
Biomechanically. Interesting word. Says it all. I am certain to be taller than the stabbed lady and there is NO WAY I could stab myself according to the depiction we see in the article. Biomechanically impossible.
Lots of stretched strings there.
I will never put ANYTHING out of the realms of possibility when it comes to a kike and their possible shekels.
This being said, I can thoroughly believe that a kikess can in fact stab herself in the back 20 times and one through the khazar milkers. The lure of free insurance shekels is too great.
No doubt about it.
The truth usually hurts BUT
It is always fact and few can HANDLE THE TRUTH
To "Could care less" means you care some, maybe even a lot. "Couldn't care less" means you absolutely do not care.
But don't worry, many makes that same mistake.
Why are you so darn mean?
I have faith that you can think instead of just reacting. Show me that I'm right.
lol.
courtesy of AI: Hypocrisy is when someone says one thing but does the opposite, or when their actions don't match their stated beliefs or values. It's pretending to have beliefs or virtues you don't actually have.
Thinking takes energy that I'm not willing to waste on grumpy old men.
And the meaning, as you note, involves perceiving a difference between what someone does (which you have no way of knowing) and what they say.
On top of that, you think I'm a "grumpy old man" and I'm a woman!
Three strikes you're out, girlfriend. I suggest you limit comments to ones that contribute to the discussion. Around here, mindless derogatory blather doesn't work as well as it might on social media.
you don't see bigotry in yourself?
I'm not here to argue with you, but ma'am, you verbally attacked someone for expressing their opinion about an article. Someone who didn't directly address you, but for what ever reason, you took it personal and launched an attack against said person. It made you look like a troll...a very ugly troll. You were the aggressor.
Maybe there's lingering animosity from past encounters, I dont know. I don't visit SOTT very often, but when I do, I usually read the comments before I read the article, because [usually] the comments are civil and intelligent here, and if interesting enough, I'll then read the article.
now days, it's new and different people who comments, makes me think that the comment section has become volatile and the long time, older ones who use to share their opinions and insights have stopped commenting.
so you callout bigotry, I call out hypocrisy. And I hate hate.
I said what I think about bigoted speech. It's not OK, it's not ever going to be OK, and I won't be shut up with verbiage that you don't bother to even try to understand before you start spraying it around trying to intimidate people into silence. That doesn't work here. That belongs on X or Facebook, not a place where people try to be thoughtful about what they say.
You claim to "hate hate," but defend the most hateful form of speech there is.
And Revelation 3:9
Maybe they are talking about the fake jews?
The attitude you express has to change - and it will change - but not before a lot more suffering happens. I bless the suffering, because it's only through suffering that people grow beyond their myopic perspectives and lazy thinking.
Lazy thinking? Lol. More hypocrisy.
read Deuteronomy 14:21then tell me why anyone would defend a self-proclaimed people of God's own chosen ones (LOLOL)...but that's not all...but hey, I'm a lazy thinker who is blinded by LIES, NOT.
I look at both the Jewish and Islamic religions as anachronistic. They're like the Hatfields and McCoys. I've said for a long time that the world should divest them of their modern war toys, build a fence around the lot of them, and let them throw rocks and spears at each other until they can figure out how to advance their archaic religions and silly self-importance to a point where they can join the modern world.
The bible is a Jewish hoax, but in order to know truths, you must first be exposed to the lies. As long as antisemitism remains a definable word in our vocabulary, and reiterated by those who take offense to it, the lie continues to be perpetuated.
Although I am a spiritual person, I do question the existence of a god, but I wholeheartedly believe there was a man named Jesus who tried to expose the lies; Jewish lies. Lies that has shaped our world for what it is today. Lies that were, and still is, being force fed to us.
It's just normal jewish justice.
Move along people, nothing to see here.
Just sayin. One has to ask when faced with such a blatant cover-up attempt.
And bigots, I'd appreciate it if you could refrain from jumping in with ugly comments. I'm talking about the educated and privileged of any frickin' race, nationality, or religious persuasion.
Is this murderous behaviour inherent within this religious cult that occupys Palestine? This genocide seems to enjoy lots of support from the people in isreal and america. Looking at the slaughter, i wonder how that could possibly be.
Also, why is it mostly the jewish community who hold dual passports under false names?
The jewish lobby, over the decades since their last big lie, has sought to stigmatise and ruin the lives of those who question the narrative. This zionist lobby play whack-a-mole with writers and historians.
I wonder how this story became so prevalent. Were inspectors surreptitiously doing this on request? Was it an unofficial practice? Was there some kind of stigma attached to doing that yourself and it was more acceptable to say an official did it? Don't know.
Best of the Web: Suicided? OpenAI whistleblower found dead in San Francisco apartment
Suchir Balaji, 26, claimed the company broke copyright law. A former OpenAI researcher known for whistleblowing the blockbuster artificial intelligence company facing a swell of lawsuits over its...I have seen some videos discussing this case, and if something similar happened here, a murder could be written off as a suicide - against evidence. Perhaps, when enough power is involved some medical examiners perfer to keep their jobs.