In his recent Valdai speech, President Vladimir Putin declared that the age of a single model for all has ended, and that
nations now moor themselves in their own traditions, drawing strength from culture, faith, and history. Across the globe, ancestral values are reawakening as globalism and cultural imperialism are receding. The world is witnessing a rising concert of sovereign civilizations.
Putin spoke with clarity about the condition of the world. He stated that there is no shared agreement on how the international order should be structured. Mankind has begun a long era of searching. The path forward will be marked by trial and error, by turbulence and storms. No blueprint exists. No authority dictates the outcome. We live in open history, raw and uncertain.
Yet amidst this chaos, Putin said, nations must hold on to anchors. They cannot drift with the currents of instability. The true anchor lies in culture, in the ethical and religious values that have ripened through centuries, in geography, and in the space each civilization inhabits. These form the compass of identity. They provide the foundations on which nations can build a steady life, even as winds howl and waves rise.
Traditions are at the heart of this compass. Each nation possesses its own. Each tradition is unique, shaped by its land and history. Respect for these traditions, Putin said, is the first law of order among peoples. Attempts to force a single model upon the world have always failed. The Soviet Union tried to impose its system. The United States then took up the baton. Europe joined shortly after. Each failed. What is artificial cannot last. What grows from outside roots will wither. Only what is born from within endures. Those who honor their own heritage rarely trample upon the heritage of others.
Putin's message is multipolar.
Each people must return to its foundations and draw strength from within. Each nation must define its own path, rooted in its own culture. This is the end of uniformity, the end of a single model for all. Across the world, we see it now. The Global South turns to its own heritage. Even in the West, patriotic fragments of society search for their forgotten roots. When nations focus on their own growth, they find it easier to deal with others as equals.
Putin gave a clear indication of renewal within Russia. He told of young women who now step into bars and clubs in
sarafans and
kokoshnik headdresses, the dress of their ancestors. This is no costume trick. It demonstrates that Western attempts to corrupt Russian society have failed. What was meant to weaken the spirit has instead roused it. The old costume now enters the modern street as a symbol of defiance and pride. Tradition, far from being buried, returns with greater strength, and the youth themselves carry it forward.
The same current flows across the globe. In China, the
hanfu movement is gathering pace, with young people proudly wearing the robes of dynasties past on city streets and at public festivals. In Latin America, indigenous culture is experiencing a resurgence of strength. Quechua in Peru is taught again through bilingual schools and broadcast on radio and television, while indigenous music, art, and symbols are making a comeback as markers of pride and historical continuity. Across Africa, drumming and ritual, once pushed into the shadows during colonial rule, are brought again into the light. UNESCO now recognizes traditions such as the Royal Drummers of Burundi and Senegal's
sabar drumming as treasures of mankind, symbols of a continent reclaiming its ancestral voice.
These revivals are not curiosities. They show that tradition is alive everywhere, a force that resists the steamrollers of globalism and restores dignity to peoples once told to forget their roots.In the United States under Donald Trump, we see the same impulse: a turn from empty liberal dogmas towards roots, identity, and history. The 1776 Commission, reborn under his leadership, is restoring patriotic education and reclaiming the narrative of America's founding from distorted ideology. Trump is issuing executive orders to reshape how national symbols, monuments, and museums present history, demanding that they not
"inappropriately disparage" past Americans or betray the founding spirit. He is re-elevating faith and national symbols, insisting on a sovereign national narrative, and framing the culture war as one between a people and the elite who would rewrite their memory. It is a shift: the return of a pride in heritage, the reclaiming of stories once handed over to the liberal scholars, and the reassertion that a nation must grow its future from its past, not abandon it.
Traditionalists also exist inside liberal Western Europe. They are not enemies of their societies. Rather, they are the enslaved class within them. Their elites suffocate them with liberal dogma, wield diversity as propaganda, and preach a false morality that demands they accept being displaced by foreigners in their own lands. For these traditionalists, Putin's words carry power. They hear in them a message of hope: that their struggle is part of a wider revolt. They are not alone. They will join hands with others across the world who defend tradition against the machine of globalism and uniformity.
At the heart of this new world stands Russia. Russia is more than a state. It is the ideological center of the emerging order. It offers not a single doctrine for all but a chorus of voices. Putin called this chorus
"political polyphony." In this concert of nations, each voice is distinct, each rooted in its own tradition. Will the United States take part in this chorus? That remains an open question. Yet Putin extended a hand. It is a hand stretched towards Trump, towards those in America who resist the liberal establishment, and towards the West as a whole.
This context sharpens another truth.
Wokeism, born in America, is already exhausted. It is burning itself in its birthplace. Its slogans sound increasingly meaningless even to its former believers. Alongside it, globalism is fading. Its claims of universality are being exposed as fraud. Yet Europe remains trapped. Europe has become the fortress of liberal insanity and racism. It cloaks itself in talk of equality while imposing its anti-values with supreme arrogance. It insists on exporting LGBTQ ideology, transgender experiments, and climate hysteria. These are its banners. Behind them lies contempt for others. This is the new liberal form of white supremacism.
The choice for Europe is stark. It can continue down the road of arrogance, pointlessly trying to push its liberal creed upon the world and collapsing in utter irrelevance. Or it can accept a new role. It can rejoin the concert of civilizations, not as a master but as an equal. It can trade supremacism for dignity, dogma for heritage, and contempt for respect. History has no mercy, but it does offer renewal. Europe must change with the times or sink into emptiness.
The storms ahead will be strong. Yet with firm roots, civilizations endure.
Reader Comments
In the West those true anchors will remain blurred for as long as the non-elected globalists are allowed to dictate their controlling whims.
In the modern age there is no reason whatsoever to have war as an answer. The problems lie within the minds of those who govern. Put a spoiled entitled person in a position of power and compromises are nigh on impossible.
Looking around at the present conflicts. They all seem to involve the stealing of resources, namely oil, which we commoners are told we should not be using.
The Eastern Bloc (and Soviet Union) wanted to create the "communist man" to achieve this goal, in other words, fundamentally change our psychology into their utopian image. And the US / European system wanted to turn us into hyper-tolerant, sexual perverted liberal slaves, trying the same "education" mind trick on us. Man is not a " blank slate" they can remodel as they wish, no matter how hard they try. And there is the spark of God's law (or "natural law") in many of us, an innate ability to differ between good and bad, and right from wrong - beyond man's definition.
Out-of-the-box. The covid-19 vax had multiple formulations as batches, that were experiments on their effects on humans. For example, those early videos of people turning their head like they see something and then falling dead. It is like NAZI scientist Mengele on steroids.
I thought about the whole issue again lately. And still maintain there was no mRNA or nanobots involved, just "plain" toxins. Although toxins of the accumulating and longterm-effective kind (like heavy metals).
As you might have noticed, the vaxx frenzy and push for forced injections stopped shortly after the Ukraine - Russia issue entered it's hot phase. Which is curious, as wars in remote locations don't usually affect pandemics ...
I think the initial plan was to roll the shots out in successive waves over a few years, with either constant or increasing toxicity. This would have given them control over the number of culled commoners. However, the defiance of especially China and Russia in this matter threw a monkey wrench into their works. First, Russia did not collapse economically or militarily, quite the opposite. And second, both mostly relied on their own vaxxes instead the toxic Western sludge. (On a related note, my wife has a Russian friend working in Austria, who wanted to get the Russian shot for her job in healthcare. But no way, no Russian or Chinese vaxx was ever approved here.) I think the "new virus strain" scare and vaxx frenzy would have continued as soon as the BRICS had been 'pacified'.
The gist is, the vaxxed part of the population is most probably not as seriously damaged as initially suspected. We will have to deal with them for the coming years, if not decades. However, the toxins are very difficult to remove or deactivate, causing them significant health issues in the long run.
But the stain on their reputation and their soul is inerasible.
The references to the scamdemic start at around the 5 minute mark.
Can the vaxx damage be undone? Can those that took the vaxx be detoxified? Probably depends on how much damage was done and how many actual boosters they took.
One of the good things, is that the scale of vaccinating millions or billions, means that in the initial vaccination many injections were probably saline. There was probably targeting involved.
Thanks for the link. There is a connection.
Although, a lot of the 'victims' just took the shots because they were either too lazy or too weak to think or decide for themselves. The same applies here, and they will fall back to indoctrinated behavior - run to their doc, which is in most cases the same...
That might sound cynical, but I could back it up with my own experiences. We can only speculate. But yes, I think saline injection were involved. I remember an incident in France, were a whole town "erranously" received Pfizer shots that later turned out to be saline dummies.
I guess especially the first wave consisted of the a large spectrum of toxicity, to "test the waters". Of course separated by region, to get statistically relevant picture.
And I suspect as a fine-tuning in later waves, dangerously high concentrations with conspicious effects were subsequently cancelled, as well as "ineffective" low concentration.
On a related note, it seems the most "politically incorrect" or generally "disliked" groups were targeted to test the high concentration.
However, I know a few good and well-meaning folks were duped. But is still their own responsibility to first acknowledge they have been effed over, and to seek out help.
And the second great leap of faith for them is to abandon the healthcare system, which tried to off them in the first place.
I can be wrong, but I got the impression that other, more real and pressing issues will take precedence.
I've learned to move my troops closer to the line of action and I use the rails to achieve this in this game being seems there is no "charge" for that. Here are some cities being contested (in the "game" mind ya):
1. Safanovo - I've blown the bridges there and am setting a trap for the "ai".
2. Belyy - got a belly full of "core troops" protecting this place in defense.
3. Dorogobuzh - odds are the troops get kicked out of this place but not before some serious damage is done.
4. Yelnya - time to evacuate and sorry for those got posted there.
5. Demensk - I doubt it gets to here but if it does is will be a cauldron full of opposition with nowhere to go and then meanwhile - elsewhere the offensive will commence - all in good time.
~
Tis turn 3 of 60, but I expect the scenario will be over well before Turn #30. And then tis time to go on offense after the Defense of Moscow scenario in Hex of Steel - but a game!
[Link]
[Link]
~
Incidentally - this scenario is after Poland '39, Finland effort, and defense of Leningrad. I'm 4 scenarios in and have a core group of 13.
[Link] - from the link:
My core group defending Belyy in the game include:
1. An SU-14
2. A YaG-10 (29-K)
3. An AT-1 - (I sure hope they come up with something better...
4. A BA-10 - (hard not to like this vulnerable scout)
~
There are some troops already placed in the woods to the south settling in entrenchment defense.
~
Basically after you push back the first assault in this game with defense well placed, then time to go on offensive and bring the scenario to closure. Now lets all acknowledge "ai" doesn't do well on offense, but in defense especially when it has the advantage in purchasing power that can make it difficult. But on offense the "ai" is clueless - I mean all it ought do is waste a bit of funds on sending some paratroopers deep into the territory - and then one would have to account for that possibility - or better yet get some marines do an invasion from the sea - but on this map - deep in the heart of Russia - that ain't going to happen.
~
Now a few more core troops include (and remember this is "1941" in the game - the fall):
1. A Katyusha - gracious me they move fast but they are vulnerable to attack. But they pack an artillery PUNCH.
2. An SMK - a mean ass tank.
3. The Desantniki - paratroopers I say!
4. And of course the "Engineers" - without them you lose the war.
~~~~~
I prefer for all of my core troops to be practiced in the "national ideology" - that gives them a benefit when fighting against others of different thought process ( in the "game" for Christ's sake ).
It is amazing what one can learn playing computer games - but if that is all you do - then you are destined to failure - cause life demands balance - ask any Judo practitioner.
Sort of sounds familiar in a way don't it?
~
I expect after the "ai" is soundly defeated on the offense that the future scenarios will be more difficult when the "ai" is playing defense representing the time Russia repelled the Nazis and then pushed them back.
And that is the reality of "ai" versus human. The "ai" doesn't understand nuance - and probably never will - it is programmed for goodness sake - and Hex of Steel is but a game - but a good game to learn about small towns in Russia I reckon.
~